Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
so the 1st week is done. im not sure which is more surprising the lakers 1-3 start, the rockets 2-1 start, or the knicks having a +18 ppg differential in their 2-0 start. or hell maybe its the magics 2-0 start with a +17 ppg differential.
i have to say, november is gonna suck for local spurs fans, 14 games but 10 on the road. a 4 game trip and a 6 game trip. plus another 4 game trip next month, then the 9 game trip for the rodeo in february. at least they have 14 in march and only 2 of them are on the road.
Man, the Warriors just can't catch a break. Their sixth-man Brandon Rush likely out for the season with a torn ACL.
I watched them against the Clippers on Saturday night. They have a lot of potential. Adding Jarret Jack was a good move. He made some big plays to win that game. They have a nice mix of young talent there. I can see them making the playoffs.
Bulls are pretty much exactly what I thought they would be without Rose. Kinda boring, playing close tough games. A roseless bulls has 40-44 wins written all over it.
Amazing (to me) fact...... Tonight's win over the pacers sent the spurs to 4-0 to start the season. The amazing part, that's the best start in franchise history. It's amazing to me that with all the great teams, champions and the like this is the 1st time the spurs have ever gone 4-0 to start. Hmmmm
so the 1st week is done. im not sure which is more surprising the lakers 1-3 start, the rockets 2-1 start, or the knicks having a +18 ppg differential in their 2-0 start. or hell maybe its the magics 2-0 start with a +17 ppg differential.
Definitely Orlando. Honestly believe they are the NBA's worst team. I mean, what team has less talent then these f'n bums?? Superman intercoursed this franchise good.
Bulls are pretty much exactly what I thought they would be without Rose. Kinda boring, playing close tough games. A roseless bulls has 40-44 wins written all over it.
I'll take the over at 44wins. They were well over >60% wins last year without rose and that's 49 wins.
I peg them to finish somewhere around 50+ wins in the east.
I'll take the over at 44wins. They were well over >60% wins last year without rose and that's 49 wins.
I peg them to finish somewhere around 50+ wins in the east.
lol
Put it down man, put it down. You have to be smoking if you think that team is a 50 win team. I understand your love for your team, but be realistic. They have lost to the Hornets already to start the season. Do you know how difficult it is to win 50 games? There are so many things that would have to go well. You are about to see it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
