Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Agreed. It was the extreme liberals in the 1960's who ushered in the antichrist age. He'll be making his appearance in this generation, as it is written. The liberals will love him, as he'll have the same spirit as Obama.
????? My reasoning tells me that the Constitution does not, anywhere, address who can marry whom. So therefore, by the constitution's own rules, who can marry whom is a decision left to "the people".
The Tenth, which relegates to the States all powers not specifically
enumerated to the Federal government.
Moreover, Federal recognition of marriage and the business of the Federal
government having any say in marriage is a violation of the Constitution
just like Antonio Scalia said in his dissent.
SCOTUS nowhere proclaimed that the feds have jurisdiction over marriage. They said that if a homosexual couple contracted a legal marriage in one state that the marriage was legal in all states.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowball7
Oh, and pornography can be illegal also, like it was in most States.
Obscenity laws.
Obviously we disagree, but I am very GLAD that no government is now peeking over my shoulder when I'm reading.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
