Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-22-2023, 11:47 AM
 
4,640 posts, read 1,793,098 times
Reputation: 6428

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by ElijahAstin View Post
You continue to talk past me and make strawman arguments. I never said (nor would I ever suggest) that people should push themselves to have premarital sex, or any sort of sex, if it flies in the face of their inhibitions (whatever those may be).

While I find the discussion interesting, the implicit premise of this thread (trying to convince someone to have premarital sex) rubs me the wrong way accordingly. The solution is not to disrespect your partner’s boundaries but find a partner who has matching boundaries in that (not unimportant) regard.
Oh, please STOP with the whole "strawman arguments" stuff. I simply responded to a post. Take it or leave it.

The point of this thread is to discover reasons WHY someone may want to wait until marriage to have sex, without saying something like, "Because God said so!"

All I've tried to do is to present some practical reasons to wait, that have NOTHING to do with God. So to speak...

Sorry, but the possibility of contracting an STD IS a valid reason to postpone sex...

...especially having sex with someone who doesn't think that getting an STD is "that big of a deal"...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-22-2023, 12:02 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,823 posts, read 24,335,838 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElijahAstin View Post
You continue to talk past me and make strawman arguments. I never said (nor would I ever suggest) that people should push themselves to have premarital sex, or any sort of sex, if it flies in the face of their inhibitions (whatever those may be).

While I find the discussion interesting, the implicit premise of this thread (trying to convince someone to have premarital sex) rubs me the wrong way accordingly. The solution is not to disrespect your partner’s boundaries but find a partner who has matching boundaries in that (not unimportant) regard.
well stated
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 12:03 PM
 
Location: Sun City West, Arizona
50,823 posts, read 24,335,838 times
Reputation: 32953
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mink57 View Post
Oh, please STOP with the whole "strawman arguments" stuff. I simply responded to a post. Take it or leave it.

The point of this thread is to discover reasons WHY someone may want to wait until marriage to have sex, without saying something like, "Because God said so!"

All I've tried to do is to present some practical reasons to wait, that have NOTHING to do with God. So to speak...

Sorry, but the possibility of contracting an STD IS a valid reason to postpone sex...

...especially having sex with someone who doesn't think that getting an STD is "that big of a deal"...
Oh, please STOP so frequently saying "Oh, please STOP".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 12:37 PM
 
4,640 posts, read 1,793,098 times
Reputation: 6428
Quote:
Originally Posted by phetaroi View Post
Oh, please STOP so frequently saying "Oh, please STOP".
...
...which contributes NOTHING to the thread... Once again...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 12:43 PM
 
Location: minnesota
15,862 posts, read 6,328,434 times
Reputation: 5059
If one thinks rushing into sex is bad imagine rushing into marriage so you can have sex. There is a strict purity rule in the group I grew up in. On the ex-JW subreddit I go to many people find themselves in marriages they entered into at 18 and now at 25 they no longer are believers. Now they have someone who they have grown apart from. Bad for both of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 08:10 PM
 
Location: Northeastern US
20,005 posts, read 13,486,477 times
Reputation: 9938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mink57 View Post
Sorry, but the possibility of contracting an STD IS a valid reason to postpone sex...
Well marriage isn't a magic preventative and that's a civil ceremony anyway, even if, at the pleasure of the state, a religious person officiates. The state still grants the marriage license.

The only way to absolutely eliminate that risk is to have a clean bill of health via lab tests before embarking on a new (and exclusive) intimate relationship -- whether married or not. Or of course to both (claim to) be virgins I suppose.

I will say that the possibility of nasty diseases was a factor in my chastity as a teen, and I will admit there's some confidence bestowed by marrying a like-minded person with no sexual history. Whether that's worth it or not, IDK. It was all I knew at the time, so I "saved myself for marriage". In retrospect, and purely in my view, I would have benefitted from being a little more worldy and savvy than that. I would have chosen differently, when it came to wife #1, I can tell you that. I had no clue what I was doing, in terms of mate selection or anything else. It didn't help that the relevant topics were basically non-discussable. "Just marry a good Christian girl and everything will work out", they said. As IF.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 08:27 PM
 
