Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A federal judge in California has ruled that the Obama administration’s detention of children and their mothers who were caught crossing the border illegally is a serious violation of a longstanding court settlement, and that the families should be released as quickly as possible. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/u...ee-ruling.html
A federal judge in California has ruled that the Obama administration’s detention of children and their mothers who were caught crossing the border illegally is a serious violation of a longstanding court settlement, and that the families should be released as quickly as possible. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/u...ee-ruling.html
A federal judge in California has ruled that the Obama administration’s detention of children and their mothers who were caught crossing the border illegally is a serious violation of a longstanding court settlement, and that the families should be released as quickly as possible. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/u...ee-ruling.html
A federal judge in California has ruled that the Obama administration’s detention of children and their mothers who were caught crossing the border illegally is a serious violation of a longstanding court settlement, and that the families should be released as quickly as possible. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/u...ee-ruling.html
YOU ARE NOT QUOTING THE LAW.
SO AGAIN QUOTE THE ACTUAL LAW. THE WORDS THAT SAY TRUMP MUST DO IT THIS WAY.
No such law exists thus you have still not quoted it...
You must be thinking of The Late Imperialistic Lord King Hussein Obama? KING OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS. That guy signed so many illegal EO's he probably needed a wrist brace from the carpal tunnel .
SO AGAIN QUOTE THE ACTUAL LAW. THE WORDS THAT SAY TRUMP MUST DO IT THIS WAY.
No such law exists thus you have still not quoted it...
And now, Trump is agreeing to stop this policy if you have not heard. It's going to be hilarious watching the Trump cultists twist, turn, flip and flop trying to justify why he changed his mind.
Let's not forget had these people gone to/through the Port Of Entry like non criminals do every single day they'd not have been arrested or separated from their children.
The problem is they entered ILLEGALLY as in NOT at the Port Of Entry, but the hand wringers forget that or chose to ignore it as it doesn't fit their "I hate Trump" meme...
In recent days news organizations like cbs, washington post, npr, and many others have been reporting that asylum seekers at legal points of entry are being turned away. Some are camping out nearby so they can keep trying to be allowed to enter (under the international agreements that the U.S. has long been a party to) and other immigrants choose to walk over to illegal ports of entry and try to get in there. Whichever path they are able to use has the same result: parents and children are separated. This is one of the factors that contributed to the public outcry.
Fingerprints are enough. Much quicker and cheaper to capture and compare than DNA. Fingerprints can be digitized and looked up just looking up a product price by scanning a barcode.
This is about families being taken in together. We only need to connect a child to the parent that was accompanying them. DNA might be advisable for unaccompanied children but that is not the issue at hand.
The processing of a family might go like this on day 1:
Father, assign alien id 1001, take fingerprint, link to 1002/1003/1004
Mother, assign alien id 1002, take fingerprint, link to 1001/1003/1004
Child1, assign alien id 1003, take fingerprint, link to 1001/1002/1004
Child2, assign alien id 1004, take fingerprint, link to 1001/1002/1003
Do you have any evidence that this was or is being done, though?
I heard an interview on NPR a day or so ago in which a mother stated that she and others held with her who were applying for asylum were given pieces of paper that were supposed to bear their children's names and locations. Trouble was, it wasn't her kids' names on that paper. And there didn't seem to be anyone around to whom she could report this.
At least she was able to speak to a reporter, so I hope things were straightened out, but when you're dealing with thousands of children, few of whom speak English and many of whom are too young to talk at all, careless mistakes of this kind can have extremely tragic consequences. Innocent children can get lost in the shuffle, literally.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
