Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Maybe Google secret service scandals. There’s been a few. The boys like to party.
Nah, those people are tight. They ar tighter than the Navy Seals and the Seals are very tight. You need top secret clearance to have that job to be 24/7 with the President and family and people with loose lips never get that far, not even half way.
Nah, those people are tight. They ar tighter than the Navy Seals and the Seals are very tight. You need top secret clearance to have that job to be 24/7 with the President and family and people with loose lips never get that far, not even half way.
Worried you’ll learn the truth? Prostitution, being duped by imposters breaching White House grounds. Not so tight, they seem to have a serious breech every few years.
Nah, those people are tight. They ar tighter than the Navy Seals and the Seals are very tight. You need top secret clearance to have that job to be 24/7 with the President and family and people with loose lips never get that far, not even half way.
There doesn’t appear to be any dispute that a conversation took place.
Not that they’ve stated publicly anyway (via sources, allegedly).
No, Pelosi rejected the people in the minority side to ask questions, so this is not a trial, this is a 1 sided public Kangaroo court.
Pelosi could have picked 2 PRO Trump people to balance it out but she didn't. The whole table voted to impeached Trump. How is that balance?
How is Ivanka not pro Trump?
Everyone testifying practically is pro Trump. For pro Trumpers, there’s certainly a lot of damming testimony. Either he did the things they were asked or he didn’t.
There doesn’t appear to be any dispute that a conversation took place.
Not that they’ve stated publicly anyway (via sources, allegedly).
There is a dispute. It's on the news and unless all the people in the car with the President can verify it under oath it's garbage and it goes against Secret Agent protocol to speak to a junior level staff about Secret Service activity. They only report to their superiors.
Why would a lead secret service agent have a "conversation" with her about his job activity when she has nothing to do with it.? He doesn't report to her or asks her opinion to what to do.
There is a dispute. It's on the news and unless all the people in the car with the President can verify it under oath it's garbage and it goes against Secret Agent protocol to speak to a junior level staff about Secret Service activity. They only report to their superiors.
Why would a lead secret service agent have a "conversation" with her about his job activity when she has nothing to do with it.? He doesn't report to her or asks her opinion to what to do.
Oh? Can you cite the dispute that there was a conversation? I may have missed it.
Another fair impartial juror. Trump deserves a chance to question all the witnesses against him and bring his own but you are telling me he doesn't deserve it because Pelosi is fair?
Pelosi should had verified her hearsay witness before the hearing began and they wouldn't need her hearsay. You act like they never pulled this cr@p before. They didn't with Judge Kavanaugh and the circus of a hearing. The difference is at least Kavanaugh had a defense and both sides questioned everybody and brought witnesses. Trump doesn't.
You can blame McCarthy and the GOP for not putting more members on the panel to push back. They had their chance, but decided to throw a tantrum instead.
Everyone testifying practically is pro Trump. For pro Trumpers, there’s certainly a lot of damming testimony. Either he did the things they were asked or he didn’t.
The people asking the questions are anti-Trump. They voted for his impeachment. They only want a narrative so they ask their questions to get their answers. There is not an other side to challenge so their narrative is what gets pushed to the public. Stop with the garbage this is a fair hearing.
The people asking the questions are anti-Trump. They voted for his impeachment. They only want a narrative so they ask their questions to get their answers. There is not an other side to challenge so their narrative is what gets pushed to the public. Stop with the garbage this is a fair hearing.
The other side can challenge all they want. Apparently the secret service is going to challenge. Or set the record straight or something.
I don’t see anyone else disputing the testimony they gave, or saying they were coerced, or misrepresented, or hostile.
If there is, go ahead and post it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
