Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So is not reporting? O.K. He went to her to chat because that's what S.S agents do, chat and violated an oath to report an incident in the car that had NOTHING to do with her or her job. OK
I don’t know why you’re arguing with me about it. Her testimony was that she heard him say those things, with Bobby Engel in the room. If she didn’t, they can testify otherwise and she can be charged with perjury.
I don’t know either their or she’s motivation nor whether they did or didn’t.
Looking forward to their testimony. All their testimony.
Allegedly is the key word here lol, I have been reading on the news sites and forum sites, leftist, democrats, viewers comments he did, not allegedly. So President Trump allegedly moved from his back seat, to the front seat and grabbed the steering wheel and assaulted this agent, by grabbing him by the neck, and the driver did not loose control of the limo and did not crash into anything, :rofl: lol again.
why didn't they call the Secret Agents in the 1st and 2nd impeachments or the Russian gate? They are with the President 24/7. Make them take the oath. That's their job to chat with lower level employees about their job and details with people that don't need to know.
Perhaps it is highly unusual for them to testify against the person they’re protecting.
I don’t know.
Anyway, the source says they’re willing to come forward, not that they’re being called. Of course that hadn’t actually happened yet. But I hope it does. Once they’re under oath, they’ll have to answer to all of what they witnessed. You may or may not want that. We’ll see.
I don’t know why you’re arguing with me about it. Her testimony was that she heard him say those things, with Bobby Engel in the room. If she didn’t, they can testify otherwise and she can be charged with perjury.
I don’t know either their or she’s motivation nor whether they did or didn’t.
Looking forward to their testimony. All their testimony.
But let's go back to the original topic. Why put her on as a witness if they haven't got the statements from the people that actual were with the President? Why they need to call them now. Should they have verify this before calling her? If it's true, they don't need a hearsay that wasn't there, they have direct witnesses.
Secret Service lead and presidential driver are prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab steering wheel or lunge at agents to drive himself to Capitol on January 6.
But let's go back to the original topic. Why put her on as a witness if they haven't got the statements from the people that actual were with the President? Why they need to call them now. Should they have verify this before calling her? If it's true, they don't need a hearsay that wasn't there, they have direct witnesses.
Secret Service lead and presidential driver are prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab steering wheel or lunge at agents to drive himself to Capitol on January 6.
Pelosi has to clear this or the whole hearing is really a Kangaroo court.
I agree this needs clarification. I do not agree that it nullifies the entire hearing. They aren’t disputing anything else. Or, at least I haven’t seen it if they are.
And they aren’t calling them - they have apparently decided to come forward. Allegedly. That hasn’t actually happened yet.
ETA - according to your link, the SS will respond to the testimony on the record, as they have been cooperating with the committee since 2021.
Perhaps it is highly unusual for them to testify against the person they’re protecting.
I don’t know.
Anyway, the source says they’re willing to come forward, not that they’re being called. Of course that hadn’t actually happened yet. But I hope it does. Once they’re under oath, they’ll have to answer to all of what they witnessed. You may or may not want that. We’ll see.
They are not supposed to talk about anything about their job to anybody except their superiors. That's not how Secret Agent works. Just like Navy Seals and the Special units in the military. They don't talk to anyone about their jobs only to their superiors. They don't go chatting to lower ranks about their job in the galley or gym. I doubt her story.
But let's go back to the original topic. Why put her on as a witness if they haven't got the statements from the people that actual were with the President? Why they need to call them now. Should they have verify this before calling her? If it's true, they don't need a hearsay that wasn't there, they have direct witnesses.
Secret Service lead and presidential driver are prepared to testify under oath that Trump did NOT grab steering wheel or lunge at agents to drive himself to Capitol on January 6.
Pelosi has to clear this or the whole hearing is really a Kangaroo court.
I would give credence to what someone says under oath more than a newspaper article. The best example are the Trump officials who when under oath contradicted what they were saying in faux.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.