Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 03-17-2020, 08:21 PM
 
19,848 posts, read 12,113,717 times
Reputation: 17578

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
Nope. The reason is not "government run healthcare system".

Check Norway, their response and results have been much better than that of US. Check Korea, etc.
I haven't been following Norway's results but do know that they had their first case three weeks ago and our first case was nearly 2 months ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-17-2020, 08:25 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,226,257 times
Reputation: 14408
Quote:
Originally Posted by villageidiot1 View Post
Both of these posts are 100% correct. We have a large minority in this country who have little actual knowledge of these topics, but have been brain washed by conspiracy theorists.
no doubt
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2020, 08:34 PM
 
4,974 posts, read 2,715,970 times
Reputation: 6950
Quote:
Originally Posted by CastletonSnob1 View Post
Grow up? So, I'm just supposed to shut up and deal with a terrible system?
Yes, you're supposed to shut up and not "complain and whine". Only good news needs to be reported. Bad news? Well, are you a conspiracy theorist nut? I didn't think so. So shut up and stick your head back into the ground. Only report good news.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2020, 09:44 PM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,496,494 times
Reputation: 9618
Quote:
Originally Posted by serger View Post
I'm not splitting anything, I told you who defeated Nazi Germany, with the scale of the Eastern front completely dwarfing everything else. I mean it was not even close.

Second, if anything is mass-made in emergency, it will have NOTHING to do with private insurance. Zilch. The point is, even that is not quick enough if the system is overwhelmed on a fast time scale.

Lastly, we don't have freaking testing in place. There was ton of time to have that ready, with no strain on the system. Do you understand that simple fact?
uhm...ww2 was about more than the eastern fromt or germany


we, the US beat Germany in Northern Africa..we, the US beat japan
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2020, 10:04 PM
 
8,154 posts, read 3,682,802 times
Reputation: 2724
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
uhm...ww2 was about more than the eastern fromt or germany


we, the US beat Germany in Northern Africa..we, the US beat japan
Different scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-17-2020, 10:49 PM
 
Location: California
37,138 posts, read 42,234,436 times
Reputation: 35021
It doesn't suck. It widespread and innovative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2020, 04:39 AM
 
Location: Boydton, VA
4,603 posts, read 6,371,820 times
Reputation: 10586
"Your understanding is wrong. People use ERs when they don't have health insurance because the ERs can't turn them away."...

No, your understanding is wrong. ER's are not required to treat non-emergent patients. Go in for a broken leg, fine, you will be treated...go in for sniffles, you are not guaranteed to be treated. The ER is entitled to deny service and refer you to your Primary....don't have a Primary....oh well. It it entirely up to the discretion of the facility to treat non-emergent cases.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) is a federal law.

Hospitals have three main obligations under EMTALA:

Any individual who comes and requests must receive a medical screening examination to determine whether an emergency medical condition exists. Examination and treatment cannot be delayed to inquire about methods of payment or insurance coverage. Emergency departments also must post signs that notify patients and visitors of their rights to a medical screening examination and treatment.

If an emergency medical condition exists, treatment must be provided until the emergency medical condition is resolved or stabilized. If the hospital does not have the capability to treat the emergency medical condition, an "appropriate" transfer of the patient to another hospital must be done in accordance with the EMTALA provisions.

Hospitals with specialized capabilities are obligated to accept transfers from hospitals who lack the capability to treat unstable emergency medial conditions.

Regards
Gemstone1
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2020, 05:12 AM
 
Location: A coal patch in Pennsyltucky
10,379 posts, read 10,673,235 times
Reputation: 12705
Quote:
Originally Posted by gemstone1 View Post
"Your understanding is wrong. People use ERs when they don't have health insurance because the ERs can't turn them away."...

No, your understanding is wrong. ER's are not required to treat non-emergent patients. Go in for a broken leg, fine, you will be treated...go in for sniffles, you are not guaranteed to be treated. The ER is entitled to deny service and refer you to your Primary....don't have a Primary....oh well. It it entirely up to the discretion of the facility to treat non-emergent cases.

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) is a federal law.

Hospitals have three main obligations under EMTALA:

Any individual who comes and requests must receive a medical screening examination to determine whether an emergency medical condition exists. Examination and treatment cannot be delayed to inquire about methods of payment or insurance coverage. Emergency departments also must post signs that notify patients and visitors of their rights to a medical screening examination and treatment.

If an emergency medical condition exists, treatment must be provided until the emergency medical condition is resolved or stabilized. If the hospital does not have the capability to treat the emergency medical condition, an "appropriate" transfer of the patient to another hospital must be done in accordance with the EMTALA provisions.

Hospitals with specialized capabilities are obligated to accept transfers from hospitals who lack the capability to treat unstable emergency medial conditions.

Regards
Gemstone1
That was a response to the post below. ERs may not be required to treat non-emergent patients, but if they can get reimbursed they will. Many hospitals opened up clinics or "urgicare" centers to avoid reimbursement issues. My local hospital opened up one next door to the ER.

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Yes, it does sound logical because when people get health care for free (mostly applicable to no/low-income), they use the ER instead of office visits for every sniffle, sneeze, and cough because the ER is more convenient, and they're not paying. Exactly what happened when Obamacare expanded Medicaid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2020, 05:30 AM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,061 posts, read 44,866,510 times
Reputation: 13718
Quote:
Originally Posted by villageidiot1 View Post
That was a response to the post below. ERs may not be required to treat non-emergent patients, but if they can get reimbursed they will. Many hospitals opened up clinics or "urgicare" centers to avoid reimbursement issues. My local hospital opened up one next door to the ER.
Exactly. That's what happened when Obamacare expanded Medicaid. Since Medicaid was paying ER-level reimbursements for those using the ER as a doctor's office for every little sniffle, sneeze, and cough, 2 things happened:

ER use skyrocketed.
Health care spending skyrocketed.

It was the exact opposite of what the Obamacare proponents predicted and promised. Give people completely free access to health care, and they 100% will prioritize their own convenience over using resources responsibly or controlling/reducing costs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2020, 06:22 AM
 
Location: Near Falls Lake
4,258 posts, read 3,178,135 times
Reputation: 4708
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Private insurance is more bureaucratic than Medicare.
Just curious, do you have medicare? What is the basis for your comparison?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top