Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Heres the thing. He did change the country for the better. Im not saying its true or isn’t. But he wasn’t just some celebrity, he literally was responsible for breaking down barriers.
Im sure many white supremacists are salivating over this.
This information has been out for quite some time. It's just that "news" (Fake News) wouldn't touch it.
As per the piece, he says that in 8 years when the tapes come out that America will be floored. It will be interesting just how repulsive they are...
This of course comes as no surprise to those who have known for years what "Dr." Michael was. A known plagiarist, dedicated Communist, and sexual deviant.
This is a bombshell report, particularly here in the #MeToo age, but for some reason has gotten little traction within the mainstream media. I wonder why that is? The wording of this particular article is pretty revealing in itself as to how hard it tries to hang on to the legacy narrative. It's clearly suggesting that the FBI reports are questionable. I mean, how many times can you use the words "claimed", "alleged" and "reportedly" in three paragraphs?
Is it time yet to tear down the statues and rename all of the streets dedicated in his honor?
Wasn't the FBI's job under Hoover to discredit and spread lies about anyone who was commusist, involved in civil rights or was deemed an enemy of the state.
Wasn't the FBI's job under Hoover to discredit and spread lies about anyone who was commusist, involved in civil rights or was deemed an enemy of the state.
The Rev. Ralph Abernathy even talked about how Dr. King liked hookers. So it does not sound like an FBI smear job.
It was common knowledge in the 60s. And the fact that he used plagiarism to get his doctorate was common knowledge too.
I personally don't care if MLK was engaged in cannibalism with regards to his thoughts and actions regarding Civil Rights.
Just like Thomas Jeffersons actions for the US are separate from the fact that he owned slaves etc.
Then you have any number of great kings, scholars etc. that advanced humanity through any number of means but were brutal killers and so forth.
In fact, watching someone being raped to death by an animal was entertainment during Roman times and they were a huge influence on most aspects of our daily lives.
In fact, watching someone being raped to death by an animal was entertainment during Roman times and they were a huge influence on most aspects of our daily lives.
Wasn't the FBI's job under Hoover to discredit and spread lies about anyone who was commusist, involved in civil rights or was deemed an enemy of the state.
Probably, but what are you suggesting? King didn't plagiarize his doctoral thesis? He wasn't a communist or a sexual deviant?
I did not know about this. One negative of Dr. MLK is that he was found to have plagiarized his doctoral thesis (and several of his other written works). BU decided not to retract his degree, however, because they felt his overall intellectual contribution (and greater contribution to society) outweighed this violation.
Dr. King's "extracurricular activities" were and are considered okay for men of color - for example, slapping around a prostitute, especially a white one, was/is not only acceptable and expected, it was/is considered a display of manliness.
Black guy I work with would kick your butt for saying something like that. Maybe the worst insult I’ve ever seen directed at black men.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.