Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will you be watching the House January 6 Committee hearing?
YES-WATCHING 70 24.56%
NO-NOT WATCHING 215 75.44%
Voters: 285. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:08 PM
 
13,452 posts, read 4,292,364 times
Reputation: 5390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ipaper View Post
Why would you call her trash? Obviously, the Trump team didn't think she was trash, to have her working in the White House inner circle. It's like anybody who speaks against Trump gets discredited, even though they voted for and supported the president.

She is lower level and she wasn't there and this is all hearsay. I don't think she is trash. Her testimony is trash and the Kangaroo court is a bigger trash. You never put hearsay in any court or congressional hearing. If the hearing verified the hearsay with direct sources then they don't need her hearsay testimony.

 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:08 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,869,570 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
You are an attorney? Hearsay doesn't go far in any American court. A witness has to say that the people involved directly with the accused told her that but she didn't. No judge would allow this to a jury.

That's like accusing Judge Kavanaugh of raping the H.S. party on a hearsay from people that weren't there and no direct connection to anybody involved in the event. Democrats tried that during the confirmation but it didn't work.
Some of what she said wasn’t hearsay
And if people won’t testify first hand then they probably can’t truthfully refute what she said
Call the Secret Service guys
No executive privilege there
Call any of the stewards, maids working in the West Wing/White House
Love to hear what they overheard cleaning up Trump’s fits
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:09 PM
 
Location: Bronx, New York
4,437 posts, read 7,673,992 times
Reputation: 2054
"if she is not contradicted, [Hutchinson] has nailed the greatest conspiracy, criminal and seditious, against the Republic of the United States since the Civil War, and Jefferson Davis. Jefferson Davis was a member of Congress. He was not the President of the United States. No President, [including Richard Nixon], has engaged in anything, like we've heard, today.....!"
--Carl Bernstein
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:11 PM
 
13,452 posts, read 4,292,364 times
Reputation: 5390
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnBoy64
Methinks Peter Alexander is getting played...these are anonymous sources.

but the hearing can use hearsay. LOL
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:13 PM
 
13,452 posts, read 4,292,364 times
Reputation: 5390
Quote:
Originally Posted by loves2read View Post
Some of what she said wasn’t hearsay
And if people won’t testify first hand then they probably can’t truthfully refute what she said
Call the Secret Service guys
No executive privilege there
Call any of the stewards, maids working in the West Wing/White House
Love to hear what they overheard cleaning up Trump’s fits
Hearsay: information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor:
Tell me what part she had direct contact with the President?


I love to hear what all secret agents have to say since JFK days.
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:17 PM
 
Location: sumter
12,970 posts, read 9,656,695 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
She is lower level and she wasn't there and this is all hearsay. I don't think she is trash. Her testimony is trash and the Kangaroo court is a bigger trash. You never put hearsay in any court or congressional hearing. If the hearing verified the hearsay with direct sources then they don't need her hearsay testimony.
But nobody inside that White House inner circle, have pushed back on anything she said except Trump on his social media.
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:19 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,869,570 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
Pelosi won't let the FBI testify under oath, what makes you think she will allow the S.S. and the driver testify to kill the testimony of her hearsay witness. This is a kangaroo court not to find the truth.
Nothing to back your statement up
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:20 PM
 
37,315 posts, read 59,869,570 times
Reputation: 25341
Quote:
Originally Posted by ipaper View Post
But nobody inside that White House inner circle, have pushed back on anything she said except Trump on his social media.
And they have some of Meadows’s texts and other communiqués
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:20 PM
 
Location: sumter
12,970 posts, read 9,656,695 times
Reputation: 10432
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanJuanStar View Post
but the hearing can use hearsay. LOL
Much of what she said today, was her firsthand account and not just hearsay.
 
Old 06-28-2022, 08:21 PM
 
13,422 posts, read 9,952,903 times
Reputation: 14357
Quote:
Originally Posted by ipaper View Post
But nobody inside that White House inner circle, have pushed back on anything she said except Trump on his social media.
Can anyone post Trump’s rebuttal? All I’ve seen so far is that he didn’t give her a job, and as usual he didn’t know who she was. Even though he knew not yo give her a job. Usual Trump nonsense.

Would be interested to see if he actually refuted the steering wheel testimony. Time stamped prior to the news that anonymous sources said the SS would testify, of course. (Not saying he didn’t, just that I haven’t seen it if so.)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top