Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-29-2013, 03:48 PM
 
43,680 posts, read 44,425,236 times
Reputation: 20577

Advertisements

Open-source airplane could cost just $15,000 – What's Next - CNN.com Blogs

Any thoughts on this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-29-2013, 03:53 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chava61 View Post
I think I'd love to have a decent $15,000 airplane.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 03:56 PM
 
Location: In exile
534 posts, read 905,280 times
Reputation: 1402
is your life worth a $15,000 airframe?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 04:11 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christinerica View Post
is your life worth a $15,000 airframe?

Can you prove a direct correlation between cost and safety of an airframe?

After all, I'd say at one time Bonanzas were crashing more regularly than C150s.

What's inherently unsafe about something simple like a J3?

Considering how much simpler an airplane is than an auto, no transmission, differential, suspension, A/C, power accessories, etc., why shouldn't $15K be a reasonable target for a light 2 seater?

Last edited by burdell; 07-29-2013 at 04:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 04:31 PM
 
Location: In exile
534 posts, read 905,280 times
Reputation: 1402
Simply a thought, you get what you pay for.
The Yugo was a good example of price over quality. "But its your tour on this blue marble" a Marine once said to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 04:54 PM
 
27,957 posts, read 39,795,818 times
Reputation: 26197
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christinerica View Post
Simply a thought, you get what you pay for.
The Yugo was a good example of price over quality. "But its your tour on this blue marble" a Marine once said to me.
You need to quit thinking in automotive terms.

The argument can be made that plans built or kit built aircraft are of better quality than a manufactured airplane. In that the guy building it has his/her own safety in mind first and foremost.

The Piper Cub is the prime example of low cost, simple airplane that has earned a solid reputation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 05:22 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,330 posts, read 54,419,437 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christinerica View Post
Simply a thought, you get what you pay for.
The Yugo was a good example of price over quality. "But its your tour on this blue marble" a Marine once said to me.
Most people who build things like airplanes may only pay themselves pennies an hour but for the most part get far more than they pay for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 07:10 PM
 
14,611 posts, read 17,578,057 times
Reputation: 7783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christinerica View Post
Simply a thought, you get what you pay for.
Probably not the best comparison. When you buy a car, you are paying for a complete turnkey vehicle. You are counting on the robots and the workers who spent minutes on your car in doing a good job.

This open source airplane will only be built by people with some skills at assembly. There will be fewer pre-cut pieces. The pilot will run an exhaustive check before he flies each and every time.

The Easy Eagle is already on the market as a kit for less than $15,000 which can carry one person for up to 300 miles. It just remains to be seen what the open source plane will offer. I assume that they are talking about at least a 2 seater and possibly a little faster than 100 mph.

EASY EAGLE SPECIFICATIONS
Span 18'4"
Length 14'4"
Engine 1915cc VW 65HP
Empty Weight 454 LBS
Useful Load 283 LBS
Wing Area 90 SQ. FT.
Seats 1

EASY EAGLE PERFORMANCE
Take Off Distance 450 FT
Stall 45 MPH
Landing Speed 55 MPH
Cruise 95 MPH
Rate Of Climb 700 FPM

The EASY EAGLE is available from:
GREAT PLAINS AIRCRAFT 7011 N 160 Ave Bennington, NE 68007 Phone 402 493 6507
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-29-2013, 07:36 PM
 
Location: Saint Louis, MO
3,483 posts, read 9,021,827 times
Reputation: 2480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christinerica View Post
Simply a thought, you get what you pay for.
The Yugo was a good example of price over quality. "But its your tour on this blue marble" a Marine once said to me.
Much of what you pay for in a commercially available aircraft are future litigation expenses on the part of the manufacturer. When some yahoo rigs his flight controls backwards doing unauthorized maintenance on the aircraft, no one is going to sue the idiot who crashed his own plane...but you can bet his family will find a way to sue the manufacturer (follow the money) for designing an airplane that COULD have flight controls installed backwards.

For the price, you simply can't beat the performance you can find on the market. 200 mph burning 5 gallons / hour for $60k is far ahead of anything you can buy from the manufacturers.

This really isn't a Yugo situation friend, it simply isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: God's Gift to Mankind for flying anything
5,921 posts, read 13,861,767 times
Reputation: 5229
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chava61 View Post
Any thoughts on this?
Yes, for those who naysay this *effort* ... , hell it is an experimental unit and therefore YOUR experiment !
So, go for it and haff phun !

We built our Experimental in 8 week ends.
But ... , over 200 hours of sketches and calculations.
The hardest part was to keep it under 254 lbs !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Aviation
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top