Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-10-2019, 04:30 PM
 
4,511 posts, read 1,866,885 times
Reputation: 7019

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
I wonder if the number crunchers factored in the losses across the corporation from lawsuits and boycotts due to outrage over the enhanced security?
Liberals: “You better let us steal whenever we want or we’ll form a mob and wreck your brand’s reputation!”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-21-2019, 06:01 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,363,103 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007 View Post

For both of them they have shared, surprisingly, that the majority of thefts and losses occur at suburban stores in wealthier white areas versus poorer, more minority districts.

The one who works at Walmart used to work at Publix and I remember the store that was closest to me (which is now a Walmart) was closed and "theft" was cited as the reason but my cousin told me that it was closed because of low sale revenue and that they didn't have any more losses than the average store in metro Atlanta. They ended up opening another store not too far from that neighborhood in a new development and they made more money there and had the same rates of theft/loss.

IMO they are testing this out to try to stop shop lifting in general and did it in that particular store because it wouldn't be allowed in a nicer area and poor people are less likely to complain since they don't want to lose their neighborhood store.

Here in Ohio, I know that one of our nicer Kroger's in a suburban community built a brand new liquor/wine section and made it it's own store because of the white people there (it is about 90% white population) stealing wine lol. But it is interesting they didn't put the wine aisle in a glass box to make them feel like they were caged up in wine prison. They built a beautiful store with their own cashier and a chime/alarm that goes off when anyone enters/exits that section.

At the Walmart I shop at, which is also in a majority white area (my SIL is one of the managers of the store), the white people steal a lot of lotion, laundry pods, perfume, etc., and so they have encased cabinets with these particular items. They had my mom's perfume a few weeks ago and we had to wait about 20 minutes for the clerks to find a manager to open the glass case for us since a couple people with keys who usually worked in that area had called off.
My neighborhood Walgreen's also has glass boxes for the razor blades, and higher value added cosmetics.

Demographics? 60% White, 30% Asian, and a cost of living index 3x the national average. A neighborhood, as MPowering would say, people pay a real premium to live there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:11 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top