Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What are the reasons abortion advocates want pregnant women who don't want their babies, to kill their unborn babies, when alternative plans such as offering the child up for adoption are available? What have you found to justify such deliberate killing?
I suggested in another thread (an odd one suggesting "compromise for abortion") that many of them do it for reasons of either convenience or irresponsibility. Predictably, I was called names and told my ideas were "disgusting". And then that thread got closed.
So, you abortion advocates who want pregnant women to kill their unborn babies rather than give birth and offer them up for adoption (or other such plan), please tell us your reasons.
------------------------------
(Mods: If this violates whatever caused that other thread to be closed, please just delete this one, OK?)
Forced birthers- why do you want to force a woman to give birth to a child with such extreme birth defects that they will live less than a week and then die a horrible painful death?
To a leftist and skanks of all races, a fetus is nothing more than a 7 month inconvenience. We live in a "ME" society. Why would they want to be burdened with that responsibility? They weren't responsible enough to practice abstinence or use protection or the pill, so they definitely are not mature enough to handle a responsibility of that magnitude.
What are the reasons abortion advocates want pregnant women who don't want their babies, to kill their unborn babies, when alternative plans such as offering the child up for adoption are available? What have you found to justify such deliberate killing?
I suggested in another thread (an odd one suggesting "compromise for abortion") that many of them do it for reasons of either convenience or irresponsibility. Predictably, I was called names and told my ideas were "disgusting". And then that thread got closed.
So, you abortion advocates who want pregnant women to kill their unborn babies rather than give birth and offer them up for adoption (or other such plan), please tell us your reasons.
------------------------------
(Mods: If this violates whatever caused that other thread to be closed, please just delete this one, OK?)
I don’t support late term abortion. I’ve heard all the arguments, etc. it’s a life at three months it’s not a life before three months, on and on the arguments go. So aside from that, to answer you question indirectly, it’s not just as cut and dry and as simple as “have baby give it up for adoption“. Going through a full pregnancy and giving birth to a living human being is a big deal. A woman’s body is forever changed once she gives birth to a child. Maybe she doesn’t want those changes. Maybe she doesn’t want to sit up in bed one day 30 years down the road and wonder whatever happened to her adopted child. As long as she aborts early, I don’t have an issue. But I do personally think late term abortion‘s are evil. They are in fact murder.
Forced birthers- why do you want to force a woman to give birth to a child
Nobody is forcing her to give birth, except Mother Nature. Plus, of course, herself, who had sex while knowing well that that often results in pregnancy. I frequently see people trying to pretend somebody else is forcing her to do something... as they try mightily to avoid answering a simple question.
To a leftist and skanks of all races, a fetus is nothing more than a 7 month inconvenience. We live in a "ME" society. Why would they want to be burdened with that responsibility? They weren't responsible enough to practice abstinence or use protection or the pill, so they definitely are not mature enough to handle a responsibility of that magnitude.
Yeah, because no older right wing women (married too, no doubt) ever have abortions.
If you think there’s no women approaching 50 that are in stable long term relationships and really don’t want another baby when their children are all in high school and going off to college, think again.
Yeah, because no older right wing women (married too, no doubt) ever have abortions.
If you think there’s no women approaching 50 that are in stable long term relationships and really don’t want another baby when their children are all in high school and going off to college, think again.
If they know this then they should be practicing responsible sex. In most cases, abortion is nothing more than a quick fix for irresponsible behavior and poor choices.
If women could be paid to carry a baby to term for adoption, I think more would do it. It would be under the guise of helping desperate infertile couples become parents. Win-win for all.
You got clear answers in the last thread. Women are not breeding stock for the adoption market. They don’t want to remain pregnant for 9 months. Labor and deliver. There are women who do adopt out which is her choice.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
