Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Forced birthers- why do you want to force a woman to give birth to a child with such extreme birth defects that they will live less than a week and then die a horrible painful death?
What percentage of pregnancies result in such extreme cases (as you call it)?
I would accept that... if they didn't keep making babies they didn't want. I am asking why they consider killing their unborn child, as a preferable act.
Yes, that's clear. They don't want the inconvenience of pregnancy and delivery, and feel that the unborn child's life is not worth protecting in her quest for a more rapid solution. In a word, irresponsibility.
Kudoes to them, they are finding a solution that doesn't involve killing the unborn child.
But this thread is about the people (women and men) who are fine with simply killing the unborn baby.
You folks, what are your reasons for choosing to kill the unborn baby instead of bringing it to term, giving birth, and offering it up for adoption?
The part YOU are not getting is pregnancy and delivery are much more than an INCONVENIENCE. You keep glossing over that part.
And nobody is killing an unborn baby in the early months of pregnancy. It is a fetus, which is not a baby.
I would accept that... if they didn't keep making babies they didn't want. I am asking why they consider killing their unborn child, as a preferable act.
Yes, that's clear. They don't want the inconvenience of pregnancy and delivery, and feel that the unborn child's life is not worth protecting in her quest for a more rapid solution. In a word, irresponsibility.
Kudoes to them, they are finding a solution that doesn't involve killing the unborn child.
But this thread is about the people (women and men) who are fine with simply killing the unborn baby.
You folks, what are your reasons for choosing to kill the unborn baby instead of bringing it to term, giving birth, and offering it up for adoption?
Asked and answered. Over and over. You don’t like the answers. Your emotional descriptions, killing, not worth protecting, is your view of abortion. Others think differently. One size doesn’t fit all.
What are the reasons abortion advocates want pregnant women who don't want their babies, to kill their unborn babies, when alternative plans such as offering the child up for adoption are available? What have you found to justify such deliberate killing?
I suggested in another thread (an odd one suggesting "compromise for abortion") that many of them do it for reasons of either convenience or irresponsibility. Predictably, I was called names and told my ideas were "disgusting". And then that thread got closed.
So, you abortion advocates who want pregnant women to kill their unborn babies rather than give birth and offer them up for adoption (or other such plan), please tell us your reasons.
------------------------------
(Mods: If this violates whatever caused that other thread to be closed, please just delete this one, OK?)
I am not an abortion advocate. Very few people are. Because it is certainly none of my business what a woman does with her unwanted pregnancy, who I might not even know. For me to tell a pregnant woman decided on abortion, who I don't know, she must not get an abortion would be about as welcome to hear as me telling her she should lose weight. But what if I know her, and I am the father of the baby the woman wants to abort, but I want? Interesting how I never see any threads about what rights, if any, a father should have to his unborn child the woman wants to abort.
Last edited by StillwaterTownie; 09-11-2021 at 09:44 PM..
What percentage of pregnancies result in such extreme cases (as you call it)?
Somewhere between 15-30% of all pregnancies depending on the numbers you're looking at. Early miscarriage because of a non-viable fetus is far more common than most people realize.
What are the reasons abortion advocates want pregnant women who don't want their babies, to kill their unborn babies, when alternative plans such as offering the child up for adoption are available? What have you found to justify such deliberate killing?
I suggested in another thread (an odd one suggesting "compromise for abortion") that many of them do it for reasons of either convenience or irresponsibility. Predictably, I was called names and told my ideas were "disgusting". And then that thread got closed.
So, you abortion advocates who want pregnant women to kill their unborn babies rather than give birth and offer them up for adoption (or other such plan), please tell us your reasons.
------------------------------
(Mods: If this violates whatever caused that other thread to be closed, please just delete this one, OK?)
The things you call conveniences are mainly needs and quality of life standards. Adequate food and shelter for yourself and any pre-existing children is not a convenience. The ability to complete a high school/college education is not a convenience. Etc.
The question you ask is an intellectually dishonest question.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
