Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-29-2017, 04:39 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinawina View Post
.
But they aren’t exactly “taxpayer funded”.
Not only do they get a yearly allowance from the British taxpayers, much of their property is also tax exempt. That in itself is a benefit at the hands of the taxpayers.

 
Old 11-29-2017, 04:42 PM
 
6,129 posts, read 6,812,053 times
Reputation: 10821
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Not only do they get a yearly allowance from the British taxpayers, much of their property is also tax exempt. That in itself is a benefit at the hands of the taxpayers.
Isn’t the yearly allowance from the Crown Fund’s interest though? That’s what I’ve always read.

That’s the part that has me confused.
 
Old 11-29-2017, 04:55 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,534,999 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Doll View Post
On the surface, I agree, they seem quite different...but, that’s what’s so great about them, IMO.

Also, they are clearly in love.
I am kind of obsessed with them after watching their BBC interview.
I completely agree with the bolded.....and I'm glad someone else can see it.

With all that is available online now, I hope their union sparks even more interest re people having fun looking into their ancestry.

Decades before the internet came along, someone in my family hired some sort of specialist and had our lineage papers done. His wife was a member of one of the lineage groups that goes back to the founding of the U.S., and wanted to see if he qualified (he did). I was given a copy of our lineage papers as a young adult. I'm a Mayflower Descendent, and a Jamestown Settlement Descendent, and my great-grandfather was a 14th cousin of Queen Elizabeth. If Meghan and Harry have kids, the kids will be 17th cousins of mine. For some reason I can't completely put my finger on (perhaps their personalities?), the thought of their union is much more exciting (to me) than that of William and Kate.

You're likely too young to remember the former, but two events that I can think of sparked at least a bit more interest in genealogy here in the United States....

1. When Prince Charles and Diana married

and to a much greater extent (IMO)....

2. When Obama became President of the United States.

I have a number of web pages re this saved on a hard drive somewhere, but people can easily do searches.

Diana brought more connections to the U.S., as she is related to a number of well known people here, including the Bushes. The Bushes, John Kerry, and Obama are all related, and also a few included in that far reaching web (off the top of my head) are Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie, Hillary, and Brooke Shields, and (), from history, Vlad the Impaler. Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie were distantly related before they got married.

When I was in my 20s, I thought about joining the Sons of the American Revolution....I ended up deciding I could always do it at some date far in the future.

At that point in my young life, I went to a SAR meeting, and brought my lineage book.

I was probably the only person under age 60 at that meeting .

Many of the old guys poured over my book, and found people they said were part of their own lineage.

I've heard that as recently as the 80s, as high as 12% of the U.S. population = Mayflower Descendants, but I don't know if that was the case, or not.

Someone on this thread posted a link that describes how Harry and Meghan are already distantly related......made me think about digging up my lineage book and checking come of the names from that link.

Last edited by RMESMH; 11-29-2017 at 05:45 PM.. Reason: ONE CHARACTER TYPO
 
Old 11-29-2017, 05:11 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,534,999 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQConvict View Post
Seriously, I wouldn't invite Trump to watch a dog take a crap, but this is news for the 70 IQ set.

This story probably appeared next to the one about how Kim Kardashian's sister, like, TOTALLY loves avocados.
Yet it piqued your interest enough to click on the thread and post a comment.
 
Old 11-29-2017, 05:29 PM
 
33,316 posts, read 12,534,999 times
Reputation: 14946
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinm View Post
I agree. I never understood all the fawning over Charles and Diana. We don't care about tourist traps like "royalty" in the UK. You can get the same thing at a Disney park.
So Disney is an equivalent substitute for actual history. Right (/sarcasm off).
 
Old 11-29-2017, 10:40 PM
 
2,106 posts, read 979,486 times
Reputation: 2490
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
Well then you likely seem to be in the minority, as Americans have been fawning over royalty since the Gilded Age and haven't really let up since.


Now for the first time since Wallis Simpson an American woman has broken into the ranks of British royalty, don't expect this story/coverage to die down anytime soon.
Princess Margaret wasn't allowed to marry Peter Townsend because he'd been divorced , that's when she started going a little wild , well wild as far as a royal . Lol
 
Old 11-30-2017, 12:43 AM
 
Location: Nice, France
1,349 posts, read 664,019 times
Reputation: 887
[quote=Listener2307;50257671]OH, GOD!! It's AWFUL! WHATEVER SHALL WE DO??!! THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WILL NOT BE INVITED TO THE WEDDING OF PRINCE HARRY!! SHOOT ME NOW, SO I DON'T HAVE TO WATCH!!

Hey, Bozo! The Obama's were not invited to Prince Williams wedding. So it's no big deal.
Obamas not invited to Prince William and Kate Middleton's Royal wedding | Daily Mail Online]
[

NO PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD, get it ?



Still hope he is president..An effective one, not too crazy
 
Old 11-30-2017, 01:06 AM
 
5,792 posts, read 5,109,605 times
Reputation: 8009
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
How exactly would Trump's absence be an embarrassment?

Did you mean to write that his presence would be an embarrassment?
If he is invited, the British will embarrass themselves. Trump should never be invited to anything worthwhile.
 
Old 11-30-2017, 01:17 AM
 
Location: Itinerant
8,278 posts, read 6,276,391 times
Reputation: 6681
Quote:
Originally Posted by BugsyPal View Post
Currently and has been for some time revenue from CE vastly exceeds sums paid to HM and the RF from the British government. If CE were given back to HM or one of her heirs they'd be *VERY* well off indeed. That won't happen for many reasons and is something conveniently lost upon those calling HM and the RF "parasites" for living "off the government".
The Crown Estate was ceded to the government of Great Britain when George III failed to maintain his legal obligations to pay for a number of civil functions he was personally responsible for (like national defense) and to take over his personal debts. Effectively it was repossessed for failure to meet his financial obligations AND pay off his personal debts, and bear in mind the Monarch received all raised income, thus it's not like he was personally paying for this.

So any income isn't even the crowns after 1760, so that doesn't help your claim of being non-parasites. George III defaulted, under most circumstances any other entity would be eligible for zero income from properties repossessed.
__________________
My mod posts will always be in red.
The RulesInfractions & DeletionsWho's the moderator? • FAQ • What is a "Personal Attack" • What is "Trolling" • Guidelines for copyrighted material.
 
Old 11-30-2017, 03:44 AM
 
4,067 posts, read 2,274,211 times
Reputation: 4384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brave New World View Post
It’s truly AMAZING how some of you obsess over something that “MAY HAPPEN” but hasn’t happened yet or may never happen!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top