15,968 posts, read 7,032,343 times
Reputation: 8550
Quote:
Originally Posted by L8Gr8Apost8 View Post
If one thinks rushing into sex is bad imagine rushing into marriage so you can have sex. There is a strict purity rule in the group I grew up in. On the ex-JW subreddit I go to many people find themselves in marriages they entered into at 18 and now at 25 they no longer are believers. Now they have someone who they have grown apart from. Bad for both of them.
Growing apart can happen no matter what the reason was for the marriage. People don’t stay together and try and make the marriage work because the sex is great. They do it for love, family, children, finances. Rarely for the great sex. But these things may all be personal, who knows. Maybe if the sex is great you can still have sex with someone you have come to loathe. Hard to imagine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2023, 09:50 PM
 
4,640 posts, read 1,793,098 times
Reputation: 6428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mordant View Post
Well marriage isn't a magic preventative and that's a civil ceremony anyway, even if, at the pleasure of the state, a religious person officiates. The state still grants the marriage license.
You're right, it's not. But then again, we're not talking about marriage. We're talking about what happens BEFORE marriage...

Right?

Quote:
The only way to absolutely eliminate that risk is to have a clean bill of health via lab tests before embarking on a new (and exclusive) intimate relationship -- whether married or not. Or of course to both (claim to) be virgins I suppose.
Nope. The only "absolute way to eliminate risk and to have a clean bill of health" is complete abstinence. No need for lab tests.

Quote:
SI will say that the possibility of nasty diseases was a factor in my chastity as a teen, and I will admit there's some confidence bestowed by marrying a like-minded person with no sexual history. Whether that's worth it or not, IDK. It was all I knew at the time, so I "saved myself for marriage". In retrospect, and purely in my view, I would have benefitted from being a little more worldy and savvy than that. I would have chosen differently, when it came to wife #1, I can tell you that. I had no clue what I was doing, in terms of mate selection or anything else. It didn't help that the relevant topics were basically non-discussable. "Just marry a good Christian girl and everything will work out", they said. As IF.
So.......did everything work out?

Last edited by mensaguy; 02-23-2023 at 05:04 AM.. Reason: Fixed quote
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-23-2023, 11:00 AM
 
Location: Ruston, Louisiana
2,108 posts, read 1,047,911 times
Reputation: 4793
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
Why do you feel that it's important to know this information?

Also; if it is important to one or more partners in the prospective marriage, one would presume that they would have talked about it before marriage.

"Sexual compatibility" is a joke. If one party has a male sex organ and the other party has a female sex organ, then they are compatible.

Just practically speaking, marriage is about dying to self for the sake of the spouse. The partner with the high sex drive should be always willing to refrain from sex for the sake of the other, and the partner with the low sex drive should be always willing to engage in sex for the sake of the other.
With all due respect, I agree to disagree very much on your statement that compatibility is a joke and that if one party has male organ and another has female you are compatibie. That is ridiculous to say the least. Sexual compatibility involves WAY more than two sex organs. Wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-24-2023, 06:12 AM
 
Location: Michigan, Maryland-born
1,754 posts, read 755,800 times
Reputation: 1782
Quote:
Originally Posted by EscAlaMike View Post
Everybody wants things they'll never get. Those things people want may be unreasonable, impossible, or simply immoral.

Marriage is not about getting what we want, but rather is about sacrificing what we want for the good of the spouse. If we understood this, we would not make unreasonable or immoral demands of our spouse; and we would be content in knowing that through these personal sacrifices we are winning salvation for ourself and our spouse.
You are a wonderful person who listens to your wife and makes sure she is content. That is great on you. I am not sure every relationship is quite the same though.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Cruithne View Post
Right but like I said, no amount of communication is going to sort out physical incompatibility... see below.
Besides which, a lot men aren't the chat-about-our-issues type.. they'd rather pretend there's no problem or get all offended and take it all as criticism.
Then what?



All of the above yes plus let's just say it's not a one size fits all situation. There are situations that can lead to a) a great deal of discomfort or b) a great deal.of disappointment.
I'm sure I don't need to spell it out.
I get it....my husband is the avoid conversations that can have emotion type....also I am short and thin and my husband is tall and wide...its not always 100% fun.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top