Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:20 PM
 
2,561 posts, read 2,185,335 times
Reputation: 1672

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post

And the facts are that there was no underlying crime, therefore, no obstruction of justice.
That's not how obstruction of justice works. Often it does, but it is not required.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:23 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,224 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14919
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post
And none of the links you posted do not prove collusion or obstruction.
That is for the house Judiciary Committee to decide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:25 PM
 
9,254 posts, read 3,590,300 times
Reputation: 4852
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
This is the same Senator that believes a person is guilty until proven innocent as she did with the Kavenaugh hearing. In that hearing there was not one piece of evidence to verify Ford's allegations. Someone needs to remind her that simply saying something doesn't make it true. Senator Hirono has no respect for AG Barr, the President of the United States, or the Rule of Law. She wouldn't even give the AG a chance to respond to mudslinging outburst.
Why are you focused on the Senator? We know exactly to what Barr testified and exactly what Mueller wrote to Barr before that testimony. I don’t need some Senator to tell me that - at absolute best - Barr intentionally mislead Congress by failing to mention that Mueller himself had expressed his frustration with Barr’s summary. It would be fair to characterize Barr’s testimony as untruthful or a lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:25 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobdreamz View Post
May 1, 2019

Dear America,

You no longer have a Attorney General just another Trump acolyte masquerading as one.

Sincerely,

The American Democracy
Why?


Because he won’t let the DOJ become the Dem opposition research agency?

Did you feel the same way when Holder flat out said he was Obama’s “wingman”?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:26 PM
 
2,561 posts, read 2,185,335 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
slandering a good man because he’s on the other side
The guy could barely make it through a hearing without spinning every answer or looking like an idiot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:27 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusillirob1983 View Post
That's not how obstruction of justice works. Often it does, but it is not required.
I mean if you want to use all your time and efforts into trying to investigate “obstruction” be my guest
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:28 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
Quote:
Originally Posted by fusillirob1983 View Post
The guy could barely make it through a hearing without spinning every answer or looking like an idiot.

Nope. He did what he had to do. Make it clear that the Russia Trump stuff is over and make it clear the job of the DOJ is not to be the opposition research arm for Democrats
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:29 PM
 
25,449 posts, read 9,817,016 times
Reputation: 15344
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
IF Graham and CO are smart they will address the
letter today by reading the part that Mueller
said he doesn't object to Barr Summary just
the way it was reported in the media..

They are letting the media distort this..and it
needs to be called out in public at the hearing
for the record..I think that is partly why the Dems
are mad, he gets to be here at the Senate hearing
first to set the narrative..
Barr said he had not reviewed Mueller's evidence regarding obstruction prior to writing his so-called "summary."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:30 PM
 
2,561 posts, read 2,185,335 times
Reputation: 1672
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Jasper View Post
Trump's election is no longer in question as there is no "Russian Collusion" aka Democrat Denial. Trump's approval ratings are of no concern to me.

But, based on the Mueller Report, Barr, along with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, decided that the evidence collected by Mueller did not establish that Trump committed the crime of obstruction of justice.

So rather than post your opinion or desire, post facts.
https://www.usatoday.com/media/cinem...m-behind-barr/

I'm guessing Rosenstein's wife just said play both sides so you can get your pension. The man looks dead inside in this video.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2019, 08:30 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,103,684 times
Reputation: 6842
We all know why Dems are scared


Barr has made it clear that the abuses by Democrats and their loyalists won’t be swept under the rug
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top