Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-11-2009, 12:49 PM
 
817 posts, read 853,486 times
Reputation: 203

Advertisements

All the non Christian whiners don't seem to mind taking the day off for something they don't believe in. Talk about hypocrites.

No matter what you say Jesus still loves you and will wait for you.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-11-2009, 12:58 PM
 
Location: Up in the air
19,112 posts, read 30,635,477 times
Reputation: 16395
Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedman View Post
All the non Christian whiners don't seem to mind taking the day off for something they don't believe in. Talk about hypocrites.

No matter what you say Jesus still loves you and will wait for you.
I've worked on Christmas many times... my current company gives Christmas eve and Christmas day off per company policy so I couldn't work even if I asked.

Oh, and if you would have read the first couple of pages of this thread, you'd realize that you christians stole this holiday from the pagans, so technically you're still celebrating the solstice. Have fun during your solstice celebrations!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 01:01 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,482,490 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
The point being--would you protest it? It's just a symbol, it doesn't have any meaning, but that which you give it.
The point is that governments have only powers...no rights. Under what power would a goverment be able to justify its erection of a swastika on public property?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
By the way, the swastika predates the Nazis by hundreds, if not thousands, of years.
A long time either way, and I know. Its connotation may have changed over the years, of course, but it is still not recognized as a religious symbol and so would not be likely to fit within the purview of either the Establishment or Free Exercise clauses..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 01:32 PM
 
Location: Bradenton, Florida
27,232 posts, read 46,668,826 times
Reputation: 11084
Quote:
Originally Posted by saganista View Post
The point is that governments have only powers...no rights. Under what power would a goverment be able to justify its erection of a swastika on public property?

Fiat. It is a government after all. It doesn't have to justify its use of power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 03:09 PM
 
13,053 posts, read 12,955,596 times
Reputation: 2618
Quote:
Originally Posted by ray1945 View Post
The courts disagree with you: Regarding the CA case that is currently being heard by the SCOTUS:

I disagree with you re Christianity being oppressed. Until recent years, Christianity had been allowed to become the de facto religion of the US. IMO, Christianity is now simply taking its rightful place in the pantheon of religions that exist within the borders of the US. It is no more and no less important a religion than the many others that may be practiced by the citizens of this country.
The courts stopped interpreting the Constitution a long time ago and now opt for instituting their own "of the age" interpretation. The courts have sided the opposite in our past, it is merely now fashionable to hate Christianity and so they rule accordingly.

The country never "allowed to become the de facto religion", it was simply that the majority of its people were and still are Christian and so it was natural to see various cultural influences. There is no religious doctrine pressed on the people, there are no laws for violating any Christian doctrine, there is no breech of individual rights with these occurrences.

Now there are numerous breeches by people who have restricted, condemned, and vilified Christianity and they have violated the Constitution numerous times by their actions to oppress the free exercise of. They have manipulated the words to fit their agenda. They are not simply people looking to insure each individual is protected, they are pushing a side and using the government as their thug.

As I mentioned earlier, in NY they condemned the manger scene and forced the Christians to use the Christmas tree, a non-Christian icon. All the while, the Jewish and other religions were allowed to display their specific religous icons.

This happens all the time, there is a double standard and an express hatred for Christianity and there are numerous people who specifically target it for condemnation.

The courts are wrong, but not by my claim, rather the founders statements, numerous statements by those close to them, the Constitution and the historical context to which this nation began.

It doesn't matter though, the truth is irrelevant, it only matters how many people you can get to accept a lie. Such is the nature of politics and the mob. Nothing new here, this has been going on long before the US.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 03:12 PM
 
26,218 posts, read 49,060,172 times
Reputation: 31791
Quote:
Originally Posted by maskedman View Post
All the non Christian whiners don't seem to mind taking the day off for something they don't believe in. Talk about hypocrites....
Childish bull. Places of employment are closed on that day, period.
__________________
- Please follow our TOS.
- Any Questions about City-Data? See the FAQ list.
- Want some detailed instructions on using the site? See The Guide for plain english explanation.
- Realtors are welcome here but do see our Realtor Advice to avoid infractions.
- Thank you and enjoy City-Data.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 03:15 PM
 
4,474 posts, read 5,415,101 times
Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Keegan View Post
Please post for us the language from the Constitution that prohibits religious symbols on public property.
Already have, but I will again...

From Bouvier's Law Dictionary, the first comprehensive US law dictionary first published in 1836, and still considered the authority on early American legal definitions.

4. To found, recognize, confirm or admit; as, congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition - Letter E
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 03:18 PM
 
4,474 posts, read 5,415,101 times
Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Keegan View Post
What?
Can you explain what this is supposed to mean?
It is quite clear.

Religious worship, within US secular laws, is perfectly preserved within the private sector.

That is to say on privately owned lands using private funds, as opposed to public, or government owned, lands using public funds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 03:23 PM
 
4,474 posts, read 5,415,101 times
Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Generally speaking, Christmas is a Holiday celebrated by religious and non-religious people alike. Christmas is not a holiday of only one religion. Christmas IS a holiday that is celebrated in MANY different countries - worldwide.

It seems that those who oppose Christmas displays, or using the word CHRISTMAS (make it "winter soltace" play) are afraid of anything that is connected to religion or a God of any type.

If people want to put up displays celebrating the holiday known as Christmas - let them. It is hurting NO ONE.
You'll be hard pressed to find people who are opposed to secular Christmas displays on public property.

It is religious displays, on government property, that are the issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-11-2009, 05:12 PM
 
19,198 posts, read 31,482,490 times
Reputation: 4013
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKramar View Post
Fiat. It is a government after all. It doesn't have to justify its use of power.
There is no such things as a general fiat power. The federal government is granted only those limited powers that are specified in the Constitution and no others. Every act of Congress must rest for its authority on one or more of those particular powers that the Congress believes entitles it to enact the legislation that follows. Those with objection to the legislation often base their challenges on the notion that the powers cited do not in fact entitle the Congress to act in the way it has.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top