Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because Trump said Mexico would pay for it. Guaranteed. Guess's how much Mexico had paid? $0.
Keep drinking the Kool Aid. Trump is a terrible deal maker and has been his entire career.
This crap again? How many times do I have to post the link of Trump's plan to make them pay? Were you and yours concerned about who was going to pay for the wall back in 2006 when it was to be soley funded by the taxpayer? Though not, hypocrites!
She caved. She will cave some more. And again and again and again. Somehow this is Trump's loss?
I don't think so.
Characterizing this as Pelosi having "caved" is a bit of a stretch.
The amount allocated for 55 miles (!) of fencing is less than what was allocated in December and it's certainly nowhere near the $5.7 billion Trump has demanded.
And what money has been allocated has not been allocated for a wall.
Congress has not given him what he's asked for.
How it is not a loss for Trump?
"A congressional aide, who asked not to be identified, said the outline of the deal included $1.37 billion for erecting new fencing along the southern border. That is about the same amount Congress allocated last year and far below what Trump has demanded. The aide said none of the money would be for a "wall," which Trump has been touting since he launched his campaign for president in 2016. Democrats say the wall would be costly and ineffective."
55 miles this time. 55 miles the next time.
By the time he leaves office in 2024 it will be all done.
Pelosi said "none". Define "none". It is not $1.6B.
Don't hold your breath for the anti-wall people in here to chastise her for that lie as they are nothing but hypocrites!
"OG"? You mean Parrot Man? If that's who you're referring to the answer is no. Nobody cares what he thinks except for maybe Wackokitty, Cheesewhiz, and a few of the other usual suspects.
This crap again? How many times do I have to post the link of Trump's plan to make them pay? Were you and yours concerned about who was going to pay for the wall back in 2006 when it was to be soley funded by the taxpayer? Though not, hypocrites!
Don't worry about it. I already posted your talking points on the previous page, so everyone is very clear that you think Mexico is paying for the wall through restructured trade agreements.
While we're talking about hypocrisy, several people are still waiting for you to acknowledge that you were wrong when you said Trump never said a "wall" had already been built.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
How many times do I have to post the link of Trump's plan to make them pay? Were you and yours concerned about who was going to pay for the wall back in 2006 when it was to be soley funded by the taxpayer? Though not, hypocrites!
