Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-08-2021, 05:53 PM
 
6,829 posts, read 2,118,201 times
Reputation: 2591

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
Hah no it doesn't, the mortality rate of a disease is among people who have caught the disease. You generate a non-stop chain of hilarious responses that indicate a very fundamental misunderstanding of that which you post so much about.
The 1.8% mortality rate for Covid19 you're using is: {total deaths from Covid} / {confirmed Covid cases}. But actual mortality rate is calculated from total cases (not just confirmed cases). Obviously for Covid19, we're not catching all cases by some multiple. The mortality rate is estimated to be 0.5% for Covid19 for all ages, and falls once we remove 75+ age set, to something like a bad flu season.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2021, 05:53 PM
 
2,335 posts, read 815,448 times
Reputation: 1217
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
If you'd like I can provide examples of all, in fact I can provide all three from someone posting in this thread.
By all means do. And while you're at, explain the definition of anti-vaxxers and how you ascertain who fits that definition so we can ensure they fit your silly stereotype.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 05:58 PM
 
3,606 posts, read 1,659,254 times
Reputation: 3212
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
No, one cannot conclude from the existence of asymptomatic cases that "we've" been exposed, that is yet another link in the endless chain of false assumptions by you. USA has a mortality rate of about 1.8%, which classifies it as a very serious disease despite your attempts to downplay it.

The anti-vaxxer playbook:
1. This pandemic that has killed 570k Americans in a year is not serious.
2. These vaccines with very high efficacy don't work
3. These vaccines with very good safety record aren't safe

All of these are demonstrably false.
True...the anti-vaxx disinformation playbook infiltrates any topic on city data as well that mentions vaccines with many threads being closed by moderators as they devolve into bullying and personal attacks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 06:24 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,949,172 times
Reputation: 18156
Quote:
Originally Posted by lieqiang View Post
No, one cannot conclude from the existence of asymptomatic cases that "we've" been exposed, that is yet another link in the endless chain of false assumptions by you. USA has a mortality rate of about 1.8%, which classifies it as a very serious disease despite your attempts to downplay it.

The anti-vaxxer playbook:
1. This pandemic that has killed 570k Americans in a year is not serious.
2. These vaccines with very high efficacy don't work
3. These vaccines with very good safety record aren't safe

All of these are demonstrably false.
You can't get around the truth. Your opinions aren't truth. Name calling is not an argument.

To add: If you are assuming the majority of people AREN'T infected ... than the authorities have misinformed the public about the possible transmission rates. It's not as infectious as they were claiming.

So which is it:

Highly infectious and deadly? If so, the majority would be infected and/or sick and/or dead.

You are now claiming that's NOT true and that you are assuming that people have NOT been exposed. Which means it's NOT highly infectious and/or deadly.

Just unbelievable. Talking out of both sides of your mouth and coming to the same conclusion. Not logical.

Back to ... your OPINIONS aren't truth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 06:31 PM
 
18,458 posts, read 8,282,661 times
Reputation: 13784
well the "scientists" have said it's astronomically highly contagious..

...to the point we have to stay 6 ft apart, wear masks, and can't dance at weddings

China was welding doors shut to keep people isolated even....the whole world shut down because it's so contagious

I find it beyond comprehension...that after over a year....we have not all been exposed....at least once
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 06:49 PM
 
Location: NMB, SC
43,124 posts, read 18,281,341 times
Reputation: 34994
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corrie22 View Post
well the "scientists" have said it's astronomically highly contagious..

...to the point we have to stay 6 ft apart, wear masks, and can't dance at weddings

China was welding doors shut to keep people isolated even....the whole world shut down because it's so contagious

I find it beyond comprehension...that after over a year....we have not all been exposed....at least once
But you can protest in the street with no restrictions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 07:15 PM
 
8,158 posts, read 3,680,515 times
Reputation: 2720
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
You can't get around the truth. Your opinions aren't truth. Name calling is not an argument.

To add: If you are assuming the majority of people AREN'T infected ... than the authorities have misinformed the public about the possible transmission rates. It's not as infectious as they were claiming.

So which is it:

Highly infectious and deadly? If so, the majority would be infected and/or sick and/or dead.

You are now claiming that's NOT true and that you are assuming that people have NOT been exposed. Which means it's NOT highly infectious and/or deadly.

Just unbelievable. Talking out of both sides of your mouth and coming to the same conclusion. Not logical.

Back to ... your OPINIONS aren't truth.
The virus us highly infections with a R0 around 3. Countermeasures brought it down but not enough to control it, at least not in this country and multiple others. Kindergarten math is an important subject, not to be skipped.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 08:32 PM
 
1,094 posts, read 499,531 times
Reputation: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMSRetired View Post
But you can protest in the street with no restrictions.
Totally this, along with fact that travelers to America and even Americans themselves are supposed to get vaccinated and we're supposed to even get vaccine passports with an experimental chemical with no long term studies to show it's safe. But then people are allowed to walk right across the border without getting tested at all and disappear in US society? And people from countries like India with the worst COVID outbreak and vaccine resistant mutants are allowed for weeks to just fly into the USA? The self appointed COVID19 police are totally inconsistent, and this why two thirds of American adults don't trust them when they try to push vaccines on us, esp on our kids and grandkids at low risk of.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2021, 09:17 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,110 posts, read 41,284,508 times
Reputation: 45170
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arya Stark View Post
And it appears now the vaccine will not work for those who are immunosuppressed.

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infecti...vaccines/91631
That is not news, just confirmation of the same situation that exists with all vaccines.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenPineTree View Post
The 1.8% mortality rate for Covid19 you're using is: {total deaths from Covid} / {confirmed Covid cases}. But actual mortality rate is calculated from total cases (not just confirmed cases). Obviously for Covid19, we're not catching all cases by some multiple. The mortality rate is estimated to be 0.5% for Covid19 for all ages, and falls once we remove 75+ age set, to something like a bad flu season.
Sure, take out the 75 + and, BINGO!, the numbers look better.

Since you cannot reliably know the total number of cases of either measles or COVID-19, the case fatality rate is used rather than mortality rate. Then you compare case fatality rates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2021, 04:51 AM
 
1,706 posts, read 637,010 times
Reputation: 1857
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
For an illnesss with a 99% recovery rate?
Yes, for the virus with a 99% recovery rate, anti-vaxxers would never be satisficed with the vaccine, no matter how many years of testing that it goes through. Whats so hard to understand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top