Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-25-2022, 01:50 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,131,910 times
Reputation: 13096

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
Interesting how they go all the way up to the age of 19, to compile that data. 90% of the gangbanger shootings here in Detroit are aged 15-20. Seems a bit dishonest to add that age group in. I get it though, what ever it takes to gaslight, and shock the uninformed.
Actually they said at one time they included those up to 25 as children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2022, 01:51 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,131,910 times
Reputation: 13096
Quote:
Originally Posted by primaltech View Post
No? I'm not for getting rid of anything, including guns. I don't think it would even be realistically possible for such a large country to ever get rid of guns, and if we did, they'd be manufactured in secret or whatever.

I'm definitely for the regulation of the distribution of most or certain types of firearms. Gun control, if you will. I'm in favor of that. Denmark has had something like 3 mass shootings in 28 years. That's clearly a saner and more effective policy on guns than we have.

And guns are not banned there. They're just tightly regulated, and licenses are required for most of them. That's the way it should be. And that would not even be in conflict with the 2A.

Just like, how 90% of this stuff people claim these days about violations of their 1A rights, is not that. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater, and a private social media company can kick anyone off. This doesn't mean the 1A isn't still protecting the right to the freely expressed content of your speech. The government can't censor political dissidents like in China and Russia. That's what the 1A is and does.

The 2A says you can have an arm. That doesn't therefore mean that anyone can have any weapon at any time. Do you people want the craziest nut-job loonies out there to have anthrax and hydrogen bombs in their garage, and live next door to you? If not, then don't say you're not for regulation.
The 2A says "shall not be infringed".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 01:53 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,131,910 times
Reputation: 13096
Do you think the Democrats care that thousands would die if they tried to confiscate all firearms or even just all semi autos? Many people would refuse and fight back.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 01:57 PM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 14,003,732 times
Reputation: 18861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
Actually they said at one time they included those up to 25 as children.
Yes, that is one of the things that is rather disturbing of how much politicians lie to the people and yet, many people still accept the politicians as being right and out for our interests in saying we should not have guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 02:00 PM
 
29,503 posts, read 14,663,209 times
Reputation: 14458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
Actually they said at one time they included those up to 25 as children.
Okay, even more dishonest then. Just have to love the anti gun Democrats and their tactics. People fall for it though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 02:04 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,131,910 times
Reputation: 13096
Quote:
Originally Posted by scarabchuck View Post
Okay, even more dishonest then. Just have to love the anti gun Democrats and their tactics. People fall for it though.
Hey, they have to find some way to include gang bangers. The majority of child deaths are gang shootings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Richland, Washington
4,904 posts, read 6,017,135 times
Reputation: 3533
Peaceful divorce is the only solution. Liberals can gather in their blue sanctuaries and live under their insane democratic policies. Conservatives can come together in their own areas and live free of blue lunacy. Democratic sanctuaries will ban all guns yet still have the overwhelming majority of shootings and rampant violence. Red areas will have all the guns and be clean, safe, and civilized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 02:28 PM
 
17,587 posts, read 13,367,588 times
Reputation: 33035
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/amendment-2/


Second Amendment Right to Bear Arms

  • A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
    • Amdt2.2Historical Background of the Second Amendment
    • Amdt2.3Early Second Amendment Jurisprudence
    • Amdt2.4The Heller Decision and Individual Right to Firearms
    • Amdt2.5Post-Heller Issues and Application of Second Amendment to States
    • Amdt2.6The Bruen Decision and Concealed-Carry Licenses
Nuff said!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 02:30 PM
 
Location: Tyler, TX
23,861 posts, read 24,119,613 times
Reputation: 15135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone28 View Post
The number one cause of death in CHILDREN........firearms
That statistic is false. It includes anyone under 20 as a child. It's a manufactured 'fact' created by redefining what a 'child' is without telling anyone.

In other words, it's a direct lie.

Now take this information and correct the people you got it from. You might also want to give them a piece of your mind for lying to you in order to manipulate your opinion on an important political issue. At least, that's what I'd do, but then I won't accept being lied to, regardless of the reason. Will you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2022, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Seattle, WA
9,829 posts, read 7,267,247 times
Reputation: 7790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Floorist View Post
The 2A says "shall not be infringed".
It says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. If you tighten up regulation and licensing on AR-15's and that class of weapon, then that does not infringe on the right of the people to bear arms, as there are plenty of other types of arms available, other than that one. An arm means, a weapon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top