Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-01-2023, 11:02 AM
 
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
14,848 posts, read 8,215,763 times
Reputation: 4590

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hesychios View Post
Human society can exist only in a very narrow band of temperature.
When you say "human society", do you mean 1) The current infrastructure/geopolitics... 2) Civilization... 3) The current population(or more)... 4) The human species?

For #4, humans survived ice ages where temperatures were much cooler, and the Eemian warm period where the temperature was much warmer(and polar bears too). It would be extremely difficult to wipe out the human species(even a nuclear war wouldn't do it).

For #3, there is certainly an ideal temperature(and CO2 level) for maximum food production. Is it what we have now? Is it what we had during the Little Ice Age? Is it what we had during the medieval warm period? Is it what we had during the last glacial maximum? Is it a degree warmer? A degree colder? Five degrees warmer? Five degrees colder? And how much CO2?

#2 kind of goes with #4, it would be pretty hard to wipe out civilization short of human extinction.

#1 is the only one with any basis in reality, but almost entirely because of sea-level rise. The problem is that the Earth is already overdue for an ice age. The idea that if not for human-released GHG's the Earth would stay the same temperature is delusional.

Moreover, any time the Earth is "warming", the current decade will almost always be hotter than the previous decade. Thus every decade after the end of the Little Ice Age was warmer than the previous decade(IE was the "hottest decade/year on record"). Yet the warming through the 1940's is generally not attributed to human behavior.

With that said, none of this should be taken as an argument in favor of doing nothing. I just get irritated with all the lying. There are both pros and cons to a warmer Earth, but the "sides" in the climate-change debate are fundamentally political(and geopolitical), having little to do with climate-change itself.

As I always say, I'm less interested in what you believe than why you believe it. What do you really want?

Last edited by Redshadowz; 09-01-2023 at 11:29 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2023, 11:04 AM
 
7,272 posts, read 4,217,971 times
Reputation: 5466
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
So you have no scientific background, but you've spoken to some PhDs and formulated your own conclusions? Forgive me if I'm not impressed.

If you can't do research and formulate your own conclusions on things then you are at the mercy of others telling you what to think and believe. If that's you - they have you right where they want you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 11:07 AM
 
13,620 posts, read 4,940,342 times
Reputation: 9695
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
No, not disingenuous in the least. You simply lack accurate information, and draw your faulty conclusions on that. And its not all your fault, because certain facts have been deliberately kept from you. What is your fault is your insistence on remaining ignorant of the truth, by refusing to listen to information new to you.

Not widely advertised for obvious reasons is the scientific fact that the CO2 molecule itself is biochemically incapable of retaining the necessary heat to fit it’s claimed role within greenhouse gas theory model. ?
False. Any chemist can tell you (obviously you are not a chemist) that CO2 can absorb and re-emit infrared spectrum of light. It how glass works in a greenhouse. UV light penetrates the glass (and the atmosphere) but then is reflected back at a longer wavelength (IR). The IR doesn't bounce back into space if it is trapped by CO2.

What is your basis for saying this is not true?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 11:44 AM
 
Location: Vancouver
18,504 posts, read 15,571,038 times
Reputation: 11937
IMO this video is well done.

It's explains things clearly, but you must watch until the end.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpvd9FensT8
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Victoria, BC.
33,559 posts, read 37,160,046 times
Reputation: 14017
Quote:
Originally Posted by illtaketwoplease View Post
Good News. Over 1,600 Scientists & Professionals sign "No Climate Emergency" Declaration:

https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploa...ion-081423.pdf

The climate fear being pushed is manufactured to suit political and economic agendas to control you.
That is pure bovine excrement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,029 posts, read 14,219,965 times
Reputation: 16752
Anthropogenic Global Climate Change is a hoax. . . You know it's a hoax, because every weather anomaly is now blamed on AGCC. Climate does change and has changed, but it's not being driven by man, nor is the atmosphere "trapping heat." In fact, it keeps the Earth at least 116 F degrees cooler than the ISS & the lunar surface - both without "heat trapping" atmospheres.
(Albedo = 0.30)
CO2 and other trace gases have little effect, despite the Alarmist claims.
- - - - - - - -
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 02:12 PM
 
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
11,033 posts, read 5,995,283 times
Reputation: 5709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leo58 View Post
Well, duh! The perfect environment for plant growth would be a greenhouse - very hot and high levels of CO2. Not necessarily great for human life, however.
Yes. Greenhouses are deliberately and specifically built to raise the temperature conditions for plants to grow. Not only that but CO2 is pumped into them. Sometimes using oil burners that do both.

Ok, now about conditions for humans. Normal daytime temperatures in Cairo? 96F, max 102F

Let's try some place on the equator. Mean lowland temperatures 31C

Where I lived, max temperatures of 45C and that was 30 degrees south of the equator. And in a city. Plenty people living there and doing just fine.

What about water temperatures? That was raised by someone else but anyway. Water temperatures so high that I had to get out because it was burning me. Not blister burning but painful burning. Shallow water in the hot African sun. Green grass growing in it with small fish swimming aro8und just fine.

What about see water? Well, there are crustaceans living in the ocean near volcanic vents in which the water is over 212F 100C. It doesn't boil because it's deep. There is plant life there too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 03:09 PM
 
18,469 posts, read 8,292,857 times
Reputation: 13791
I was amazed at Kuwait City....the average high is 112 degrees...that's the average high year round...which means it can be cooler....and also a whole lot hotter

...and over 2 million people live there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 03:10 PM
 
Location: China Grove
184 posts, read 85,874 times
Reputation: 109
It wasn't all that long ago, that these same "scientists" were predicting a second ice age.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2023, 03:46 PM
 
24,421 posts, read 23,084,509 times
Reputation: 15029
In SE Pa we had the month of August go by with no 90 degree days. Now September will start off in the low 90s.
So where are these record high temps coming from? Why from the daily LOW temperatures recorded in urban areas. Asphalt acts as a heat well which traps heat and then radiates it after dark. If the temp stays up that way they say its a record heat wave. Fake science.
Apart from actual record heat in the southwest, the rest of the country actually was cooler than normal by half a degree this summer. My area it was 2.5 degrees cooler. Still a nice summer even if it never hit 100 degrees. We had several mid 90 degree days in July and a few in early June and even May.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top