Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-09-2010, 09:50 AM
 
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
36,659 posts, read 67,539,821 times
Reputation: 21244

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Guineas View Post
That's the stupidest attempt to make a point I've ever seen.
Why the bloody hell do you feel the need to so damn hostile?



Quote:
Those metro areas in CA have insane (like double, triple) housing prices compared to say Midland TX, Denver CO, or Minneapolis MN.
I thought conservatives believed in the free market?

Are you saying that we should regulate home prices?

Didnt think so.

Location, Location, Location. Some places are vastly more desirable than others.

That's life.

Live there and work your @ss off to afford it, otherwise, move somewhere cheaper.

Quote:
Are the median incomes double or triple? Hell no.
And yet 4 California Metros are among the places where people save the most money.

In fact, most of the cities with the residents that save the most would be considered expensive places to live.


Quote:

Nest Egg Index-Cities with the most savings
In the third annual Nest Egg Index, we ranked the 500 top-performing communities based on their residents' personal savings and investing behavior. By measuring a dozen statistical factors - including participation in retirement savings plans, personal debt levels and home ownership - the Nest Egg Index shows the geographic regions where people are succeeding and facing difficulty with their nest eggs. In this year's results, communities that ranked highly in the Nest Egg Index continue to benefit from strong local housing markets and show a high propensity toward saving and investing in retirement vehicles such as 401(k) or pension plans. And while these communities had higher costs of living than the national average, nineteen out of the top 20 also had lower debt levels.

1 Los Alamos, NM
2 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA
3 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT
4 Torrington, CT
5 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
6 Barnstable Town, MA
7 Minneapolis-St Paul-Bloomington, MN
8 Holland-Grand Haven, MI
9 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA
10 Edwards, CO
11 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-MD-VA
12 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA
13 Gardnerville-Ranchos, NV
14 Rochester, MN
15 Red Wing, MN
16 Appleton, WI
17 Faribault-Northfield, MN
18 Trenton-Ewing, NJ
19 Naples-Marco Island, FL
20 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT
21 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA
22 Norwich-New London, CT
23 Lexington Park, MD
24 Boulder, CO
25 Juneau, AK

Nest Egg Index - Your Financial Nest Egg: A.G. Edwards
Very few dirt cheap states are represented in this list. Isnt that ironic?
LMAO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:18 AM
 
2,963 posts, read 6,263,596 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Other California MSAs
198 Redding, CA (MSA) 34,527
260 Chico, CA (MSA) 32,349
282 Stockton, CA (MSA) 31,547
286 Modesto, CA (MSA) 31,485
297 Fresno, CA (MSA) 30,997
307 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (MSA) 30,634
325 12540 Bakersfield-Delano, CA (MSA) 30,047
354 El Centro, CA (MSA) 27,666
357 Hanford-Corcoran, CA (MSA) 26,734
358 Madera-Chowchilla, CA (MSA) 26,524
Jeez what an embarrassment to the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:55 AM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,394,395 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highnlite View Post
The cost of living in California really is not that different from most desirable places. I can tell you that Nevada is on a par with California, but you don't get fresh fruit and vegetables, and the fish smell like fish.

Here, try this, instead of whining about how awful California is, vote with your feet, find that better place and move to it, life is to short to spend whining.
Or, go outside, get in your carcachita and head for the hills, or the beach, go for a hike, rent a boat, climb a mountain, make living a verb not a noun.

"free handout from the government?
Like the Conservative Republican farmers in the Central Valley using state subsidized water?
Or the Conservative Republican Ranchers grazing on public land and paying AUM's a quarter of what they would pay on private land?
Or the Conservative Republican loggers cutting low cost timber on Public land?
Or the Conservative Republican miners extracting minerals from public land and paying no taxes or royalty on those minerals?
Or the Conservative Republican oilmen extracting oil from our public land and paying no royalty?
Welfare Ranchers, loggers, miners, oilmen, getting what amounts to free handouts subsidized by the rest of us TaxPayers.

I like the Conservative Republican farmers who are happy to complain about all that big government, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, the legislature in Sacramento, the onerous regulations foisted on them by "them Liberals", the whole conservative Republican litany of grievances, but they fall strangely silent on the subject of illegals. Knowing that their income, and a substantial portion of the GDP of the State of California is due to the hard work of the illegal farm worker.

I think we call that, hypocrisy.
I'm so glad you addressed this. Every one of these threads is the same sorry attempt to bash liberals and Ca.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 10:57 AM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,394,395 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Why the bloody hell do you feel the need to so damn hostile?




