Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-25-2009, 11:59 PM
 
Location: Earth Wanderer, longing for the stars.
12,406 posts, read 18,978,568 times
Reputation: 8912

Advertisements

There is another consideration here, in my opinion.
Some pets, including dogs, have had IQ testing - the sort that they give non verbal children.
The animals tested at about the level of a five year old kid.

So, leaving behind or attacking a pet is perceived by many of us as akin to doing the same to a loving 5 year old child.

I think we really should reform our laws regarding the treatment of animals, especially pets.

Periodically trucks are stopped moving from one state to the next and in the back are found lots of
pets, mostly dogs, being transported for voodoo or some similar religion sacrifices. THey like pets because they are more docile. Lab experimenters like pets, as well and animal adoption centers try to be very careful these days that the pets do not fall into the wrong hands.

I remember that there were voodoo (or something like that) worshipers in Florida who were using animals in this way. A law was passed making it illegal to kill animals in religious practices. Religious fundamentalists got the law yanked as a freedom of religion/separation of church and state issue.

 
Old 02-26-2009, 12:02 AM
 
18,131 posts, read 25,300,410 times
Reputation: 16845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Austin13 View Post
Your post is also sooooooo hazy as to be absurd. If you can't find specifics about such things as laws protecting animals over people in assaults and killings, then get to work and find that stuff rather than posting "hazy memories" of "something" that "may have happened".....you are posting about political issues now. Not pet issues.
It's a typical rightwinger comment, they learn it from Hannity
"Is California full of terrorist supporters?
I'm not saying they support them, I'm just asking"


They say it 2 more times, and if nobody can prove 100% that it's incorrect
then to them, it is a fact.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 12:11 AM
GLS
 
1,985 posts, read 5,381,310 times
Reputation: 2472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dopo View Post
It's a typical rightwinger comment, they learn it from Hannity
"Is California full of terrorist supporters?
I'm not saying they support them, I'm just asking"


They say it 2 more times, and if nobody can prove 100% that it's incorrect
then to them, it is a fact.
I suppose you believe Hannity would kill your pet if it were friends with a terrorist hawk from California with a broken right wing.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 12:14 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,140 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
In San Antonio a few years ago, a man shot a 16 year old thief taking off with one of his fighting roosters and got by with it, even though the thief was shot in the back. In Texas, you have a right to protect your property.

If someone was attacking my animals, unless it was provoked such as my dog biting for some reason, I would defend my animals. I would figure that someone trying to hurt an animal for no reason is a threat, crazed out-of-his-mind and/or looking for violence.
Hmmm, I see you've already got your defense planned.

No place quite like Texas it seems.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 12:23 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,140 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldengrain View Post
There is another consideration here, in my opinion.
Some pets, including dogs, have had IQ testing - the sort that they give non verbal children.
The animals tested at about the level of a five year old kid.

So, leaving behind or attacking a pet is perceived by many of us as akin to doing the same to a loving 5 year old child.

I think we really should reform our laws regarding the treatment of animals, especially pets.

Periodically trucks are stopped moving from one state to the next and in the back are found lots of
pets, mostly dogs, being transported for voodoo or some similar religion sacrifices. THey like pets because they are more docile. Lab experimenters like pets, as well and animal adoption centers try to be very careful these days that the pets do not fall into the wrong hands.

I remember that there were voodoo (or something like that) worshipers in Florida who were using animals in this way. A law was passed making it illegal to kill animals in religious practices. Religious fundamentalists got the law yanked as a freedom of religion/separation of church and state issue.
I agree with you. IMO, the laws should be much, much tougher regarding harming or mistreating animals.

I've never heard anything about trucks loaded with pets being transported to various places to be used in voodoo or religious practices. However, I am not in the least surprised that you would say there are exotic religious rituals in Florida (especially South Florida, Miami) which involve the killing of animals! Miami is a strange place indeed! I like Miami, however, I don't venture out into the more "exotic" areas of this city or South Florida! And I don't practice voodoo. I lean toward Buddhism. And do no harm.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 02:04 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,140 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by AT9 View Post
This has probably been answered completely by this point, but legally, NO.

You do not have a right to take someone's life because they threaten your property(even if it's a pet). In court, that would be like saying "I killed him because he threatened to slash the tires on my hummer." You have a right to protect your property, but the use of deadly force is not a right unless your life or someone else's life is in serious danger. Now, if you woke up in the middle of the night to a man dressed in black, armed, who's obviously broken into your house, and he's killing your dog, you probably have a right to shoot him. Why? Because an armed person who has broken into your house in the middle of the night is most likely a danger to your life. BUT, if someone ran away with your pet, and you shot them in the back, you'd be in trouble.

The basic principal here is: destruction or theft of property does not justify the taking of life.

With that said, if someone started messing with my dogs, I'd be hard pressed not to beat them sensless.
Except in the state of Texas.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 02:08 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,140 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldengrain View Post
My dog would have no hesitation in giving his life in trying to defend mine.
I would be less than human if I could not honor that bond and do the same for him, the law be damned.
Pets show more loyalty and love than people at times.
They often care for us more than we deserve.
Well, who would take care of your dog while you were in prison or on death row?

I agree with you that often pets do show much more loyalty and love than people.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 04:38 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
5,238 posts, read 8,796,574 times
Reputation: 2647
Default Could you kill a person who threatened your pet?

Yes, depending on the circumstances of course. And it could be legal.

If someone broke onto my property and was threatening me or my property (my pet in this case), in Texas I would have every legal right to shoot the person. I am not sure about other states. I know this because a member of the Sheriff's office advised me to do just that after we had been broken into. His only caveat was to make sure the intruder died on the property. And if he didn't, to drag his body back onto the property before we called the police.

Police can legally kill someone who shoots a police dog - it's considered part of the police force, not just property. And depending on where you live, you can kill someone who is taking your property on your property. Break into my house and my dog will go after you. You are already a threat to both of us, but even if you are only going after my dog, I will kill you.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 04:42 AM
 
Location: Connecticut
1,462 posts, read 4,869,130 times
Reputation: 1668
Default Could you Kill a Person who Threatened to hurt your pet?

Strange Post to say the least. Killing is wrong no matter what the reason unless that is you are being threatened yourself or someone is threatening the life of your child. Self-Defense is a totally different deal. To kill for a pet....no, that is not justifiable in any state and why pick on California or Massachusetts?

Should someone ever try to harm my pet, of course I would try to stop them somehow but to kill them NO, NO and NO.
 
Old 02-26-2009, 04:50 AM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,772,368 times
Reputation: 3587
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeeee22895 View Post
I just read a post by somebody who says he could.

I love my cat dearly. I have spent money on her. I would probably spend a lot of money on her if I had to. I understand how people love their pets dearly. I understand how people humanize their pets.

But she is an animal.

A person is a human being.

No animal is worth the life of a human being.

I wonder if there is case law on this. The only place I could imagine something like this being allowed is California or Massachusetts.
I have a dog and I think he is worth more than lots of humans I know of.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top