Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:54 AM
 
45,233 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24992

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grlzrl View Post
Well, maybe if we weren't importing millions of illegal aliens, we could afford to do some of this stuff.
the ones here working are a benefit to you by way of cheaper goods and services, the ones who come here and get free medical and govt education are a problem. Stop all the giveaways and welfare.
Why do you want the govt in the child rearing biz?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:55 AM
 
36,539 posts, read 30,879,493 times
Reputation: 32816
Quote:
Originally Posted by atltechdude View Post
Disagree with this. 50k is a completely arbitrary income limit, and this gives people an incentive not to increase their income. Also the tax code already too heavily incentivizes child care. As a person with no children yet, I’m sick of paying for everyone else’s kids.
Yeah, here is an idea. If one is going to have children plan out the expense of that and how your going to pay for it. If you cant sort it out, don't have children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:55 AM
 
Location: Near Falls Lake
4,255 posts, read 3,177,132 times
Reputation: 4703
Quote:
Originally Posted by geofra View Post
Free childcare is a Godsend for families that don't have non-working relatives readily available and willing, because obtaining it otherwise is so effin' expensive.
Yes, child care is expensive but if you can't afford children.....don't have them. Why should someone else have to pay for YOUR children?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:56 AM
 
Location: Former land of plenty
3,212 posts, read 1,653,319 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
So your admitting that campaign promises are just that and no rational person actually takes them literally understanding that we do not operate under a dictatorship so these declarations and funding for such can not come to fruition on the want or "promise" of one individual?
People do take campaign promises literally. From both sides. You don't want your side to be held accountable. Just mine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:58 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,038 posts, read 44,853,831 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clarallel View Post
You notice that things you consider a "fantasy" are often realized quite workably by other countries, countries where the emphasis is on improving the lives of citizens, instead of enriching the already rich?
THIS is why... Their average income earners pay a 45% national tax rate.

The effective national tax rate is in the second from the right column on page 9:

http://www.institutmolinari.org/IMG/...en-eu-2017.pdf

If you think you or anyone else thinks they can convince the average US income earner ($59,000/household) to pay a 45% effective federal tax rate, feel free to do so. We'll see if that happens...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Former land of plenty
3,212 posts, read 1,653,319 times
Reputation: 2017
As the rich get richer, less people will be able to afford children. The right wing hates people having families.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 06:59 AM
 
19,387 posts, read 6,508,176 times
Reputation: 12310
Quote:
Originally Posted by cchampagne232000 View Post
Just an example of the cost of daycare today. I have 3 kids. Both Mom and Dad work. We were fortunately able to keep Mom home for the first year of each child's life. Costs for each kid were 1200 per month for 48 months. 172,800 bucks to put 3 kids in daycare.

Like college educations, the cost of child care has exploded. It is crippling many families. I don't think this is the solution but it is a problem that society should address.

Also- many parents already get "vouchers" for childcare costs. I'm not sure how this would change that.
My parents wanted a third child also, but they ran the numbers and decided they couldn't afford it and would be happy with the two (wonderful!) kids they ended up with.

I'm not saying you shouldn't have had a third. I know you live them all. But you shouldn't have had him, and then complain that you need taxpayers to pay for daycare expenses.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 07:01 AM
 
Location: NC
5,129 posts, read 2,598,801 times
Reputation: 2398
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Sanders never proposed free college. People who do not educate themselves should not condemn those who want to.
the Bern has tweeted about free college a few hundred times.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2mares View Post
Yeah, here is an idea. If one is going to have children plan out the expense of that and how your going to pay for it. If you cant sort it out, don't have children.
I believe I have suggested exactly this. My family is my responsibility... your family is not my responsibility.

Last edited by tripleh; 02-20-2019 at 07:11 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 07:01 AM
 
45,233 posts, read 26,457,645 times
Reputation: 24992
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlongTheI-5 View Post
As the rich get richer, less people will be able to afford children. The right wing hates people having families.
I dont know about the right "hating families" sounds like hyperbole to me, but you are advocating for govt child rearing in leu of a strong family unit, which is a decidedly leftist proposition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2019, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Former land of plenty
3,212 posts, read 1,653,319 times
Reputation: 2017
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
THIS is why... Their average income earners pay a 45% national tax rate.

The effective national tax rate is in the second from the right column on page 9:

http://www.institutmolinari.org/IMG/...en-eu-2017.pdf

If you think you or anyone else thinks they can convince the average US income earner ($59,000/household) to pay a 45% effective federal tax rate, feel free to do so. We'll see if that happens...
If the socialist democracies are doing it, I'm fine with that. Try to convince their citizens to switch to our profit driven medical system that bankrupts people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top