Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-13-2019, 11:41 AM
 
1,442 posts, read 1,342,162 times
Reputation: 1597

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ottomobeale View Post
Then preach on. Walk the walk means you may talk the talk.

Im tired of DINKS telling people with families it is so easy.
A LOT of DINKS (my hubby and I included), actually did have kids and now they are grown. I’d say we kinda know a few things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2019, 11:53 AM
exm
 
3,722 posts, read 1,783,344 times
Reputation: 2850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adhom View Post
Living in a high tax blue state, my taxes did go up because we lost SALT deductions. And for those of you who thinks we deserve this because of where we live, just wait til the shoe is on the other foot. The only thing I learned from Trump is to have no compassion for Americans who don't think like me.
You lost SALT. Okay, well actually SALT was limited to $10,000. You didn't lose it.


What you also gained is:
- Higher standard deduction (if you use this)
- No more AMT for most of us
- Lower overall tax rates


What's your total tax bill vs 2017?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by moneill View Post
Ahem -- they are trying-- knocking 5 billion plus down to one billion plus for the wall.

That's a good start wouldn't you say?


only 1.3 billion DIRECTLY for the wall as a down payment...
yet there is still 25 billion in there for border security...




so did they really "knock it down"???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by craigiri View Post
Actually not. As you well know it takes the House, Senate and the POTUS to do that.

But, nice try. The fact is the deficit was being brought down in the last years of a Dem POTUS....it was about 600 Billion, now it is double that for one reason only - complete GOP control.

That's the proof. Positive.
false


well that depends


10/01/2009................................ 11,920,519,164,319.42
09/30/2010................................ 13,561,623,030,891.79
difference of 1,641,103,866,572............................1.6 trillion deficit fy10

10/01/2010.................................13,610,847,58 5,810.09
09/30/2011.................................14,790,340,32 8,557.15
1,179,492,742,747...........................1.17tr illion deficit fy11

09/30/2011................................ 14,790,340,328,557.15
09/28/2012................................ 16,066,241,407,385.89
1,275,901,078,828..........................1.27 trillion deficit fy12

10/01/2012.................................16,159,487,01 3,300.35
09/30/2013.................................16,738,183,52 6,697.32
578,696,513,397..............................578 billion deficit fy13......the only one of two full years under one trillion

10/01/2013................................. 16,747,478,675,335.18
09/30/2014................................. 17,824,071,380,733.82
1,076,592,705,398..............................1.0 7 trillion deficit fy14


10/01/2014................................. 17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2015................................. 18,150,617,666,484.33
326,546,285,750.51..............................32 6 billion deficit fy15...the second less than trillion



10/01/2015................................. 18,150,617,666,484.33
09/30/2016.................................19,573,444,71 3,936.79
1,422,827,047,452.46.............................. 1.42 trillion deficit fy16


10/01/2016.................................19,573,444,71 3,936.79
09/30/2017.................................20,244,900,01 6,053.51
671,455,302,117.............................. .671 trillion (671 billion) deficit fy17 (fy17 is a shared Obama/trump)

10/01/2017.................................20,244,900,01 6,053.51
09/30/2018.................................21,516,058,18 3,180.23
1.27 trill..............................deficit fy18....

fy16 1.4 trill was higher and only 2 years ago


source: US Treasury
https://treasurydirect.gov/NP/debt/current
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,565,307 times
Reputation: 18814
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
No. National defense is a Constitutionally-mandated expense. Find somewhere else to cut costs.

LMAO, so spending in excess of $700 billion is a Constitutional mandate? LMAO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mightyqueen801 View Post
You can't buy a "palace" for $250K in NJ. Lucky if you can find a 2 BR condo for that.
that actually depends on where in Jersey


go up to Newton, Green or Sparta, and you are in the country...and you can get a real nice place for 250k.... nothing near you, might have to drive a half hour to get to a real grocery store.. but it is there




https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...-67821?view=qv


180k nearly 3000sf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,500,230 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
LMAO, so spending in excess of $700 billion is a Constitutional mandate? LMAO
medicare is bigger than 700billion...


so what is your point
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:13 PM
 
Location: OH->FL->NJ
17,005 posts, read 12,602,310 times
Reputation: 8930
Quote:
Originally Posted by CLR210 View Post
A LOT of DINKS (my hubby and I included), actually did have kids and now they are grown. I’d say we kinda know a few things.
DINKS AFAIK always meant never had kids soooooo.

