Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Does it bother you at all that state election boards, governors and state court judges can change the election process on the fly, in violation of the US Constitution, their own state constitution and their own state election laws, and even the SCOTUS refuses to get involved?
That means contrary to your opinion, it's not in violation of the US Constitution.
I haven't seen any actual proof that these rumors are true.
the covering windows did happen but they're leaving out the reason behind it. the mob tht had gathered were photo/videoing the counters, a violation of the law.the covering of the windows was to simply correct this.
if you truly believe this then petition some entity that would have stabding to challenge. ironically texas was just as guilty of actions they were suing georgia for. if the TX AG had sued TX he probably would have had standing in the SCOTUS.
Does it bother you at all that state election boards, governors and state court judges can change the election process on the fly, in violation of the US Constitution, their own state constitution and their own state election laws, and even the SCOTUS refuses to get involved?
We will never have faith in our federal or state elections if our election laws can be violated on the fly?
If those things happened, then it would bother me.
That means contrary to your opinion, it's not in violation of the US Constitution.
State election laws were not followed, there were unlawful changes made by governors and state election boards, that is not arguable, and it's sure as hell is not just my opinion.
the covering windows did happen but they're leaving out the reason behind it. the mob tht had gathered were photo/videoing the counters, a violation of the law.the covering of the windows was to simply correct this.
Ah, thanks. I hadn't seen that story, but yeah, the quote below spells it out. But it's more the "running off poll workers" and expanding scope of false claims that bothers me. One perfectly legal and sensible action took place at one ballot counting station, but it then snowballs into some nationwide scandal of additional false claims. The distortion is beyond belief. Propaganda at its finest.
Quote:
"Hundreds of challengers from both parties were inside the central counting board all afternoon and all evening; dozens of reporters were in the room too," Garcia said. "At all times, people outside the center could see in through windows that were further away from counting board work spaces."
if you truly believe this then petition some entity that would have stabding to challenge. ironically texas was just as guilty of actions they were suing georgia for. if the TX AG had sued TX he probably would have had standing in the SCOTUS.
Does it bother you or not, that election laws can be swept aside and changed on the fly by partisan governors and judges?
Do laws passed by a state legislature not matter, as long as deviations to those laws benefit your political allies??
State election laws were not followed, there were unlawful changes made by governors and state election boards, that is not arguable, and it's sure as hell is not just my opinion.
Prove it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.