Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What are you talking about? Mulvaney didn't bring in the Bidens in the briefing, but Trump did later per the Zelensky transcript - I even underlined it was Trump.
Thats what this fake news today is all about. Just introducing confusion to the story. Mulvaney admitted this pertained to wikileaks and thats it.
I'll connect the dots for you, my son.
Mulvaney says "yep, there was actually a quid pro quo", to which he adds "we do it all the time". Given that we already know Trump asked President Zelensky to "look into" alleged corruption by "the Bidens", that lends credence to the idea there was ALSO quid pro quo relating to the Biden investigation request.
It doesn't take Perry Mason to connect these dots.
He didn't have to. There was no other reason to hold the money up. However his buddy Mulvaney came right out with it. So there is that. As the Dems continue to build their case. Day. By. Day.
What does DOTARD mean then? Obviously two letters of his name plus TARD.
IS HE LATE?
Please provide the source of this name youre calling him.
Or lets just stop playing stupid. Orange is his skin and hair color and dotard is a play on retard.
Its not okay.
Wrong, again.
do·tard
/ˈdōdərd/
noun
an old person, especially one who has become physically weak or whose mental faculties have declined.
The "source" of the name? Why, it's Trump's very own best buddy Kim Jong Un, of course.
Except Biden didn't do it on behalf of "his son's company". He did it as official US foreign policy, on behalf of the the Administration, the G7 and the International Monetary Fund.
What "interest of the state" was Trump working toward?
When his son took a position on the board of directors Biden should have recused himself from all related matters. But that would be ridiculous since theres no way in hell Hunter would have got that except for the expected influence of Joe.
Maybe he should have, yep.
He didn't. It's not illegal. There is no evidence that Joe did something illegal on behalf of Hunter or Burisma.
Go ahead and hold that vote to impeach. Let's have a trial. Do it!!
Why? They're getting plenty done without it. Especially when you have people like Mulvaney get up on national television and tell people to get over that Trump does quid pro quo all the time, that politics runs foreign policy. Nice going, Mick. Didn't know you were playing for our team, buddy.
For Trump (in theory, since it's now getting walked back) to maintain thru Mulvaney that one of the investigative requests (DNC) made on July 25 was an acceptable quid pro quo but the second investigative request (Biden) had no connection to the military aid strikes me as a stretch.
Remember - other than some niceties - Crowdstrike and the Bidens were about the only things Trump had to talk about in that call. And then for it to turn out that even the so-called "acceptable" quid pro quo (DNC) appears now less justifiable per the DOJ disavowal???
Given this ^^^ (not to mention all the testimony to date) how credible is Trump on the Biden investigation request. All for the good of the USA but in the interim screw Ukrainian defense?
Yeah, it's kinda hard to spin it as faux news when it's coming straight from the horse's mouth, lol. Sure he wishes he could have Mulvaney do a Scooby Do ending.
[ mask removed ]
Fred, Velma and Daphne ( simultaneosly )
"It's Old Lady Clinton from the amusement park!"
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.