Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You have obviously not read about this vaccine at all. Or even heard anything on the news about it. Start by looking up mRNA and thinking about the explanation as to how such a "vaccine" works.
And NO, I'm not talking about you growing an arm out of the back of your head. That's not the genetic alteration I was referring to. But then, you already knew that before you were framing my post as such, didn't you?
mRNA vaccines don't "alter your genes/genetics". You need to do more "research", evidently.
Much of my research is confirmed by what the doctors talked about in the 2 hour video or have you not listened to it yet?
It's sad when people are not open-minded to listen to what these doctors are talking about for fear that maybe, must maybe they made a mistake in getting vaxxed.
Their point is "to do no harm"... What if these vaccines are doing harm?
Many of us in medicine started out completely open minded. But at some point, and in my case that was well over a year ago, it becomes obvious that so many of these Pandemic related videos starring an unvetted announcer, are based on political motivations coming from the right. And not only lacking in peer reviewed data, but very anecdotal in so many cases.
'First do no harm' is a very important driving force in medicine. But there are times when risks need to be taken. And the Pandemic has and will present us with many of those risks. Where if we do not tackle them, many more will get sick and die due to our inaction. Pandemics are much like War in some ways, and sacrifices need to be made in order to win.
Many of us in medicine started out completely open minded. But at some point, and in my case that was well over a year ago, it becomes obvious that so many of these Pandemic related videos starring an unvetted announcer, are based on political motivations coming from the right. And not only lacking in peer reviewed data, but very anecdotal in so many cases.
'First do no harm' is a very important driving force in medicine. But there are times when risks need to be taken. And the Pandemic has and will present us with many of those risks. Where if we do not tackle them, many more will get sick and die due to our inaction. Pandemics are much like War in some ways, and sacrifices need to be made in order to win.
I'm not going to argue with you about this because you obviously do not want to be honest about the mechanics of how this vaccine works and how it is different from "normal" vaccines.
So let's take a different approach confronting two factors that NOBODY on this thread has touched so far besides me:
2) Why did every researcher, developer, and manufacturer insist in full legal immunity before releasing the vaccine? That is essentially a blank check. If everyone who took the vaccine fell over dead tomorrow, you wouldn't even get an oops from the developers. Because they have no legal responsibility to even offer an oops. No lawsuits. No discussion. All you would get is something along the lines of "Our experiment failed." That's Dr. Mengele territory.
How many lawsuits have you seen on TV about this or that medicine or product being found to be dangerous after having been approved by the FDA or CDC or whatever alphabet soup? Well, if things go south on this one, we don't even have that in this case. Just a bunch of dead lab rats.
Now, you can frame that any way you like. Bottom line for me is that I do not trust it. End of story for now.
Many of us in medicine started out completely open minded. But at some point, and in my case that was well over a year ago, it becomes obvious that so many of these Pandemic related videos starring an unvetted announcer, are based on political motivations coming from the right. And not only lacking in peer reviewed data, but very anecdotal in so many cases.
'First do no harm' is a very important driving force in medicine. But there are times when risks need to be taken. And the Pandemic has and will present us with many of those risks. Where if we do not tackle them, many more will get sick and die due to our inaction. Pandemics are much like War in some ways, and sacrifices need to be made in order to win.
For people in the highest risk category, taking the vaccine, unapproved as it is, might make sense. But for young and healthy people, taking the vaccine doesn't present the same urgency, since their risk factor is low. Not getting the vaccine for those people makes sense, ordering them to take the vaccine against their will is wrong.
One thing I am just throwing out for those who believe the REALLY dire predictions (such as the one doctor who, according to the summary at the end of the link, said that anyone who has taken the vaccine will be dead within three years) -- what do you think will be the reaction of most people if, God forbid, he is correct about possibly 70% of Americans dying?
For people in the highest risk category, taking the vaccine, unapproved as it is, might make sense. But for young and healthy people, taking the vaccine doesn't present the same urgency, since their risk factor is low. Not getting the vaccine for those people makes sense, ordering them to take the vaccine against their will is wrong.
Everyone's risks are different.
Never without consent.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
