Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That 72-10 Bulls team lost Game 3 of the second round and only had to win 3 games in the first round. I would still put the Spurs over that team if they go 16-0.
Hence why no one takes you serious...
This Spurs team is great but and an ALL-Time great team in a lock out shorten seasoned? Please... Y'all are going overboard
They couldn't beat the 80's Lakers, Celtics, late 80's Pistons, 90's Bulls, or the early 2K's Lakers.
This Spurs team is great but and an ALL-Time great team in a lock out shorten seasoned? Please... Y'all are going overboard
They couldn't beat the 80's Lakers, Celtics, late 80's Pistons, 90's Bulls, or the early 2K's Lakers.
How do you know who could beat who? Those teams of the past will never play this current Spurs team so how would you know who's actually better? Your viewpoint is just a biased opinion just like everybody else's. In my biased opinion this current San Antonio team could whip any of the so-called great teams you mention.
This Spurs team is great but and an ALL-Time great team in a lock out shorten seasoned? Please... Y'all are going overboard
They couldn't beat the 80's Lakers, Celtics, late 80's Pistons, 90's Bulls, or the early 2K's Lakers.
None of those teams played a ridiculous schedule like this season. 66 games, 1 game every 1.8 days, this shortened season is tougher then any regular season to date. And IF these spurs go 16-0 that takes their streak to 26 games. They IMO would hang with those teams mentioned fairly well.
How do you know who could beat who? Those teams of the past will never play this current Spurs team so how would you know who's actually better? Your viewpoint is just a biased opinion just like everybody else's. In my biased opinion this current San Antonio team could whip any of the so-called great teams you mention.
Yea I'm being literal...
No s**t it's my biased opinion. did u think of that all on ur own? Smart guy u are...
The 2000 Lakers team wasn't that strong, I remember how they were BEAT in the WCF when they were down by 15 in the 4th qtr and bad coaching by the Blazers caused the Lakers to come back and win.
The 2000 Lakers team wasn't that strong, I remember how they were BEAT in the WCF when they were down by 15 in the 4th qtr and bad coaching by the Blazers caused the Lakers to come back and win.
2001 and 2002 I will say were strong teams.
It was a general statement. Hell I don't know which specific year they were the best. but winning 3 straight is the point.
No s**t it's my biased opinion. did u think of that all on ur own? Smart guy u are...
Hey man. I was simply describing the idiotic nature of your own post. You don't have to make this personal. Having an attitude like that doesn't bode well for you sticking around this board long. Lighten up already.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
