Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-13-2017, 05:28 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Sure you do, unless you end up drawing the short straw and end up terribly ill with no way to pay for your own healthcare.
Basically you want to force other people at gunpoint to pay for your health care, right?

Do you understand how evil and selfish that is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2017, 05:30 PM
 
Location: Florida
10,456 posts, read 4,040,143 times
Reputation: 8481
Quote:
Originally Posted by CCbaxter View Post
There is lots of cheering going on here about gutting ACA because it cost too much. Government has always taken care of the health of the needy:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...re-aca/521541/

So what now? When someone goes to seek health care they just get turned away to go home and die? If they are treated at a health care facility we pay through either a government reimbursement to the facility or through higher medical costs.
Do we take on the third work option of not allowing people to leave the hospital till their bill is paid?
I hear lots of stuff you don't like..be honest, what is your option? If it's just let them die, please have the guts to come right out and say it. Not my problem equals the same thing.
Um, no it hasn't.

But here is something I have been wondering about. There are several charities out there to help with people in crisis and in need. Many of them have to do with medical expenses, and these charities rakes in millions, if not billions in funds. So, why aren't more people utilizing them? We go to grocery stores and churches and are constantly being asked to donate to some charity or another, so why expand the charity services? Isn't that what they are there for? To pick up the slack for those too poor to succeed on their own?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Austin
15,637 posts, read 10,390,278 times
Reputation: 19525
Quote:
Originally Posted by BornintheSprings View Post
T-310 only cares about himself.
Like you "care" about anyone but yourself other than virtue signaling drivel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 07:18 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,275,432 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
San Franciscans. Happy?
There shouldn't be any homeless people in San Francisco. The left-wing supposedly "cares" about the poor, remember?
Shelter is even more of a critical life-sustaining need than health care.
That depends my dear, you can survive quite nicely sleeping on the sidewalk in many places in the US, you don't usually fare as well if you have cancer and no healthcare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 07:28 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,610,392 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
Oh I dunno..but easier access to birth control and abortion could fix a lot of that, as would teaching about birth control in school.
They've been teaching about birth control in school for some time and the only way access to birth control and abortion could be any easier would be if they had door-to-door delivery and performed the procedure in your bed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 07:33 PM
 
Location: Suburb of Chicago
31,848 posts, read 17,610,392 times
Reputation: 29385
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ringo1 View Post
Everytime you purchase auto or homeowner insurance - you are paying for someone's healthcare. Because all those companies pay for insurance for their employees.


We are all paying one way or the other.
So you're saying State Farm pays for the employees medical insurance in full?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 07:37 PM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,880,554 times
Reputation: 9117
I know what I'm going to do about health care for the poor. Take my money, my assets, and move abroad before paying for everyone else healthcare makes me poor too. Before anyone asks, yes I intend to collect my Social Security. I paid for it and I want it back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 08:12 PM
 
Location: SE Asia
16,236 posts, read 5,880,554 times
Reputation: 9117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uniek View Post
I think the United States requires a cultural revaluation. Ask yourselves whether your society is sustainable with existing attitudes.
Which attitudes?

The attitude of spending over 650 billion a year on our military so that our allies don't have to? I would love to spend half that and use our military for what it is meant for.

The attitude of making excuses for criminals and criminal activity?

The attitude of treating illegals like they are oppressed citizens?

The attitude of allowing the defense industry to fleece we the people? Yeah that will break our backs.

The attitude that our trade deals must always favor our trading partners? Yeah that hasn't helped us much.
The worst attitude is that the US must play world cop and involve ourselves in every disagreement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 08:26 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
So some of you have no problem forcing others at the gunpoint to pay for your health care but will not put up your own money to pay for healthcare for the poor?

What kid of human being are you? Where’s your basic human decency?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 08:31 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,824,472 times
Reputation: 13713
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2sleepy View Post
That depends my dear, you can survive quite nicely sleeping on the sidewalk in many places in the US, you don't usually fare as well if you have cancer and no healthcare.
Sometimes yes. Sometimes no. Not all cancers are terminal. The left obviously believes the poor don't need shelter. They don't need health care, either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top