Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
just so you know....the rate of sea level rise in San Francisco has been flat out consistent for the over 100 years....global warming and ice melting has had zero effect on the rate of sea level rise in San Francisco
for the past 100 years....the rate of sea level rise has been 0.077 inch a year....less than 1 inch a decade
.....0.65 feet in 100 years
less than 8 inches in 100 years.......8 inches is one cement block
Everywhere the climate alarmists claim the sea level is rising is near large cities: Miami, New York City and Boston to name just a few. In Boston the area of the city with the newest developments is the seaport district. They have demolished many older, low-rise, warehouse type developments and replaced it all with large, super-heavy, concrete highrises. The believers in climate change assume the water level is rising but I wonder if the land is compacting as heavier, denser, seaside development puts immense weight on the coastal bedrock? This type of development is happening in almost all coastal cities.
That is my hypothesis. I would be flattered if some geologists and engineers take it and run with it.
False disinformation. National Geographic is a more honest and reliable source, wouldn't you agree?
"However, more recent analyses, dating back decades, have found that many of even the earliest models were remarkably accurate in their predictions of global temperature increases. Now, as computing power increases and more and more refinements are added to modeling inputs, modelers are more confident in defending their work.
A model from 1970 predicted "global temperatures would increase by 0.57 degrees Celsius (1.03 degrees Fahrenheit) between 1970 and 2000. The actual recorded warming was a remarkably close 0.54°C (0.97°F)."
False disinformation. National Geographic is a more honest and reliable source, wouldn't you agree?
"However, more recent analyses, dating back decades, have found that many of even the earliest models were remarkably accurate in their predictions of global temperature increases. Now, as computing power increases and more and more refinements are added to modeling inputs, modelers are more confident in defending their work.
A model from 1970 predicted "global temperatures would increase by 0.57 degrees Celsius (1.03 degrees Fahrenheit) between 1970 and 2000. The actual recorded warming was a remarkably close 0.54°C (0.97°F)."
The worst part of this is the melting at the poles more recently Antarctica although the Arctic is worse. We didn't need 2021 to prove that climate change is real, it's been happening for decades but if this year didn't get your attention nothing will.
Fake news. Even the global warming religion admitted that all early computer models were wrong.
It's always amusing when people call NASA and other respected scientists part of a religion, sounds backwards since some republicans think only god can change the climate.
How many more people have to die and how many more people have to lose their homes before we finally unite and agree that climate change is a very serious threat to all of us?
Maybe next year.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