Okay perhaps DINNKS

Dual Income Never No Kids
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:15 PM
 
9,617 posts, read 6,067,889 times
Reputation: 3884
Default As Jack Nicholson said, “You want the truth? You can’t stand the truth!”

The truth.

Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
false


well that depends


10/01/2009................................ 11,920,519,164,319.42
09/30/2010................................ 13,561,623,030,891.79
difference of 1,641,103,866,572............................1.6 trillion deficit fy10

10/01/2010.................................13,610,847,58 5,810.09
09/30/2011.................................14,790,340,32 8,557.15
1,179,492,742,747...........................1.17tr illion deficit fy11

09/30/2011................................ 14,790,340,328,557.15
09/28/2012................................ 16,066,241,407,385.89
1,275,901,078,828..........................1.27 trillion deficit fy12

10/01/2012.................................16,159,487,01 3,300.35
09/30/2013.................................16,738,183,52 6,697.32
578,696,513,397..............................578 billion deficit fy13......the only one of two full years under one trillion

10/01/2013................................. 16,747,478,675,335.18
09/30/2014................................. 17,824,071,380,733.82
1,076,592,705,398..............................1.0 7 trillion deficit fy14


10/01/2014................................. 17,824,071,380,733.82
09/30/2015................................. 18,150,617,666,484.33
326,546,285,750.51..............................32 6 billion deficit fy15...the second less than trillion



10/01/2015................................. 18,150,617,666,484.33
09/30/2016.................................19,573,444,71 3,936.79
1,422,827,047,452.46.............................. 1.42 trillion deficit fy16


10/01/2016.................................19,573,444,71 3,936.79
09/30/2017.................................20,244,900,01 6,053.51
671,455,302,117.............................. .671 trillion (671 billion) deficit fy17 (fy17 is a shared Obama/trump)

10/01/2017.................................20,244,900,01 6,053.51
09/30/2018.................................21,516,058,18 3,180.23
1.27 trill..............................deficit fy18....

fy16 1.4 trill was higher and only 2 years ago


source: US Treasury
https://treasurydirect.gov/NP/debt/current
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2019, 12:17 PM
 
13,966 posts, read 5,632,409 times
Reputation: 8621
Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartGotts View Post
Just finished my tax returns...

I made more money, paid more in taxes and am getting back 1/3 the amount I got last year!

SOOOOOO HAAAPPPPY your rich 1% buddies got a tax break, they REEEAAAALLY need it.

Congrats however, now I know I'm voting for ANYONE but Trump.
What was your overall federal tax as a percentage of your total income, compared on a YOY basis?

Your refund is simply a representation of how much was over-stolen by the government that is marketed as a gift to you, but is more like "under the rules, we are only allowed to steal X, and we stole X + R, so here is R"
So actually, if you got a lower refund with the same withholdings, then the law actually tightened up to make it less sloppy and in need of big refunds that reflect big differences in the tables and reality.

The only measure of "did you pay more taxes" is taking your entire federal AGI and then figuring your total federal tax, minus the two payroll tax thefts (FICA, Mediwelfare) as a percentage, and seeing that comparison YOY.

BTW, if the SALT cap got you, that isn't you paying more federal tax. That is actually the federal taxpayers no longer funding your state's illusion that they are a low tax state when they aren't. The SALT cap is nothing but disinfecting sunlight on high tax states who have used that deduction to make it look like free lunches are possible.

Give us the total numbers and then we can figure out if you actually paid more in federal tax, or if you simply need to a) learn math, b) learn basic logic and c) get a better tax preparer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top