I thought conservatives believed in the free market?

Are you saying that we should regulate home prices?

Didnt think so.

Location, Location, Location. Some places are vastly more desirable than others.

That's life.

Live there and work your @ss off to afford it, otherwise, move somewhere cheaper.


And yet 4 California Metros are among the places where people save the most money.

In fact, most of the cities with the residents that save the most would be considered expensive places to live.




Very few dirt cheap states are represented in this list. Isnt that ironic?
LMAO.
LOL nice
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Austin Texas
474 posts, read 905,567 times
Reputation: 534
Quote:
Originally Posted by 18Montclair View Post
Why the bloody hell do you feel the need to so damn hostile?




I thought conservatives believed in the free market?

Are you saying that we should regulate home prices?

Didnt think so.

Location, Location, Location. Some places are vastly more desirable than others.

That's life.

Live there and work your @ss off to afford it, otherwise, move somewhere cheaper.


And yet 4 California Metros are among the places where people save the most money.

In fact, most of the cities with the residents that save the most would be considered expensive places to live.




Very few dirt cheap states are represented in this list. Isnt that ironic?
LMAO.
Your "Nest Egg Index" is a 2007 ranking. There is none newer - perhaps because A.G. Edwards is no longer doing it. But that index includes home ownership. I bet the rankings would be different now all over the US with significantly lower housing values. If home prices in CA are 30-40% lower today than they were in 2006 (when much of the raw data was collected for any 2007 rankings) it seems likely many CA cities on that list would drop significantly.

What would unemployment do to those rankings?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 01:38 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,391,849 times
Reputation: 1802
Republicans always want to make California into another Texas where big corporations rape the environment and little if any safeguards are provided to the average person. One huge reason that California is more expensive is that it is a "jewel" that can not be polluted into an ugly Texas. Smog is a major concern in California and it doesn't matter how much we need jobs if they are in industries that pollute the air and water. Uncontrolled population growth is discouraged as much as possible and in many counties there are strict regulations on new development for the very reason that there is not enough water. Now Texas power companies are spending big $ on Proposition 23 that would stop or slow down signed legislative law setting higher standards on clean energy.

California is not Texas and thank God, never will be!

STOP the Texas Oil Companies' Dirty Energy Proposition
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Brisbane, Australia
961 posts, read 2,566,765 times
Reputation: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Highnlite View Post
"free handout from the government?
Like the Conservative Republican farmers in the Central Valley using state subsidized water?
Or the Conservative Republican Ranchers grazing on public land and paying AUM's a quarter of what they would pay on private land?
Or the Conservative Republican loggers cutting low cost timber on Public land?
Or the Conservative Republican miners extracting minerals from public land and paying no taxes or royalty on those minerals?
Or the Conservative Republican oilmen extracting oil from our public land and paying no royalty?
Welfare Ranchers, loggers, miners, oilmen, getting what amounts to free handouts subsidized by the rest of us TaxPayers.

I like the Conservative Republican farmers who are happy to complain about all that big government, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, the legislature in Sacramento, the onerous regulations foisted on them by "them Liberals", the whole conservative Republican litany of grievances, but they fall strangely silent on the subject of illegals. Knowing that their income, and a substantial portion of the GDP of the State of California is due to the hard work of the illegal farm worker.

I think we call that, hypocrisy.
Very good points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 03:02 PM
 
739 posts, read 1,848,598 times
Reputation: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by ryanst530 View Post
What's even sadder to me is the fact that liberals refuse to admit their own policies and tactics are to blame.
Hmmmm.... How to say this politely.... Bull$h!t.
Ever heard of a little thing called Proposition 13? It was California's death knell.
Howard Jarvis, that great republican, got the ball rolling and it's been gathering speed as it rolled downhill ever since.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 03:05 PM
 
739 posts, read 1,848,598 times
Reputation: 816
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfoot Tracks View Post
You are right, but I bet they get voted in again in November.
The reason the libs will get voted back in is this. The hard working class of people are out numbered by people that either work for the Government or get some free handout from the Government and they do not want things to be different.
Did you forget about having a republican governor since October of 2003?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2010, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Brisbane, Australia
961 posts, read 2,566,765 times
Reputation: 213
You have to hand it to Republicans though, they are the best spin doctors in the politics! All we hear about these days is how the darn Liberals have ruined everything! They definitely know how to divert attention from their epic failures, which are too many to list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top