Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by skeddy View Post
problem is 100% don't want to pay for it. Silly poll.

BernieCare would cost roughly $13.8 trillion over its first decade of operation, roughly a 30 percent increase in federal spending.

Will you handover 30% of your income for it?
Actually a study done by a conservative group says the cost would decrease.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:53 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado^ View Post
Poor people vote for others to pay for their $h!t. News at 11:00.
That would mean 71% of Americans are poor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by notnamed View Post


If this proposal costs less. Then we could essentially just take your employer/employee premium, give it to this new system instead and there you go with no increase.

And again, you are already paying for others. Your costs today help cover those folks that show up at an ER and can't pay.
but see, these plans take the cost OFF the employer, and put it directly on the employee(taxpayer)…..

for example currently you pay 500 a month...your 500/month is 25% of the actual premium..your employer is paying 1500/month for you

under a UHC/SP the ENTIRE cost is on the individual taxpayer, no more employer contribution
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
While the Swiss system is interesting, having only 8.5 million people and being a somewhat homogeneous population doesn't hurt either!
Homogeneous? They speak 4 different languages.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:58 AM
 
17,311 posts, read 12,263,996 times
Reputation: 17263
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
everyone deserves... just open up the yellow pages and find a doctors

its your health...its your body...its the SERVICE YOU receive..and its your bill..... NO-ONE should have to pay YOUR bill for you... have some pride man
So that reverts to cancer being a death sentence for everyone but multi-millionaires, which it will bankrupt in a short amount of time.

Some sort of pooling mechanism is the only way to achieve the increased life spans we have now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 10:58 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Why not have a buy-in for Universal Health Care? Agree to be taxed at 45% federal income tax rate on all of one's income, and get Universal Health Care. No income = no buy-in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 11:00 AM
 
17,311 posts, read 12,263,996 times
Reputation: 17263
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
but see, these plans take the cost OFF the employer, and put it directly on the employee(taxpayer)…..

for example currently you pay 500 a month...your 500/month is 25% of the actual premium..your employer is paying 1500/month for you

under a UHC/SP the ENTIRE cost is on the individual taxpayer, no more employer contribution
Right, I mentioned that.

But your employer also pays a significant portion of your income tax that you never see to begin with. It's a shell game. Would just become the employer paid health tax contribution. Or ideally, just redirected to our pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,659,569 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
but see, these plans take the cost OFF the employer, and put it directly on the employee(taxpayer)…..

for example currently you pay 500 a month...your 500/month is 25% of the actual premium..your employer is paying 1500/month for you

under a UHC/SP the ENTIRE cost is on the individual taxpayer, no more employer contribution
Obviously that would depend on how it is set up. Some of the cost could come from corporate taxes, some from individual taxes, and some from VAT.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,145,129 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Actually a study done by a conservative group says the cost would decrease.
So hypothetically here.... An item costs X but the price is lowered by 10%. But... I've paid an annual dues of 30% to join the club. If I use the club enough in my purchases it might be a fiscally sound decision to have purchased that membership. If I don't use the club enough to justify the membership I'm screwed. Sounds like what you want is Costco Health Insurance to me....... I don't want to join the club.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-08-2019, 11:01 AM
 
19,654 posts, read 12,239,759 times
Reputation: 26453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
That would mean 71% of Americans are poor.
Right, they cannot imagine anyone would vote for the benefit of society.

A lot of rich people in MA voted for health care in their state. Maybe they don't want disease outbreaks in their cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:39 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top