Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-13-2011, 11:00 PM
 
1,220 posts, read 987,428 times
Reputation: 122

Advertisements

Shalom...
flip a coin...say, best two out of three. One side represents the Big Bang; the other represents naturalistic processes. Of course the odds of this coin landing on it's proverbial edge even once out of three possible tries are astronomical,but not impossible. What view do you suppose the edge of this "coin" possibly represents?
"Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear."
Hebrews 11:3 King James Bible (Cambridge Edition)

It is apparent that everyone wants to know "how" G-d's Word framed it all together...nevertheless: "Wait on the LORD: be of good courage, and he shall strengthen thine heart: wait, I say, on the LORD."
Psalm 27:14 King James Bible (Cambridge Edition)
Peas and hominy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-14-2011, 02:01 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,202,662 times
Reputation: 27914
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
I read as jaw drops to the floor, this coming from one of the more conservative Christians on the board.



To make this argument, you would have to assume that everything that is was intended to turn out this way from the beginning and some how everything worked out. Not so. Suppose we were to hit the proverbial "reset button" on the universe if such a button existed. There is no gaurantee that we would get the same result. You attribute too much awe to the result that we did get.

Picture throwing a deck of cards into the air and then admiring the pattern that forms on the floor as the cards fall.{ How in the world did everything fall right into place in order to form this pattern? } If you were to pick these cards up and throw them again, exactly the same way even, there would likely be a different pattern. Would you then admire that pattern as well, and ask how everything fell into place as it did?

If we were to hit the reset button there would be no assurance of our existence. FYI, nothing is truly random. Even the direction in which a raindrop slides down a window isn't random. Take into account the density of the drop, wind, imperfections in the glass, etc. etc. All of which would be determining factors for the direction that the drop slid.[/quote]

Thanks. You saved me a lot of typing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 02:42 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,561,880 times
Reputation: 6790
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
In my opinion the odds of a naturally occurring universe are immensely better than some imaginary deity creating it all.
Which is your right.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Humans exist on one tiny planet out of a possible trillions of planets, but some have an ego that is larger than the entire universe...Humans are not any more special than any other creature....
I don't think we have to get into humans at all for this, particularly as it seems to gum up the works in some of these discussions.

The constants concerning the nuclear forces, their relation to electromagnetism, the level of mass in the Universe, and some others I'm not sure how to describe well allow for their to be planets or life. Even slight alterations on these would likely make the Universe collapse to fast for life to evolve or things not connect well enough to form atoms or stars fuse too fast or too slow.

And if we need to get to biology, which I'm not sure we do, life here existed as single-cell organism for a very long time. I think maybe the majority of life's history. The ability to turn into multicellular life might require some odd situations.

Sure maybe sentient and sapient beings could exist based on nexuses of energy or something, but it's more than a little speculative. It doesn't have to be about humans here. It can be about the existence of anything more self-aware than a horse or chicken or maybe even just the existence of life more complex than a bacteria.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
1 The universe is expanding.

2 The second line of evidence is the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

3 The theory predicts that certain amounts of hydrogen, helium, and other elements should be seen. Observations have shown almost exactly the amounts that are predicted.

4 The Big Bang theory is the only one that comprehensively lays down a framework for the eventual evolution of the universe as we observe it today.
One of the earliest proponents of the Big Bang was a Catholic priest. He didn't like taking religious meaning from it, but Pope Pius XII kind of did by the time my Mom was about 8 or 9.

But yes the Universe had a Creation-Event. I've seen atheists who don't like that, so it's good you accept mainstream science.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
Picture throwing a deck of cards into the air and then admiring the pattern that forms on the floor as the cards fall.{ How in the world did everything fall right into place in order to form this pattern? } If you were to pick these cards up and throw them again, exactly the same way even, there would likely be a different pattern. Would you then admire that pattern as well, and ask how everything fell into place as it did?
This isn't quite the "skeptics deck of cards analogy" that usually makes me groan, but it's close.

If we threw this "deck of cards", the constants of the Universe, again there almost certainly wouldn't be anyone there to admire anything.

