Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat
LOL what "facts" about an invented rape allegation with no corroboration whatsoever are you talking about?
Honestly, you guys shouldn't "bother" inventing false rape allegations, it's one of the more disgusting things we've seen from Democrats in the last few years.....and that's really saying something given the ongoing terror campaign the DNC is waging against the American people.
Kavanugh's college roommate made allegations about both him lying under oath and his belligerence towards women when drunk that were never fully investigated by the deaf, dumb, and blind Republican Senate but keep on believing in fantasies if it makes you feel better.
Kavanugh's college roommate made allegations about both him lying under oath and his belligerence towards women when drunk that were never fully investigated by the deaf, dumb, and blind Republican Senate but keep on believing in fantasies if it makes you feel better.
None of that has anything to do with the false rape allegations that were invented by Democrats to try and stop the appointment.
Again, they were entirely baseless and had no corroboration whatsoever.
Suggesting that he lied under oath while addressing absurd allegations only meant to smear him is not particularly relevant since there's absolutely no EVIDENCE of it. Another random can make allegations that he was lying, just like a random made the initial allegations but given that they are all without supporting evidence, only a complete hack would accept them as fact.
To a leftie, a person of religious faith is 'dangerous' but someone out rioting and looting should be heralded as a hero. Bizarro world for sure.
Yup. a mob that riots, chases out the police from their own precinct, sets up an unlawful autonomous zone, loot, blackmails, terrorizes and murders two teens, this - elected Democrats call the "summer of love."
After months of riots, Burning, Looting, Murder, and a mob brakes your gate, storms you property, and shout that they want to rape and harm you - they don't get arrested, the frightened people in the house get arrested for arming themselves after 911 says the police cannot come.
Then, in Milwaukee, BLM mob shows up, and harasses a man fro seven hours, trespassing on his lawn, shining lights in his home, yelling insults and threats at him, and he is the one arrested because he is so frightened he arms himself in his home.
Then the DA charge him for being drunk, with a weapon? WTH?? So if you have a few drinks, so cannot defend yourself? Are we just supposed to let the mob burn the our house down because, to lay down and die, because we had a few drinks?
The thing is, a mob just like this one in Milwaukee burned and looted a house, and two teenagers were shot. That crowd got more and more agitated until all hell broke loose. Was the man above supposed to ignore what he has seen on the news for months now, and just lay down and die for the BLM mob?
In the twisted world of the Democrats, we all need to lay down for the mob, so they can burn, loot, assault, or murder us, or else we will be the ones arrested.
at least you and i can be thankful the Activist decided to die with her boots on..... because she could have had Obama replace her.... but she didn't...
To not be replaced by Obama was her fervent wish
And the thing is, she knew she had cancer back then and her years were numbered, and refused to step down.
The way that court is being abused for ideological and political games is a disgrace.
The process should be reformed: a permanent, updated pool of qualified candidates that meet all the formal criteria, from which a new judge is randomly selected whenever a vacancy arises.
And there should be a time limit, say, 10 years, for every judge.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbythegreat
None of that has anything to do with the false rape allegations that were invented by Democrats to try and stop the appointment.
Again, they were entirely baseless and had no corroboration whatsoever.
Suggesting that he lied under oath while addressing absurd allegations only meant to smear him is not particularly relevant since there's absolutely no EVIDENCE of it. Another random can make allegations that he was lying, just like a random made the initial allegations but given that they are all without supporting evidence, only a complete hack would accept them as fact.
Right, let's not look for evidence, let's just brand anything we don't like as baseless.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,411,082 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler
Great, she is correct!
Not according to the Constitution.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
