Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Exactly how long do we allow this charade to go on at the expense of the taxpayer? 1 year, 3 years, 10 years, 100 years.....?
How far back do we allow Mueller, and is gaggle of democrat party clowns, do we allow Mueller to investigate any possible criminal activity? 1990, 1980, 1970, 1960 because if he looks closely he just might discover Donald Trump cheated on a high school history exam!
So far the only one they "got" is Flynn who was originally hired by Obama only to be fired by President Trump shortly after taking office.
And don't kid yourself, if they really had anything, anything at all, it would have been leaked out.
Obama fired Flynn. Warned trump not to hire him. Trump hired him. Yates warned him against hiring him. Fired Yates instead.
We may be gettting ready for an instant replay of Nixon and Watergate. The question is, why would Trump fire Mueller if he's innocent and this investigation is his best chance of being exonerated by the evidence? Firing Mueller would seem to be the stupidest thing he could possibly do, since it would look like he's trying to cover something up.
"Firing Mueller would seem to be the stupidest thing he could possibly do"
Exactly, which is why he has been baited since the start of this investigation to do that very thing. There was no Russia collusion, so they will try obstruction of justice.
To my knowledge, Trump has made no indication that he is about to fire Mueller. But Democrats creating "rumors on the Hill" and the recent leaks about Mueller's legal team bias suggest damage control. I suspect major news will break in the next week regarding Mueller and/or his legal team.
First Comey then Mueller. Absolutely Trump would get impeached for being a Russian pawn. If he has nothing to hide wrt Russia why would he fire TWO investigators that were into Russiagate?
This has been going on for a year and nothing was found on Trump. Give it a rest already! They could continue wasting their time and resources on this and its going nowhere. Meanwhile Hillary Clinton was proved to be doing a lot of stuff. and nothing is done about her.. although the rats are coming up to the surface from this Mueller probe but its the rats on the Demoncratic side! Trump is innocent.. but look at all the side trash that is being exposed.
He did say he wanted to drain the swamp.. It is happening,but not in the way they thought! Ha!
Ken Starr investigated Bill clinton for 6 years! over that time all he got on clinton was a lie about an affair...
Ken Starr was supposed to investigate Whitewater, but he used that to move sideways, up, down , left , right on and off for 6 years
6 years.
Now tell me Chicago, should Republican POTUS get special protections not afforded to Democratic ones. ..????
As I have said in other threads, you nor I nor anyone else on CD has a clue as to what has or has not been found.
And I continue to say, if there is criminality on either side, let it be exposed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald
Benghazi was wasting money. Even Gowdy finally admitted the whole affair was nothing more than a ploy to discredit Hillary.
Mueller is finding eveidence of wrongdoing and indicting the criminals. Hardly a waste of money.
the only "crimes" found so far are process crimes, like lying to the FBI. mueller is trying to turn those into something he can hang on trump.
however there is REAL evidence of crimes being committed being found, by the mueller investigation team. more and more of them are being found to committing a conspiracy to change the results of the election, but the IG will deal with that.
We may be gettting ready for an instant replay of Nixon and Watergate. The question is, why would Trump fire Mueller if he's innocent and this investigation is his best chance of being exonerated by the evidence? Firing Mueller would seem to be the stupidest thing he could possibly do, since it would look like he's trying to cover something up.
There is no comparison with Watergate in this corrupt investigation. This is far worse than Watergate, and it is the Democrats that should be worried. They are the ones in trouble here. Big trouble.
You must not be old enough to remember Watergate. You don't seem to know what it was about, if you are trying to compare this "investigation" to Watergate. In Watergate, they were actually investigating a crime. Here, there is no crime. They are looking for a crime to investigate.
The crimes committed here are all on the part of the Democrats who are doing the investigation into the Trump team, which has done nothing illegal, and that is a huge difference. But we have people on Mueller's team that were colluding with the Russians to create a fake "dossier" on Trump. They were secretly conspiring to derail his campaign, and if that didn't work, they (as we now know) were formulating how they would prevent him from getting elected. And if that fake "dossier" was used to obtain the FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign, it is even worse. Some of these people (Democrats) could be headed for prison.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
