Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If the anti-gun crowd saw him in the Trump shirt which would surely put him on their naughty list they couldn't simply deny him a slot up front. They would have to say he didn't show up, there was a scheduling conflict, or some other excuse.
If he asked to speak or applied to speak (I don't know how it worked) prior to the event they wouldn't want the optics of shutting him down ahead of time. So this is a convenient excuse for them. That is if he was there and ready to go. Maybe he didn't show up/they couldn't find him.
The shooter posted a picture of himself wearing a MAGNA hat.
He also posted white supremest/ anti Jew ideology.
Then why didn't do this after the Las Vegas shooting? Why didn't they do it after the shooting at the Republican baseball game?
I'll tell you why... this whole anti-gun campaign was pre-planned. They were just waiting for an event with enough psychological "oomph" to happen and set their machinations in motion.
It's Social Engineering in action. They are telling you all how you should think.
Said the poster who accused Emma Gonzales of "using a tactic from Hitler's playbook:.
Wait so which is it? Are we using the children or are we being used. You are not being consistent with your "propaganda".
And also, the fact that school children were affected more strongly by something that happened to them rather than strangers in las vegas is now evidence of their duplicity?
Before the outsiders got involved with their mythical millions of dollars these kids were fine with mass murder. Now Soros has them believing that mass murders are bad. Guys like him have no shame.
Till it happens to you...
( FormerSheriff David Clarke speculates the “March for Life has Geo Soros fingerprints all over it” is not factual. This has not however prevented online rags from reporting it as fact. People believe anything when it seems to validate their perceptions)
Even though the friends/family of the shooting victims do have noble intentions in wanting to advocate gun control, sometimes their proposals are ridiculous. I wouldn't put it past some of those friends/family advocating a total gun ban here. However, that would violate the Second Amendment. Another thing concerns their media appearances: sometimes there are inconsistencies on what actually happened, such as post #60. If Person A wants Person B to take Person A seriously, Person A would want to make sure that they are being consistent. They are not in control of what a news report says but they are in control of what they say.
This is what happens when people are used by elites for their own political ends.
The father spoke poignantly when he visited the White House with his sons and other victims' families after the shooting. You may want to search out that video on the White House youtube channel.
Said the poster who accused Emma Gonzales of "using a tactic from Hitler's playbook:.
Wait so which is it? Are we using the children or are we being used. You are not being consistent with your "propaganda".
And also, the fact that school children were affected more strongly by something that happened to them rather than strangers in las vegas is now evidence of their duplicity?
You can't even keep your own paranoia straight.
um... her name is: "militant shaved head girl"
...and I was obviously pointing out that the Leftist strategy called for a certain kind of tragedy, which is why they passed on the other shootings and waited for something to happen like the Florida school shooting.
The Social Engineers wish Nutbags (I don't type the killer's names anymore because I refuse to add to their fame in any way) would have at least used high capacity magazines instead of 10 rounders but they don't report that tidbit... kinda important because if they want to ban certain kinds of guns to prevent such a thing from happening again, why aren't they trying ban a whole host of non-AR-15 rifles that have 10 round capacities and load/shoot just as fast?
Before the outsiders got involved with their mythical millions of dollars these kids were fine with mass murder. Now Soros has them believing that mass murders are bad. Guys like him have no shame.
Don't you think if you're going to make false claims of this sort, you should at least make them believable rather than outlandish?
Later: Oops, missed the roll-eyes emoji. My apologies, I should know how to appreciate satire.
Last edited by CraigCreek; 03-25-2018 at 11:10 AM..
They are against freedom of speech and they want to disarm the population. And they are becoming more and more anti Semitic.
Who does that remind you of?
What ?? South Fl Jews rock ? What are you talking about
I want them to be safe at school. As adults, it is our responsibility to figure out how to end school violence. Yet, the anti-gun crowd has suddenly decided that children are the voice of reason and we should blindly accept whatever ill-conceived nonsense they come up with. No matter what side of the gun control issue you're on, you would literally have to be insane to not see the idiocy of letting teenagers dictate policy. There is no debate here. As sure as the sun is hot and water is wet, teenagers have NEVER been considered a credible source for shaping public policy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.