Amy Coney Barrett, a candidate for the Supreme Court seat, claims the Bible precedes the Constitution. (Clarence Thomas, carry)

[1AngryTaxPayer]

Originally Posted by Mike930

Figures the desperate left trots this out. Very predictable. I’m sure racist is next.

Get ready for democratic sky screaming.

Queue the Subaru Karen screaming at Ginsberg.

[Quick Enough]

Originally Posted by jojajn

So much for trump nominating Constitutional judges.



Leading SCOTUS Candidate Amy Coney Barrett Claims Bible Precedes Constitution

"
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator'

The Declaration came BEFORE the Constitution and what our contry was founded on.

[ColoradoOnMyMind]

Lagoa is a safer pick here, save Amy for a Justice Thomas replacement down the road. We need balance in the court. Lagoa replacing RBG is a shift to the right, but not the huge shift that Barrett replacing RBG would be.

[2mares]

Originally Posted by Lyndarn

This notion of Roman Catholic belief as a huge fear when JFK was running for POTUS.... NOW it's A-Ok for DJT to nominate such a OLD notion candidate who wants's to dish the Constitution and force USA to adhere to "Old Testament doctrine.. Christ was sent to suffer for human frailties.

These notions are indoctrinated prior to Christianity .. ala Post Jesus sent to die on behalf of the flock for their sins.

So this women if a candidate wants to go BACK pre- Christian times and follow such un-evolved times~~

It speaks volumes about just where DJT's head wants for USA!!

I wonder if this person could even pass muster with GOP congress?????

Care to show where this information is coming from?

[cuebald]

Originally Posted by bobbythegreat

Well, we knew the attacks would be coming, guess this is the best you guys could come up with.

At least you aren't inventing rape allegations this time.

Saying that religion comes before the law is unconstitutional out of the gate for anyone who is a judge.

Next...

[2mares]

Originally Posted by katharsis

Well, anyone who would put his/her faith above the law does not deserve to be a judge . . . period!

I thought that the last thing I would want would be a liberal judge, but I would absolutely take that over someone like the above.

Can you show us what actions, exact word indicate she puts her faith above the law?

[2mares]

Originally Posted by cuebald

Saying that religion comes before the law is unconstitutional out of the gate for anyone who is a judge.

Next...

Can you quote or show actions where she has said or put religion before the constitution?

[atltechdude]

Amy is a nutcase bible thumper, exactly who Trump’s handlers want.

[Axxlrod]

Originally Posted by Statz2k10

I'm just wondering how many men she sexually assaulted in her college years. That's what I wanna know!

Well she does have 7 children. Dems will obviously ****-shame her and say she is sex-crazed.

[ColoradoOnMyMind]

Originally Posted by atltechdude

Amy is a nutcase bible thumper, exactly who Trump’s handlers want.

Trump doesn't have handlers like Biden. You forget he broke all the traditional rules while running for president. He will pick who he wants to pick and who he thinks can get confirmed.