Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by arjay57 View Post
It's up to Cobb but personally I would rather see Cumberland connect to Perimeter and hook into the north-south line there.
I think we need both to be honest. Anything along the top end will need Cobb, Gwinnett, and Fulton's support, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-05-2015, 12:29 PM
 
559 posts, read 832,680 times
Reputation: 517
Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
As I've said before, I just don't see MARTA in Cobb County for at least another decade or two. Gwinnett would come online first, but apparently they have some anti-transit leaders of their own.

Now since Cumberland borders the CoA, then with the right moves, perhaps MARTA could expand to there only. At the very least, that would give a "commuter HRT" route from Cobb into Midtown/Downtown, plus potential access to SunTrust Park.
In a hypothetical local straw vote of Smyrna/Vinings residents, rail to Cumberland would get overwhelming approval.

That same vote in Kennesaw/East Cobb on rail to KSU would get overwhelming rejection.

As much as the annoying CD poster likes to crow about Cobb being anti-Atlanta, Kennesaw and East Cobb are pretty much anti-Cumberland .... and have very different views on transit.

All that said, there is a measurable ground swell of support for MARTA to the Braves stadium among Cumberland area residents, businesses, and most certainly the Cobb Chamber.

OTOH, Rich Golick, Hunter Hill, and Bob Ott are strongly opposed and they matter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 04:38 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,105,497 times
Reputation: 4670
What kill me about this is debate and I been saying this before the 2012 that Business Community itself not just the " liberals / progressives" is for transit.

The 20 county metro area alone is project to be over 8 million by 2040. Leaders are not just looking at fixing current issues but preventing future ones. "CID" Community Improvement Districts...........Are Districts organize by business leaders, who taxes themselves to improve their communities. The studies and trasits plan were funded by largely CID's. If you noticed The transit plans are planned to connecting the CID. There are more CID but these CID's have plan of urbanizing.


Cumberland Community Improvement District,
Town Center Area Community Improvement District

Gwinnett Place Community Improvement District,
Gwinnett Village Community Improvement District


North Fulton Community Improvement District
Perimeter Community Improvement District
Buckhead Community Improvement District
Midtown alliance (Midtown Community Improvement District)
central atlanta progress (Downtown Community Improvement District)

Airport East CID/Airport West CID (hartsfield jackson's Community Improvement District)

Atlanta obliviously can't and isn't going to take all of the metro growth. But just cause all the growth in the metro area won't to be completely in Atlanta core doesn't mean all growth will be sprawl. So the ARC is looking areas town centers like Decatur, Corridors like Cliffton, Buford Hwy, Cobb Parkway, Build more urban edge cities and urbanize the current Cumberland and Perimeter more. And Connect these centers. The locations where transit is plan is not random it's comprehensive with a bunch of other plans in these counties.


Yall remember the casino idea in Gwinnett awhile back?
Norcross Could Land A Mega Video Gambling Facility - Just Don't Call It A Casino - Development Du Jour - Curbed Atlanta
Well it's the same area as the now Plan Movie studio
Movie studio partner signed | www.ajc.com

This is not random......... it's Gwinnett Village Gwinnett Village CID - RedevelopmentGwinnett Village

The Braves moving to Cumberland was not part of Cumberland original plans by default follows Cumberland original plans. Cause the goal is to grow and urbanize. And they want to connect to Atlanta,




But let me say this cause the crime and transit thing pop up. Being scare that transit will bring Crime is very illogical that saying Criminals don't have cars.......... Criminals don't have to wait on transit to come to your house........ that paranoia. Also news flesh it would be a lot harder carrying stolen goods TV's and etc using public transportation vs. using a car which criminals already could.

But imagine someone breaking a entry, steal then head to the bus stop then patiently wait..........


http://media3.giphy.com/media/ISOckXUybVfQ4/giphy.gif

Then ride the bus with a bunch of stolen goods wearing black lmao, now wait at the transit stations I mean they can't change clothes you have stolen goods that they're hand carrying, now ride transit. with a bunch of stolen goods wearing black, then I guess walk the few blocks home.........


