Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Correct. 'Fascism' was a word coined by Mussolini, who started out as a persuaded socialist. IIRC he was editor of a socialist newspaper as a young man.
He decided that it would be better to have privately owned means of production, but with heavy regulation thereof. He formed a 'council of corporations' that micro-managed the Italian economy, for example setting production goals for companies. In effect it was 'socialism-lite.'
It was collectivist and therefore left of center, at least by today's general political spectrum.
This is very true. People on the left don't understand that Facsim is a collectivist ideology, and Fascism is a variant of Socialism. The only difference with Fascism is that it allows private property and corporations, but the government regulates business practices. Corporations don't profit, but must produce for the betterment and empowerment of the state, no different than government produce goods of Communism. Facism and Nazism are not right wing principles. Fascism and Nazism are just as left wing as Communism. Mussolini himself as a life long avid Socialist. He wrote for the Avanti a Socialist lefist paper in Italy. Both of Mussolini parents and both of his grand parents were avid socialist too. Also like Communist, Mussolini was against the Catholic Church. People don't understand. When Mussolini came to power in Italy. Lenin sent a telegram to Mussolini congratulated him coming to power.
Last edited by Checkmarkblue; 12-30-2019 at 09:39 PM..
wrong. Nazi is first and foremost ultra-nationalist. You don't understand political ideology. Go read a textbook that is not written by National Enquirer or Fox News then come back and talk to me.
Any extreme forms of Socialism Communism, Fascism, Baathism Nazism or anything authoritarian are very ultra Nationalist. These types of ideologies are no good, puts blames on certain groups of people for the ills of society. None of these such systems are no good and does not allow individual freedom.
The fact that you leftists have to return to an incident from three years ago, spouting your lies, tells me something.
And Antifia are rightists? And the anti-Israel BDS groups beating up Jews are rightists? And Tlaib who joined forces with an anti-Semitic group to fund her trip to Palestine is a rightist? And Omar with her "it's about the Benjamins" remark is a rightist? And the Democrat Councilman in DC who mimicked Farrakhan's remark that "Jews control the weather" is a rightist? And the leader of the Women's March, who fired a Jew from the leadership rank because "blacks wouldn't be comfortable with a Jew in a leadership role" is a rightist?
So what you're trying to say is that the truth is that people with torches marching in Charlottesville are really from the left? That certainly weren't representing the right?
In other words, you strongly believe that Trump absolutely never said the following, "You also had people that were very fine people, on both sides." - Donald Trump
Black Hebrew Israelite propaganda was found at the home of the nut case that attacked the five Jewish people with a machete. It's a delusional group of ex inmates that thinks they are the rightful descendants of Hebrews.
There are differing reports, the biggest one brought out by his parents that he wasn't involved with any groups and he was actually mentally ill. This and the JC shooting don't fit the methods of Hebrew Israelites. Hebrew Israelites just use scripture as their weapon and don't resort to terrorism and planned attecks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mike1003
They are as Jewish as elephants in a zoo (I'd a said monkeys, but then I would have been called a racist)
Correct, Hebrews Israelites aren't Jewish. Shemites, yeah. There's a ton of scholarship (etymological, genetic, historical, etc data to back there claims). H2N.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rachel976
Then he was influenced by a black supremacy group, if not an outright member of it.
This guy along with the shooters in JC aren't involved with Hebrew Israelites. These people probably saw them in the street and decided to act on their own. HI's are into the planned terrorist thing (the only thing HI's would do is meet across your street and shower you with scriptures).
In other words, you strongly believe that Trump absolutely never said the following, "You also had people that were very fine people, on both sides." - Donald Trump
I’m sorry, but who the hell *are* you? Certainly not someone familiar enough with me to speak for me, that’s for sure.
I never said that Trump never made that statement. Where did you come up with that? What I did say is that the “both sides” he was referring to was 1) the protestors who got a permit to march on behalf of Civil War era statues, and 2) the counter protestors who arrived to peacefully counter protest. Neither group was responsible for the chaos or death of anyone - it was the third party turds who showed up to make trouble that caused all the trouble in Charlottesville. The President’s statement was to that effect.
Please don’t speak for me again. You are certainly not in any position to.
Did you read the article? There was no blame placed on one side at all.
The narative needs to be directed away from race and parties and directed toward why we support a welfare state like Israel while the same people condemn it in our own country.
We shower Israel with billions of dollars a year while they have free healthcare for all. They should be paying for it themselves.
I’m sorry, but who the hell *are* you? Certainly not someone familiar enough with me to speak for me, that’s for sure.
I never said that Trump never made that statement. Where did you come up with that? What I did say is that the “both sides” he was referring to was 1) the protestors who got a permit to march on behalf of Civil War era statues, and 2) the counter protestors who arrived to peacefully counter protest. Neither group was responsible for the chaos or death of anyone - it was the third party turds who showed up to make trouble that caused all the trouble in Charlottesville. The President’s statement was to that effect.
Please don’t speak for me again. You are certainly not in any position to.
Hmm third party? He knew there was a third party of instigators or really a murderer early on?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
