[i know this is shallow to some] but girls w small breast dont turn me on (average, meaning)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So what if you marry the woman of your dreams and God forbid she develop something wrong with them like breast cancer and she would have to get them removed or they hurt her back really bad that she would have to get a breast reduction. Would you leave her and find someone else with bigger ones?
Get yourself a man for that, I'm sure there a plenty of guys who will be willing to do that. Just show off your boobs. Oh wait, are they a D? Otherwise, according to this thread, you are out of luck.
Hi Max's Maxs,
I would say, given your appearance and disposition, you would be afforded a considerable variability in size. In another time and place, I may have required from you at the very least a polite refusal of my attention. I think it is also an attractive quality that any woman would not behold the notion of both of us creating an offspring otherwise know as a virulent spawn. That is the attraction behind the breast over a milky pair of fangs.
Though that would need to be some pair of breasts to have me dig for diamonds in Africa. Not only is the rarity artificially maintained by one of the most odious cartels ever to be they are as useless as teats on a bull. Even from the beginning, those that tried ran into Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner who saw to it that many suckled their last. Though I suppose a diamond neckless and good cleavage gives a little something for everyone. I can always pretend to be interested in the diamonds.
So what if you marry the woman of your dreams and God forbid she develop something wrong with them like breast cancer and she would have to get them removed or they hurt her back really bad that she would have to get a breast reduction. Would you leave her and find someone else with bigger ones?
Hi LOVELESSCHILD,
Perhaps a woman who likes intelligence in a man should simply seek out men who already have had a disabling brain trauma to put her moral superiority on display. How about a man with accident forevermore impotent? Why take a chance on a disaster never happening? Why take a chance on hiding such nobility?
Has not the proposition of marriage always been to select the best you can find and then after which stick with them for better or worse?
I suggest woman stop trying to take a position of moral superiority on this issue. You generally don't have it.
Though on a case by case basis, I will be allow myself to be silenced by the beautiful women who select short, poor men of limited intelligence. Such a woman who sees past such a who man lacks 6 inches of stature , and his slow witted and ineffectual attempts that are yet well meaning, benign and loving may speak now.
Unless they are some nice breasts that went together with a nice tight p***. LOL.
I always felt a little more like I worked in the petroleum industry with my Schlumberger drilling rig. It took me a long time to know enough about geological layers to avoid the deposits of sludgy, sour crude. I am glad I choose to firmly secure the elusive mineral rights for a plot in Russia with its excellent mountain views and vistas.
I always felt a little more like I worked in the petroleum industry with my Schlumberger drilling rig. It took me a long time to know enough about geological layers to avoid the deposits of sludgy, sour crude. I am glad I choose to firmly secure the elusive mineral rights for a plot in Russia with its excellent mountain views and vistas.
I would say, given your appearance and disposition, you would be afforded a considerable variability in size. In another time and place, I may have required from you at the very least a polite refusal of my attention. I think it is also an attractive quality that any woman would not behold the notion of both of us creating an offspring otherwise know as a virulent spawn. That is the attraction behind the breast over a milky pair of fangs.
Though that would need to be some pair of breasts to have me dig for diamonds in Africa. Not only is the rarity artificially maintained by one of the most odious cartels ever to be they are as useless as teats on a bull. Even from the beginning, those that tried ran into Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner who saw to it that many suckled their last. Though I suppose a diamond neckless and good cleavage gives a little something for everyone. I can always pretend to be interested in the diamonds.
Thanks for your pretended interest! However...
No thanks...you're not my type.
I am what is known as a rock-hound...even if said rocks value is artificially maintained.
And how is it being fed?? Hmm?? Eating liquids made from your body, obtaining those liquids from a part of your body,therefore eating you. Even if they dont get it directly from the boob, mother's still pump themselves for milk (reminds me of a cow at a dairy). Thinking of it is just gross to me...gives me the heebie jeebies.
For what its worth, Capt. Dan...the only "children" I'll ever care for will have 4 legs and a tail.
So its "natural" for 4 legged critters to suckle mom but "unnatural" for humans to do so?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.