Again paranoia on over load that people convince something make sense but doesn't. It's purely illogical. First off Criminal have cars, What paradoxical world that must someone live in to think criminals don't have cars and can't already travel to the suburbs? it's paranoia you might as well be scare of being human. 2nd Public transportation is very inefficient for criminal to use you have be dumbiest of the dumb to be a criminal and use public transportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 08:01 PM
 
39 posts, read 33,764 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiatldal View Post
What kill me about this is debate and I been saying this before the 2012 that Business Community itself not just the " liberals / progressives" is for transit.

The 20 county metro area alone is project to be over 8 million by 2040. Leaders are not just looking at fixing current issues but preventing future ones. "CID" Community Improvement Districts...........Are Districts organize by business leaders, who taxes themselves to improve their communities. The studies and trasits plan were funded by largely CID's. If you noticed The transit plans are planned to connecting the CID. There are more CID but these CID's have plan of urbanizing.


Cumberland Community Improvement District,
Town Center Area Community Improvement District

Gwinnett Place Community Improvement District,
Gwinnett Village Community Improvement District


North Fulton Community Improvement District
Perimeter Community Improvement District
Buckhead Community Improvement District
Midtown alliance (Midtown Community Improvement District)
central atlanta progress (Downtown Community Improvement District)

Airport East CID/Airport West CID (hartsfield jackson's Community Improvement District)

Atlanta obliviously can't and isn't going to take all of the metro growth. But just cause all the growth in the metro area won't to be completely in Atlanta core doesn't mean all growth will be sprawl. So the ARC is looking areas town centers like Decatur, Corridors like Cliffton, Buford Hwy, Cobb Parkway, Build more urban edge cities and urbanize the current Cumberland and Perimeter more. And Connect these centers. The locations where transit is plan is not random it's comprehensive with a bunch of other plans in these counties.


Yall remember the casino idea in Gwinnett awhile back?
Norcross Could Land A Mega Video Gambling Facility - Just Don't Call It A Casino - Development Du Jour - Curbed Atlanta
Well it's the same area as the now Plan Movie studio
Movie studio partner signed | www.ajc.com

This is not random......... it's Gwinnett Village Gwinnett Village CID - RedevelopmentGwinnett Village

The Braves moving to Cumberland was not part of Cumberland original plans by default follows Cumberland original plans. Cause the goal is to grow and urbanize. And they want to connect to Atlanta,




But let me say this cause the crime and transit thing pop up. Being scare that transit will bring Crime is very illogical that saying Criminals don't have cars.......... Criminals don't have to wait on transit to come to your house........ that paranoia. Also news flesh it would be a lot harder carrying stolen goods TV's and etc using public transportation vs. using a car which criminals already could.

But imagine someone breaking a entry, steal then head to the bus stop then patiently wait..........


http://media3.giphy.com/media/ISOckXUybVfQ4/giphy.gif

Then ride the bus with a bunch of stolen goods wearing black lmao, now wait at the transit stations I mean they can't change clothes you have stolen goods that they're hand carrying, now ride transit. with a bunch of stolen goods wearing black, then I guess walk the few blocks home.........


Again paranoia on over load that people convince something make sense but doesn't. It's purely illogical. First off Criminal have cars, What paradoxical world that must someone live in to think criminals don't have cars and can't already travel to the suburbs? it's paranoia you might as well be scare of being human. 2nd Public transportation is very inefficient for criminal to use you have be dumbiest of the dumb to be a criminal and use public transportation.
Criminals are most likely to commit crimes in neighborhoods that they live in. If poor people don't live in your neighborhood then your chances of being a victim go down drastically. Compare violent crime rates in downtown, east point, college park, west end, and buckhead, brookhaven, and decatur. All are car accessible and yet the differences in violent crime are drastic. Mass transit access makes an area more likely to have poor people in it. Avoid mass transit, decrease the attractiveness of your community to lower class residents. Pretty simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 08:08 PM
 
39 posts, read 33,764 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by skbl17 View Post
It would have been illegal under the MARTA Act of 1965 (as amended in 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2015) for Clayton to get MARTA rail service at 0.5%, the sales tax level that the commission was first proposing. Some county commissioners hinted at pursuing the same high-capacity promise on a 0.5% sales tax, which would not have been possible:



That is, unless Clayton residents just wanted the buses, but I think there is an expectation of rail service.

