Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-01-2019, 04:46 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,211,524 times
Reputation: 9895

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Why can't someone just identify as a protected class then?
Everyone is part of a protected class, but wearing a hat is not a protected class.

If I kick out a woman for being disruptive, it is legal even though sex is a protected class.

You can decide that you will not serve people in green shirts, green shirts are not a protected class even though the person wearing the shirt is protected on the basis of race, sex, religion, etc. Green shirts are not a race, religion, sex, or any other protected class.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-01-2019, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,302 posts, read 2,356,621 times
Reputation: 1230
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Why can't someone just identify as a protected class then?
Ha...the first thing that came to mind when I read the title was "I bet someone will be arguing that there's a difference between discriminating based on something you can change (like political views) and something you can't (like race)...and then I'll proceed to go SJW on them and shame them for being a xenophobic bigot who believes people can't choose their own identity."

I guess you sort of beat me to that point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 04:57 PM
 
Location: Madison, WI
5,302 posts, read 2,356,621 times
Reputation: 1230
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Everyone is part of a protected class, but wearing a hat is not a protected class.

If I kick out a woman for being disruptive, it is legal even though sex is a protected class.

You can decide that you will not serve people in green shirts, green shirts are not a protected class even though the person wearing the shirt is protected on the basis of race, sex, religion, etc. Green shirts are not a race, religion, sex, or any other protected class.
Then maybe he identifies as someone who's being discriminated against based on race, sex, and religion.

I'm not even sure if you agree with the social justice stuff. I just have fun playing that game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 05:01 PM
 
20,955 posts, read 8,678,698 times
Reputation: 14050
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomadicDrifter View Post
Not wanting to take someone's money in business is a powerful statement. It's a statement of intolerance. When that intolerance is aimed at a small minority, it's not an issue for the stability of a country. But when that intolerance is aimed at 30-40% of the electorate, then you have yourself a growing problem.
If the business has a problem they will go out of business.

Many places require shoes, shirts and socks. I'm sure some places require jackets and ask gentlemen to remove their hats.

Why would any MAGA person want to eat somewhere that doesn't like them? I've never been to Hooters because I don't like the way it degrades women. I don't go to strip clubs for the same reason.

Sorry to inform, but MAGA hat wearers do not constitute a "class" under the law. Maybe MAGA wearers should petition their elected reps to make this front and center and declare them protected under Civil Rights Laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 05:03 PM
Status: "Apparently the worst poster on CD" (set 29 days ago)
 
27,651 posts, read 16,142,781 times
Reputation: 19074
Quote:
Originally Posted by No_Recess View Post
Why can't someone just identify as a protected class then?
you may have something here
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 05:05 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,490,585 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by saltine View Post
you may have something here
Everyone is already part of several protected classes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 05:07 PM
 
Location: Ft. Myers
19,719 posts, read 16,846,967 times
Reputation: 41863
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGoodTheBadTheUgly View Post
Interesting, it was not that long ago that the left was saying that restaurants cannot refuse to serve anyone. The people full of hate continues to be the left.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...s-wearing-maga

How would you know, you have only been around here for a month ? That doesn't give you a lot of history to rely on.

Secondly, most of us have always said a business has the right to decide who it wants to serve, so you are very wet on that point as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Central New Jersey
2,516 posts, read 1,697,086 times
Reputation: 4512
It's his right as a business owner to refuse service to anyone I reckon. However, the first ones told due to their choice of headgear should contact an attorney. I would for emotional scarring or whatever
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 05:13 PM
 
16,376 posts, read 22,490,585 times
Reputation: 14398
Quote:
Originally Posted by joee5 View Post
It's his right as a business owner to refuse service to anyone I reckon. However, the first ones told due to their choice of headgear should contact an attorney. I would for emotional scarring or whatever

One could argue that emotional scarring was there before the restaurant visit, hence the choice to wear the hat.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2019, 06:25 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,539,613 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Yeah -- if a baker can refuse to make a cake for someone whose lifestyle he doesn't support, a chef can refuse service to a person wearing a hate that the chef thinks represents hate.

That's how the world works.

The left and right seem to want to be able to do things their way but not allow the same opportunities others.
Exactly! I think both were terrible ideas but it is their choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top