Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The same unnamed sources and 'friends' who have made up the story. How convenient that unnamed sources are able to just pop up to make unsubstantiated claims.
The NYT and other media regularly correct and update stories, that is the difference with social media and bloggers that are regularly used as a news source. This is the way it has been for ages, not updating the story would have been considered bad journalism. The story was updated one day later, what about the rest of the article. Strange having Fox News criticizing the NYT for updating the story.
LMAO
Cmon man, this stuff keeps happening again, and again, and again.
Running the story in the first place is the bad journalism, updating it to include that o so important fact that HEY THE ALLEGED VICTIM DOESNT EVENT ATTEST TO THIS ACCUSATION, is them simply covering their asses, knowing that a fraction of the audience that read the original libelous story, will read the update.
It's not a mistake, it is 100 percent intentional.
Right or Left, all decent people involved in politics need to recognize that the media is absolutely broken and is simply just activism for either side based on the media organization.
Decent people should acknowledge this, not commend it
Reading about this over the weekend. What the NYT failed to include is the 'victim' has NO recollection of the incident. That's an important part of the story they left out. Wonder why?
Reading about this over the weekend. What the NYT failed to include is the 'victim' has NO recollection of the incident. That's an important part of the story they left out. Wonder why?
But they issued an update today, so that makes it ok, or something
Reading about this over the weekend. What the NYT failed to include is the 'victim' has NO recollection of the incident. That's an important part of the story they left out. Wonder why?
Read it again please. The victim said nothing. She refused. The friends of the victim asserted she had no memory of it. The question would be the memories of others present. The victim has not denied that it happened either.
Reading about this over the weekend. What the NYT failed to include is the 'victim' has NO recollection of the incident. That's an important part of the story they left out. Wonder why?
^^^ appears you are a faithful Fox & Friends sheeple.
Quote:
The report also found the FBI declined to follow up on any of the 25 witnesses Ramirez provided to confirm her allegation, and that the agency also did not investigate the new allegation, which accused Kavanaugh of forcing his penis into the hand of a female classmate while drunk. Ramirez has said the Supreme Court justice did something similar to her at another party, exposing his penis to her, forcing her to touch it in an attempt to get away.
Quote:
The authors were also told of a similar incident at a separate party by Kavanaugh’s classmate Max Stier, who currently runs a nonprofit in Washington, DC. Stier said he told senators and the FBI about his experience with Kavanaugh, alleging the justice forced his penis into the hand of a woman during his freshman year. The FBI did not investigate Stier’s claims, however.
Quote:
Nor did the agency interview anyone on the list of at least 25 people that Ramirez’s legal team provided in order to corroborate her story.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
