Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:02 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woody01 View Post
Sponsored by Cory Booker and Blumenthal.....read it carefully...... Although it may sound harmless to some liberals, this one is one step away from tyranny.

[i]"The bill will make it “unlawful for any individual to purchase or receive a firearm unless the individual has a valid Federal firearms license.”
Let me get this straight.

Unless the citizen fills out the right papers and gets the right govt approvals, the government will forbid him to buy a gun?

And the decision will be made within the government, deciding whether or not to approve him buying the gun?

I could have sworn I read something in the Constitution saying the government couldn't make those decisions.

Something about "infringing".

Was I wrong?

Help me out here......??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:07 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jowel View Post
I'm a different person than who I think you were responding to, but in response to your comment, car owners don't have a federal licensing but commercial vehicle owners do because driving one of these vehicles could be much more catastrophic than a small car if it's involved in an accident with another driver(s). This demands higher scrutiny to make sure that the drivers are of sound mind (hence stricter DUI laws for them, for example), know what they're doing, and aren't creating a danger to the public:

https://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/registrati...nse/compliance

So there already exists a rational basis and precedent for more stringent federal licensing for use of items that could pose a more imminent threat to the public is already there.
a CDL is NOT federally issued

My CDL is issued by New York State


what I am talking about a country drivers license, like most of Europe has

in Germany for example you get a German drivers license, not a Bavarian (region or state) drivers license



the guy I was responding to said
Quote:
Why nt make it so gun oweners have to be licensed? Car owners are.
I said nothing about his typing, as mine can be horrible too
but his suggestion (as we are in a thread about a senate bill (federal) was why not, we make drivers...…. my answer was about the difference between FEDERAL and STATE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:10 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,107 posts, read 4,602,134 times
Reputation: 10575
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
The 2nd Amendment says “shall not be infringed,” not “shall be licensed at the whim of hoplophobes.”
Of course you made the second part up , but if we're going to quote the Bill of Rights, I'll give you another example quoted correctly.

The first amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".

Even with such strong language prohibiting "abridging the freedom of speech" there's case law which limits free speech. An example would be laws prohibiting people being able to make threats and then attempt to claim the the first amendment gives them the right to do so.

Back to the second Amendment, case law going all the way up the Supreme Court has adjudicated the fact that the second amendment is not unlimited. In Heller v. District of Columbia, the Court stated:

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose. For example, concealed weapons prohibitions … possessions of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing condition and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."

Saying that the second amendment is unlimited is not only an oversimplification, it is simply not correct.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:11 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimRom View Post
I knew you’d defend Obama and the Democrats on the ACA. In your mind it’s perfectly acceptable for the left to demolish healthcare and force private citizens to do business with a third party.
Healthcare was demolished before the ACA came along. The ACA wasn't actually strong enough to fix what is wrong with the healthcare system. And millions of people who couldn't afford insurance now can, including me. Even the Republicans don't want to touch the ACA because too many of their constituents are one it. . But you never answered my question. Congress legally passed the ACA. However, Trump does everything he can to bypass Congress when it comes to getting funds for his pet projects. That's not how it works, but it doesn't matter to him. So tell me again who's the dictator?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:14 PM
 
Location: San Diego
50,241 posts, read 46,997,454 times
Reputation: 34045
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
I don't necessarily trust the government. But you can believe I really don't trust a bunch of yahoos running around wanting to be root'em toot 'em cowboys.
I seriously doubt you've seen any "cowboys" as you put it packing firearms. Fear


Nothing but fear

My advice is get out more, take some vacations and don't be afraid of other Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:17 PM
 
25,436 posts, read 9,793,288 times
Reputation: 15325
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
I seriously doubt you've seen any "cowboys" as you put it packing firearms. Fear


Nothing but fear

My advice is get out more, take some vacations and don't be afraid of other Americans.
I didn't say I was afraid. I think some of these gun nuts are a bit over the top though. I'm not the one who is scrambling to collect guns like they're marbles and talking big about protecting myself from the gubmint and everybody else. Now THAT sounds like fear. I don't see the need to get all het up about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,471,329 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
Healthcare was demolished before the ACA came along. The ACA wasn't actually strong enough to fix what is wrong with the healthcare system. And millions of people who couldn't afford insurance now can, including me. Even the Republicans don't want to touch the ACA because too many of their constituents are one it. . But you never answered my question. Congress legally passed the ACA. However, Trump does everything he can to bypass Congress when it comes to getting funds for his pet projects. That's not how it works, but it doesn't matter to him. So tell me again who's the dictator?
an apparently you, like most of the left doesn't get it....insurance is not care

EVERY American has access to health CARE...just open the yellow pages and pick a doctor....go to the doctor and receive the service

why dont liberals stop the lying...its not about access to CARE...its about who is going to pay YOUR bill
it's your body
it's your health
its the service YOU receive
its your bill...pay your own darn bill...dont EXPECT others to pay for you...NO-ONE should have to pay YOUR bill for you... have some pride man



and the problem is the government

the main problem we have here is the USA is OUR OWN GOVERNMENT RED TAPE
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:19 PM
 
Location: San Diego
18,718 posts, read 7,597,559 times
Reputation: 14988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jowel View Post
Of course you made the second part up , but if we're going to quote the Bill of Rights, I'll give you another example quoted correctly.

The first amendment says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".

Even with such strong language prohibiting "abridging the freedom of speech" there's case law which limits free speech.
Don't you love it when liberals try to take away your rights listed in the Constitution... by claiming laws made later somehow change what the Constitution plainly says?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:23 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,212,564 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by trobesmom View Post
How is passing a law through Congress dictatorial? Trump just bypasses Congress to get money he wants for his pet projects even though they hold the purse strings. So who's the dictator?
It’s unconstitutional. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2019, 07:25 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
6,107 posts, read 4,602,134 times
Reputation: 10575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roboteer View Post
Don't you love it when liberals try to take away your rights listed in the Constitution... by claiming laws made later somehow change what the Constitution plainly says?

I'm cool laws against someone threatening another person's life, even if it does limit speech. I'm glad the liberal or conservative or whoever came up with this did because I wouldn't want to be part of a society where people can go around making death threats and it's perfectly legal and okay for them to do so.

And as far as the quote about the second amendment not being "unlimited", that was delivered by US Supreme Court Antonin Scalia. I've never heard that he's a liberal- that's a first!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top