Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-25-2016, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Research Triangle, NC
1,279 posts, read 1,723,733 times
Reputation: 833

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard-xyzzy View Post
In 1932 when US 264 was created, its western end was at Zebulon. The extension to Raleigh came in 1997, for political reasons I assume.

By the way, between 1941 and 1952, the highway between Durham and Wake Forest was NC 264. It was renumbered NC 98 in 1952. In the war years NC 264 continued from Wake Forest to Zebulon over what's now NC 96. Clearly there was intent at that time to bring US 264 into Durham, but for whatever reason it never happened.
I love information like this!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-25-2016, 04:36 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by wizard-xyzzy View Post
In 1932 when US 264 was created, its western end was at Zebulon. The extension to Raleigh came in 1997, for political reasons I assume.
Probably. My guess is that Greenville and/or Wilson wanted a single designation going all the way to Raleigh. However, now that it's all but certain that US-264 will become an interstate between Zebulon and Greenville, I doubt Greenville cares anymore whether or not the US-264 designation continues to go all the way to Raleigh. If AASHTO approves NCDOT's request in November, now would be a good time to truncate it back to Zebulon.

I agree with papilgee4evaeva. Appreciate the info!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2016, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
NCDOT has submitted a request for "Future I-587", following US-264 from US-64/Future I-87 in Zebulon to the US-264/Stantonsburg Road interchange (Exit 73) in Greenville. AASHTO denied the request.

The request and reasons for rejection can be found on pages 47 & 48.

http://highways.transportation.org/D...s%20AM2016.pdf

Quote:
One application was not approved from North Carolina to establish a future Interstate Route 587. The reasons are as follows:

Region 1 Member: The interstate system is intended to connect states and this is not a loop, alternate route, or bypass

Region 2 Member: This does not appear to be a bypass, nor a spur. It does not appear to have the potential to extend across state lines. It is already using Interstate and US Highways so I don't quite understand the need, unless this is legislated by Congress (which we didn't receive) by the rules of the Committee it must be denied.

Region 3 Member: This does not meet the definition for interstate designation. It does not connect to another state and also is not an alternate route, bypass, or business route.

Region 4 Member: Interstate system is intended to connect states, however, this is not a loop, alternate route or bypass.
Unless the Eastern NC Gateway Act passes Congress, US-264 will never become an interstate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2016, 07:53 PM
 
Location: Research Triangle, NC
1,279 posts, read 1,723,733 times
Reputation: 833
Sure looks like a spur to me...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-26-2016, 09:32 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by papilgee4evaeva View Post
Sure looks like a spur to me...
Same here. Those so-called "reasons" are total BS. Did they even look at a map?

FHWA could overrule AASHTO and approve Future I-587. NCDOT had the same exact trouble with I-795 back in 2007. AASHTO denied I-795 during the spring 2007 meeting for the same reasons. FHWA went ahead and approved it on the condition that NCDOT fixed an accident-prone section of US-264 in Wilson. NCDOT agreed and gave AASHTO FHWA's letter at their fall 2007 meeting. AASHTO approved I-795 then.

FHWA backed I-795 due to Goldsboro having a military base. While Greenville doesn't have a military base, it's population and regional significance should be enough to convince FHWA to approve Future I-587.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-28-2016, 01:34 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
Greenville's mayor Allen Thomas says that the Future I-587 designation for US-264 between Zebulon and Greenville may still get approved after all.

Request to make US 264 an interstate still under consideration
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 04:45 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
The state is seeking federal approval of a Memorandum of Understanding that would designate US-264 as a future interstate (Future I-587) between Zebulon and Greenville.

NC lawmakers want federal interstate designation for Highway 264 | News & Observer

Today is AASHTO's final day of their fall meeting, but based on this article, it appears that AASHTO's Standing Committee on Highways did not overturn the US Route Numbering Committee's initial rejection of Future I-587.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
Today is AASHTO's final day of their fall meeting, but based on this article, it appears that AASHTO's Standing Committee on Highways did not overturn the US Route Numbering Committee's initial rejection of Future I-587.
Looks like I was wrong. AASHTO has officially approved designating US-264 between Zebulon and Greenville as Future I-587!

https://governor.nc.gov/press-releas...gnation-us-264
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 06:08 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
It's official. FHWA has approved Future I-587 for US-264 between Zebulon and Greenville (Exit 73). Future I-587 signs will undoubtedly be popping up within the next few months.

Final approval given in effort to designate U.S. 264 as future interstate

Quote:
Governor Pat McCrory has announced that the Federal Highway Administration has today approved the state’s application to add U.S. 264 between Zebulon and Greenville to the Interstate Highway System as Future Interstate 587. This marks the final step in the approval process for the designation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-21-2016, 06:28 PM
 
4,264 posts, read 4,718,236 times
Reputation: 4084
So this means FI-587 and I-795 will be multiplexed for 5 miles, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top