Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I am perfectly fine with "she didn't like Rudy doing whatever it was he was doing"
that would be perfectly fine. and legal .....
I am fine with "the Ukrainian president didn't like her. that's good
I am good with Trump and his team weren't comfortable with her because the thought maybe she might have some views that didn't match theirs.
period. no reasons needed. it doesn't matter one iota. Presidents get to remove people at will. Every. Single. President.
So why can’t he elaborate on the reasons why is this so difficult. If she did something to undermine him let’s hear it. It jus seems that Giuliani and his associates wanted her out of the way for some reason which at this point is undisclosed.
So, she's a witness for Trump, specifically stating she has no knowledge of Trump committing any illegal acts.
Neither do I. I have my suspicions, but I don't know. Neither do most people.
That is why the Inquiry is underway - to investigate whether he did or not. It could go either way, depending on the testimony given. It would sure be nice to hear from the principals though, Giuliani, Mulvaney, McGahn, and Pompeo, and let them attest to their innocence and the guiltnessless of Trump. That would go a long way towards making everyone believe there's nothing there.
Attacking a witness on Twitter while she's testifying is not a good look for an innocent man, however.
"When describing her qualifications for the job, the newly confirmed U.S. ambassador to Hungary cited a "product" she helped develop that is exported to "more than 100 countries, for daily consumption with more than 40 million viewers."
The product Colleen Bradley Bell produced is the soap opera The Bold and The Beautiful.
She was confirmed yesterday by the U.S. Senate, along with Noah Bryson Mamet. In his confirmation hearing, he acknowledged he had never visited Argentina, the country where he will serve as U.S. ambassador.
The big political donor who becomes an ambassador to a relatively small country is something of a Washington punch line and also a tradition. Presidents have done this for decades. But critics say the Obama administration has taken it too far."
Yet you have NOT even mentioned said "Political Appointee's" interfering with American interests?? So I ask~~ What's your POINT?
Sondland EU appointed Ambassador, actually DID interfere with Foreign Affairs and American Interests by directions of DJT in collusion with Giuliani, Rick Perry, etc.!!
I cannot get your comparison .. Sondland became of weapon to promote alternate American ( normal) agenda.. but there's ZERO historical evidence previous Political appointed Ambassadors EVER interfering with American Foreign agenda's.. EVER EVER!!
Sure looking forward to Sondland's testimony next week? I predict, a lot of 5th amendment declarations by him. He knows he was caught .. Knows he culpable... and sure he regrets ever wasting 1 million $$$$ to get involved with DJT!!
Not really. After 33 years (!!) in the post, her time to go has come. It happens. Welcome to the real world, Yovanovitch.
After 3 decades of successful work, time to switch gears.
Not a shocker and she serves at the pleasure of the President.
You heard her testimony today, she was impressive so why was it time to go. Certainly not because of her ability and experience. But if you think it’s time for her to go based on age I could think of one other person who’s past his time.
Neither do I. I have my suspicions, but I don't know. Neither do most people.
That is why the Inquiry is underway - to investigate whether he did or not. It could go either way, depending on the testimony given. It would sure be nice to hear from the principals though, Giuliani, Mulvaney, McGahn, and Pompeo, and let them attest to their innocence and the guiltnessless of Trump. That would go a long way towards making everyone believe there's nothing there.
Attacking a witness on Twitter while she's testifying is not a good look for an innocent man, however.
No no, it's the left/dem/libs who say trump did wrong....they have to prove trump did wrong and it's failing....Giuliani, Mulvaney, McGahn, and Pompeo, why would they do anything, when the left/dems/libs cannot provide anything factual...other than, we don't like trump, trump is not doing anything the normal way, trump is not following normal protocol.......
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