The situation we find ourselves in is closer to throwing a deck of cards in the air and having a royal flush drop into our palm. Sure that's not impossible, but it is pretty weird.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 05:09 AM
 
Location: Florida
23,173 posts, read 26,202,662 times
Reputation: 27914
It's only a royal flush because we only know what we have ended up as(so far) .
May be what we are is only a pair and the royal flush might have been something much much greater.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 05:56 AM
 
5,458 posts, read 6,716,826 times
Reputation: 1814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
If we threw this "deck of cards", the constants of the Universe, again there almost certainly wouldn't be anyone there to admire anything.
Are you really claiming that you understand the possible range and distributions of the various fundamental physical constants of nature well enough to tell us that universes like our own are extremely rare? Please point us to your peer-reviewed publication of these results, since you're way ahead of the rest of science.

Quote:
The situation we find ourselves in is closer to throwing a deck of cards in the air and having a royal flush drop into our palm. Sure that's not impossible, but it is pretty weird.
Which makes it just as likely and weird as any other outcome ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 05:58 AM
 
5,458 posts, read 6,716,826 times
Reputation: 1814
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr5150 View Post
"Don't know" is all well and good. But hardly the stuff of proof.
Yes, which is why there's a large gap between "we don't know how the universe came about" and "therefore god exists". It's strange believers try to connect the two. You'd figure if god were so important in the big scheme of things they could point to something we actually knew as evidence rather than something vague and poorly understood.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 06:38 AM
 
Location: Toronto, ON
2,332 posts, read 2,840,083 times
Reputation: 259
I always thought Pascal's wager was an idea related to the experiencing of the World. If we are to regard the whole world in the temporal state of irregularity. We proceed to know not by mathematics but, by at least, what he determines as Physics. The other physics of regular observations is itself realized with Fate and Chance. Physics is taken up by Platonic knowledge for the mechanics in our own bodies, Take it that God is for the ultimate Need to be realizing in the midst of the environment.

But is the environment really ultimately irregular? That is no proof.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 06:51 AM
 
2,854 posts, read 2,053,449 times
Reputation: 348
It seems much more likely to me that existence began with a singularity
which exploded into a state of total khaos in which even space itself did not exist
and our universe somehow emerged from that khaos.

Last edited by granpa; 11-14-2011 at 07:31 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 07:27 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,561,880 times
Reputation: 6790
Quote:
Originally Posted by KCfromNC View Post
Are you really claiming that you understand the possible range and distributions of the various fundamental physical constants of nature well enough to tell us that universes like our own are extremely rare? Please point us to your peer-reviewed publication of these results, since you're way ahead of the rest of science.
I trust the people who know this stuff, I think have a rough understanding of what they say, and most of the people I mean are atheists.

The explanations I know of are

There's a multiverse, we're in the rare Universe that works for life but if we weren't we wouldn't know it and some Universe is going to have our combination or near enough of one.

The constants are as they are because of mathematical inevitabilities in the higher dimensional brane-space.


Improbably fortunate events prove nothing. Some people are born into billions, this isn't proof of a grand plan to make little Johnny a billionaire.


The Universe is created by a mind, but not a God. It's just some being in a lab in some other Universe and we might create Universes ourselves someday so no big thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by KCfromNC View Post
Which makes it just as likely and weird as any other outcome ...
I suppose in a technical sense, but this really elides a great deal.

Sure any single result might be equally likely. Four particular cards falling in your hand, of any suit or number, is just as likely as four aces (I switched as this might be easier to discuss) falling in your hand when you throw a deck in the air. However we're not really comparing four aces to any other specific combination. We're comparing four aces to anything or to cards landing in your hand at all.

A variety of outcomes could produce a universe that collapses or can't produce atoms or whatever. A much more limited number of outcomes allow for a universe that could produce life. Yes this Universe is just as likely as any one specific inert Universe, but this is sort of missing the point.

It's fine if you find the "I don't need an answer" answer okay, but I don't. I could see a non-theistic answer as worth considering, but the "everything that happens is improbable, maybe weird energy creatures live in those other Universes" answers generally strike me as dodgy at best.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-14-2011, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Sitting beside Walden Pond
4,612 posts, read 4,895,991 times
Reputation: 1408
Quote:
Originally Posted by sanspeur View Post
Like it or not, the word proof is not used in science
You are exactly right.

We did a lot of proofs when I studied math, but we had the luxury of specifying exactly what our assumptions (or postulates) were to begin with.

If these assumptions (like those of Euclid) did not correspond to reality, that was fine with us. We were only interested in going from an assumption to a conclusion in logically correct steps.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top