Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Devin Nunes should be under investigation for being a Russian operative. He certainly acts like one....but then so does Trump and half the GOP.
the model for a Russian stooge was played perfectly by Obama. Unfortunately Obama was too obvious having defended putin and took action to ensure he did not displease putin. It is Hillary that really partnered with Russia to expose classified information.
nunes was found innocent of trumped up charges by a committee of his legislative peers.
If silence equals guilt, most of the Obama crowd that went before congressional committees were guilty of crimes. How about all the immunity that was handed out like candy for Hillary's buddies that were questioned.
So Nunes pulled together this four page memo and now is saying he can't say for sure that the WH wasn't involved?
I want to know how Nunes wrote a 4 page memo on intelligence he never read. I wish I had that skill when it came to my book reports.
A question I never received an answer to: Why would we trust Nunes over Wray when Nunes has already been forced to recuse himself from the investigation?
Also, how can Nunes be impartial when he was part of the Trump transition team and the investigation encompasses the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia?
Sen. Richard Burr (R) already said the "unmasking" controversy was a non-controversy and Republicans have not really talked much about it since.
Nah. Its the meeting minutes from the intelligence committee. It IS in fact very interesting, and a great link. Covers what Schiff was saying. The chairman is Nunes, and its in his role as chairman that he responds to the question mentioned. Its at about the 1/2 way mark. But the prior discussion makes it quite clear that many think this is political, and the damage it does to the ability of the intelligence committee to oversee things. They have a agreement to not do this sort of nonsense apparently, and they are breaking it.
Nah. Its the meeting minutes from the intelligence committee. It IS in fact very interesting, and a great link. Covers what Schiff was saying. The chairman is Nunes, and its in his role as chairman that he responds to the question mentioned. Its at about the 1/2 way mark. But the prior discussion makes it quite clear that many think this is political, and the damage it does to the ability of the intelligence committee to oversee things. They have a agreement to not do this sort of nonsense apparently, and they are breaking it.
So, in other words, it is not evidence that the FBI abused the FISA process.
How exactly is this responsive to my request that stburr provide evidence that the FBI has been abusing the FISA process?
I want to know how Nunes wrote a 4 page memo on intelligence he never read. I wish I had that skill when it came to my book reports.
He has employees that do it. The primary author appears to be a lawyer who 2 years ago got a "order of ineptitude" slapped on him by a judge in a 2016 DOJ case.
Quote:
A question I never received an answer to: Why would we trust Nunes over Wray when Nunes has already been forced to recuse himself from the investigation?
Now they are claiming that he never actually said those EXACT words, and so he isn't recused now. But no we shouldn't trust him as his last bit of fiction was also disproven.
Quote:
Also, how can Nunes be impartial when he was part of the Trump transition team and the investigation encompasses the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia?
He can't. Again, the earlier incident where he ran to the whitehouse with information, and then spouted nonsense about deep state operatives, etc has shown this.
I want to know how Nunes wrote a 4 page memo on intelligence he never read. I wish I had that skill when it came to my book reports.
A question I never received an answer to: Why would we trust Nunes over Wray when Nunes has already been forced to recuse himself from the investigation?
Also, how can Nunes be impartial when he was part of the Trump transition team and the investigation encompasses the Trump campaign's contacts with Russia?
Yet McCabe couldn't be trusted to be an impartial investigaor because his wife ran for office as a Democrat and received a donation from another Democrat's PAC...who supported Hillary?
The mental backflips that Trump cultists are capable of...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