Now, as to the whole "we won't join MARTA because our money will only go to subsidize the rest of the system", which is the criticism you brought up, again, MARTA has ways to ensure that such a thing doesn't happen. Returning to the Clayton saga from last year:



It would be possible for Cobb and MARTA to conclude a contract on the county's membership in MARTA, with some kind of caveat that states that "75% of sales tax funds collected in Cobb County will be put in a separate account for Cobb-only rail service", similar to the Clayton deal. Of course, Cobb and MARTA have to get to the negotiations table first.

- skbl17
The MARTA board is taking [an] extraordinary step to reassure Clayton that its full penny, if approved, won’t go toward expanding transit services in other counties as some commissioners have feared. Included in MARTA’s contract offer is language that ensures unspent sales tax money collected in Clayton is kept in a separate escrow account, to be used only for the purposes of expanding “high-capacity passenger service” (ie: commuter or heavy rail) in Clayton.

You only bolded the second half of the sentence. I would like to know what they mean by "unspent sales tax money".

And honestly I don't care anyways, I don't want to be part of Marta regardless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 09:57 PM
 
Location: NW Atlanta
6,503 posts, read 6,122,823 times
Reputation: 4463
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcredskins View Post
And honestly I don't care anyways, I don't want to be part of Marta regardless.
You could've just stated this in the first place.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Prescott, AZ
5,559 posts, read 4,695,326 times
Reputation: 2284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gulch View Post
You could've just stated this in the first place.
I felt it was pretty obvious. They don't givr any way or condition to be satisfied with MARTA. They simply refuse it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:33 PM
 
39 posts, read 33,764 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by fourthwarden View Post
I felt it was pretty obvious. They don't givr any way or condition to be satisfied with MARTA. They simply refuse it.
Yea those crazy people who don't want to pay for something they won't use and think will have a negative impact on their life.

I used to live on Apple Valley Rd right next to the Brookhaven Marta and the only impact it had on me was random homeless bums walking down my street that came from the Marta station. And the 1% sales tax I paid to never use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:41 PM
 
4,843 posts, read 6,105,497 times
Reputation: 4670
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcredskins View Post
Criminals are most likely to commit crimes in neighborhoods that they live in. If poor people don't live in your neighborhood then your chances of being a victim go down drastically. Compare violent crime rates in downtown, east point, college park, west end, and buckhead, brookhaven, and decatur. All are car accessible and yet the differences in violent crime are drastic. Mass transit access makes an area more likely to have poor people in it. Avoid mass transit, decrease the attractiveness of your community to lower class residents. Pretty simple.
A whole bunch of unrelated stuff you connected the dots with which goes back with what I saying.

Poor ≠ Crime
Poor ≠ No Car
Criminal differently ≠ no car
Transit ≠ Poor

1. Poor people can have Cars You understand significant amount people in those neighborhoods have cars no different than suburban counties right?..........

2. You built this mindset that transit is keeping them from you........ when it's erroneous. People already have cars to do everything what transit do, go beyond. The "poor" already have the cars to drive to live in your neighborhood, Transit is not what preventing them or enabling them to do that.

3. The People who are riding transit aren't likely the criminals. Cause "public" transportation is a very stupid thing for a criminal to take.

4. Many cities across the US nevertheless the world have lower crime rates and a more extensive transit network. it's unrelated.

5. Many lower income areas in Metro Atlanta never minded cross the country has a lack of transit but are lower income, again unrelated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-05-2015, 10:48 PM
 
39 posts, read 33,764 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiatldal View Post
A whole bunch of unrelated stuff you connected the dots with which goes back with what I saying.

Poor ≠ Crime
Poor ≠ No Car
Criminal differently ≠ no car
Transit ≠ Poor

1. Poor people can have Cars You understand significant amount people in those neighborhoods have cars no different than suburban counties right?..........

2. You built this mindset that transit is keeping them from you........ when it's erroneous. People already have cars to do everything what transit do, go beyond. The "poor" already have the cars to drive to live in your neighborhood, Transit is not what preventing them or enabling them to do that.

3. The People who are riding transit aren't likely the criminals. Cause "public" transportation is a very stupid thing for a criminal to take.

4. Many cities across the US nevertheless the world have lower crime rates and a more extensive transit network. it's unrelated.

5. Many lower income areas in Metro Atlanta never minded cross the country has a lack of transit but are lower income, again unrelated.
Poor areas do = crime. What other excuse do you have for the crime rates in College Park? Just random?

And Clayton County, which is relatively poor, wants to join Marta and rich Cobb doesn't want to join. Also just coincidence?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top