Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
All the colonial and post colonial war were fought for corporate domination of foreign resources.
Yes, statism sucks. Various States use/have used war to gather up markets so their bankers could subdue the masses with monopolized currencies/artificial scarcity. That's socialism though.
When do I hear about capitalism? Force initiation, such as violence, is not part of capitalism.
I know I'm using "odd" definitions but remember I don't believe what I was indoctrinated with at my mandated government education center (local public school). My definitions are correct.
Also he is describing state authoritarianism. I (and Marx) don't believe in the state.
From what I can tell you believe in a variation of the State. A State being any involuntary centralized authority that has not only somehow attained rights (which is logically impossible) but also has different rights than the individuals inside and outside the politburo...err...I mean the syndicate.
Marx’s philosophy would lead directly to the deaths of 100 million human beings over the course of a century, the imprisonment of tens of millions more in gulags and reeducation camps from Russia to China to Vietnam to Cambodia to North Korea, and the oppression of hundreds of millions more hasn’t dissuaded those on the modern Western left from embracing Marx’s bloody legacy
None of which were communist or socialist. They only used the name.
Hitler's concentration camps sure won't be blamed on capitalism, but blame Marx on something that wasn't Marxist.
There were geopolitical reasons this happen. If you keep putting down real socialist moments and keep oppressing the workers eventually you'll get a dangerous reaction via an authoritarian dictator.
Yes, statism sucks. Various States use/have used war to gather up markets so their bankers could subdue the masses with monopolized currencies/artificial scarcity. That's socialism though.
When do I hear about capitalism? Force initiation, such as violence, is not part of capitalism.
I know I'm using "odd" definitions but remember I don't believe what I was indoctrinated with at my mandated government education center (local public school). My definitions are correct.
If you are to claim real capitalism has never existed then I can't give you a number of how many it has killed.
But I can say the numbers attributed to Marx are lies as dictatorships aren't socialism;
Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
No mention of the state, only a worker run society as seen via the Zapatistas, etc.
From what I can tell you believe in a variation of the State. A State being any involuntary centralized authority that has not only somehow attained rights (which is logically impossible) but also has different rights than the individuals inside and outside the politburo...err...I mean the syndicate.
Nope, de-centralized.
Individual work places will manage the economy and political system. There will be NO central power.
None of which were communist or socialist. They only used the name.
Hitler's concentration camps sure won't be blamed on capitalism, but blame Marx on something that wasn't Marxist.
There were geopolitical reasons this happen. If you keep putting down real socialist moments and keep oppressing the workers eventually you'll get a dangerous reaction via an authoritarian dictator.
everything the evil marx ever wrote about was tripe-soup
his theory of economics is garbage
\
his theory about a socialist utopia...pure garbage
and while idiot advocates of Marxism like you.. ""disown"" the Stalinists and the Maoists and the Castro regime and Venezuela and North Korea, all of those nations thought they were fulfilling Marx’s dream.
marx was the most delusional and evil man ever to live
If you are to claim real capitalism has never existed then I can't give you a number of how many it has killed.
But I can say the numbers attributed to Marx are lies as dictatorships aren't socialism;
Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
No mention of the state, only a worker run society as seen via the Zapatistas, etc.
Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the all powerful government as a whole.
Karl Heinrich Marx: the most evil man to ever live.
If you are to claim real capitalism has never existed then I can't give you a number of how many it has killed.
But I can say the numbers attributed to Marx are lies as dictatorships aren't socialism;
Socialism: a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
No mention of the state, only a worker run society as seen via the Zapatistas, etc.
Capitalism hasn't killed anyone because force initiation is not possible under the free exchange of goods and services.
Statism is the umbrella under which all evil takes place. Many people have used Marxist ideals to propagate States that have been quite murderous. Many people have used capitalist ideals to propagate States that have been quite murderous (The U.S.).
I read up on your philosophy and it doesn't make any sense outside of a labor-based paradigm. It has no principles originating from the basis of the default life settings of a human being (born free from contract and in poverty).
It's simply a way to organize traditional work methods/labor structures if people happen to find themselves doing that.
Some of the tenets are actually pretty agreeable in theory but make no sense as far as a life philosophy goes.
"Individual work places" is a collective. Collectives have centralized authority to some degree.
"Individuals" will manage my economy and political system (if that individual chooses to form one).
See the difference?
Like I said, some of your tenets within the paradigm of work stations/factories are actually pretty appealing. The only problem is an involuntary collective is part of the paradigm.
You're simply transferring the control of the means of production from the State to a lesser State.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
