Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-01-2012, 12:14 AM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,394,395 times
Reputation: 9059

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradleyyo View Post
I agree. That's why Nathan Fletcher left the Republican Party. He felt they are too extreme. I would have no problem voting for a Republican if they all weren't Jan Brewers and Sarah Palins. Democrats are much safer now in my opinion.
Exactly. Before John McCain picked that Moose eating halfwit, he actually appealed to me to some degree. He was once a moderate Republican that seemed genuine and compassionate. He knew he would have been killed on the battle field if he didn't change tactics. Sad really.

 
Old 08-01-2012, 12:40 AM
 
Location: Near L.A.
4,108 posts, read 10,804,487 times
Reputation: 3444
Does somebody care to tell me how having a basically one party state is the best thing for the state?

Now, does somebody care to tell me how having a one party-controlled legislature since the 1970s and Democrats/RINOs for governor since the late 1990s has been the best for state politics? And its economic, educational and fiscal health for that matter?

Anybody?

For the record, before someone calls me a "nut," Tennessee is very Republican-controlled and while it is much more business-friendly than much of the U.S., it is going on the crazy train with regard to conservative beliefs on social issues. Google them. The only other Southern states so socially conservative are Alabama and Mississippi (and even Mississippi voters defeated a strict anti-abortion initiative in 2011).
 
Old 08-01-2012, 08:54 AM
 
Location: San Diego
50,294 posts, read 47,056,299 times
Reputation: 34079
Anyone that is a die hard partisan voter scares me.
 
Old 08-01-2012, 09:33 AM
 
7,150 posts, read 10,900,367 times
Reputation: 3806
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
Anyone that is a die hard partisan voter scares me.
You scare easy ...
 
Old 08-01-2012, 09:56 AM
 
Location: San Diego, California Republic
16,588 posts, read 27,394,395 times
Reputation: 9059
Quote:
Originally Posted by EclecticEars View Post
Does somebody care to tell me how having a basically one party state is the best thing for the state?

Now, does somebody care to tell me how having a one party-controlled legislature since the 1970s and Democrats/RINOs for governor since the late 1990s has been the best for state politics? And its economic, educational and fiscal health for that matter?

Anybody?

For the record, before someone calls me a "nut," Tennessee is very Republican-controlled and while it is much more business-friendly than much of the U.S., it is going on the crazy train with regard to conservative beliefs on social issues. Google them. The only other Southern states so socially conservative are Alabama and Mississippi (and even Mississippi voters defeated a strict anti-abortion initiative in 2011).
Well it really isn't the best thing. I don't think anyone said it was. One party systems regardless of ideology have never been good for any entity. One thing to consider though, California is still part of a larger national entity yet at times it's spoken about as if it were a separate nation that will have it's own problems that the rest of the nation will somehow sit back and laugh at. Won't happen.

Now having said all that, the state needs variety in it's political system like any other political system to remain healthy. The GOP just isn't the one, they don't represent most Californians anymore so are losing ground. There are other parties out there which may be a better fit to offer some variety to our political system. The greens could rise up which would then make the Dems the more conservative party but that's how this state operates. Except for a few enclaves here and there, we're not a Tea Party state.
 
Old 08-01-2012, 10:01 AM
 
Location: Metro Phoenix
11,039 posts, read 16,866,369 times
Reputation: 12950
I think that it's a good thing to have different parties and voices to balance things out and make sure that everyone is fairly represented; because of this, even as a liberal, I am not exactly throwing a party about the notion that the counterpoint is in decline.

That said, since the GOP's new M.O. seems to be obstruction and gridlock with no realistic or reasonable solutions making their way to to the top, I can't say that I view this as an empirically "bad" thing. The Tea Partification of the GOP may have gotten them votes and attention in the short term by appealing to frustration and anger with the most hamfisted, loudmouthed statements and politics they could muster, but in the long term, the validity of their methods and goals shakes out and people don't support it.
 
Old 08-01-2012, 10:34 AM
 
1,058 posts, read 1,160,114 times
Reputation: 624
Honestly if either one of the tax proposals pass, the GOP is dead in California. The only thing that the GOP has to offer an average Californian is lower taxes (or more realistically the same taxes). Most of the culture war crap doesn't sell to well (obvious Prop 8 was an exception) in California.


Maybe in the future if California is completely broke, then the voters might elect a Republican governor.
 
Old 08-01-2012, 10:42 AM
 
1,331 posts, read 2,335,485 times
Reputation: 1095
I agree that it is good to have balance in politics.

But when it comes to things like congress, it creates a traffic jam so to speak. Nothing is accomplished because most of them vote party lines.

I consider myself to be pretty liberal but I think balance is a fine thing and we need more of it but right now, the current GOP crop is just not what we need as a state or a country. Every time I hear one of those Tea Party buffoons like Bachmann or Palin speak, I feel like my IQ has dropped and we are back in the 1800's or something.
 
Old 08-01-2012, 10:48 AM
 
Location: Bay Area
1,790 posts, read 2,927,316 times
Reputation: 1277
Quote:
Originally Posted by EclecticEars View Post
Does somebody care to tell me how having a basically one party state is the best thing for the state?

Now, does somebody care to tell me how having a one party-controlled legislature since the 1970s and Democrats/RINOs for governor since the late 1990s has been the best for state politics? And its economic, educational and fiscal health for that matter?

Anybody?

For the record, before someone calls me a "nut," Tennessee is very Republican-controlled and while it is much more business-friendly than much of the U.S., it is going on the crazy train with regard to conservative beliefs on social issues. Google them. The only other Southern states so socially conservative are Alabama and Mississippi (and even Mississippi voters defeated a strict anti-abortion initiative in 2011).
are you calling schwarzenegghead a democrat?
 
Old 08-01-2012, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Orange County, CA
3,727 posts, read 6,224,716 times
Reputation: 4257
Quote:
Originally Posted by bradleyyo View Post
Every time I hear one of those Tea Party buffoons like Bachmann or Palin speak, I feel like my IQ has dropped and we are back in the 1800's or something.
Every time I hear one of those Marxist buffoons like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Wasserman-Scultz, et all speak I feel like I am being subjected to excerpts from Das Kapital or the Communist Manifesto and we are back in 1917 Russia.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top