Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-15-2010, 08:20 PM
 
Location: Redding, Ca
1,248 posts, read 1,257,899 times
Reputation: 125

Advertisements

Quote:
Mike555 The second resurrection is the resurrection of unbelievers only. Revelation 20:11-15. They are resurrected from the compartment of Torments in Hades. This takes place at the end of the Millennium. These unbelievers are judged by Jesus Christ Himself and thrown into the eternal lake of fire forever.
When Jesus went to hell: (Psa 16:10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption), Jesus visited the souls there: Isa 24:22 And they shall be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered in the pit, and shall be shut up in the prison, and after many days shall they be visited.

Yes, visited and released them, for God :Psa 107:16 For he hath broken the gates of brass, and cut the bars of iron in sunder.

Isa 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;

That is the first resurrection, not preceding Christ, but after Christ for He is the first.

Blessings, AJ

 
Old 02-15-2010, 10:26 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
33,230 posts, read 26,455,707 times
Reputation: 16370
Quote:
Originally Posted by look3467 View Post
When Jesus went to hell: (Psa 16:10 For thou wilt not leave my soul in hell; neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption), Jesus visited the souls there: Isa 24:22 And they shall be gathered together, as prisoners are gathered in the pit, and shall be shut up in the prison, and after many days shall they be visited.
Yes, visited and released them, for God :Psa 107:16 For he hath broken the gates of brass, and cut the bars of iron in sunder.
Isa 61:1 The Spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me; because the LORD hath anointed me to preach good tidings unto the meek; he hath sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the prison to them that are bound;
That is the first resurrection, not preceding Christ, but after Christ for He is the first.
Blessings, AJ
If you're referring to the transference of believers from the compartment of Paradise, which before the Cross was in Hades-called Sheol in the Old Testament-to Heaven, that was not a resurrection. Resurrection always refers to the body.

Jesus went to Paradise in Hades after He died. And He took the believers that were in Paradise to Heaven. At some point after His death He also went into Tartarus to proclaim to the fallen angels who were imprisoned there-these were the group of fallen angels that were involved in the Gen. 6 incident that necessitated the flood- to proclaim to them that their leader, Satan had been strategically defeated at the Cross (1 Peter 3:19-20; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6).

The first resurrection refers to the various stages of the resurrection of believers. First, Jesus Christ had to be resurrected because He is the first fruits. The rapture of the church is the first group of believers to be resurrected (1 Thess.4:13-17), followed by the resurrection of Old Testament saints and Tribulational martyrs at the end of the Tribulation. This is mentioned in Revelation 20:4.

Psalms 107, has nothing to do with those who have died. Refer to these links.

Psalm 107:16 for he breaks down gates of bronze and cuts through bars of iron.

USCCB - NAB - Psalm 107
 
Old 02-15-2010, 10:58 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
33,230 posts, read 26,455,707 times
Reputation: 16370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eusebius View Post
That's my point that Jesus wasn't German. Neither was He English and He never used the word "Hell." He used the Greek word Gehenna. There are no demons or devils or Satan in Gehenna and presently no one is in Gehenna. When Jesus comes back they are going to change that area which today is a park into a trash dump where they will burn the offal of the city and burn up dead bodies of criminals who receive the death sentence and are killed then have their dead bodies dumped into that trash dump.
Satan and the fallen angels and unbelieving humanity will in the future be cast into the eternal lake of fire (Revelation 20:11-15) to which the word 'Gehenna' refers. Currently, unbelievers who have died are in Hades, which is often in the English language simply referred to as 'hell.'


Quote:
Actually Jesus never used Gehenna as an illustration for the final and eternal destination of those who die without believing in Christ for salvation. You can't find that anywhere in the Bible, so why say it?
Hell Part 2: The Differences between Hades and the Lake of Fire

Quote:
The Bible never says the words "eternal lake of fire" so why add to the words of that prophecy which John warns people to not do?
Revelation 20:15 'Lake of fire'.

Matthew 25:41 'eternal fire'.

Both are describing the same place. The eternal lake of fire.

Quote:
If that is your take on those verses then you have to conclude that when Israel was held captive in Egypt they too were in a lake of fire for eternity. How they got out is beyond me!
In no way must such a thing be concluded.

Quote:
Well if you would take the time to learn why aionion never refers to 'eternal' maybe you would quit spreading that old and worn out false argument that it does refer to eternal.
As I said, this is a very tired and old argument which has been gone over many times. Any honest research shows that the word aionion can and does in context refer to those things that are of an eternal nature.
 
Old 02-15-2010, 11:16 PM
 
Location: Seattle, Washington
8,435 posts, read 10,530,305 times
Reputation: 1739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike555 View Post



As I said, this is a very tired and old argument which has been gone over many times. Any honest research shows that the word aionion can and does in context refer to those things that are of an eternal nature.
Unfortunately that only leaves one thing... GOD.
God is the only thing that is of eternal nature, without beginning or end anything else cannot.

Therefore the context of temporal things means it is not eternal.. When said about God it means eternal..

Again you need to quit thinking of this as a tired argument and start thinking of it seriously.

What do you know of that has no beginning and end besides God?
 
Old 02-16-2010, 07:25 AM
 
17,966 posts, read 15,972,754 times
Reputation: 1010
Mike, Gehenna can't be the eternal lake of fire because for one, Gehenna is not even being used at this time so how can it be eternal?

Secondly, Gehenna is used only during the 1000 year reign of Christ. Then, at the end of the 1000 years the earth is destroyed along with Gehenna and then the lake of fire comes about.

Thirdly, Matthew 25:46 does not say "eternal fire."

(Concordant Literal Version) And these shall be coming away into chastening eonian, yet the just into life eonian."

(1912 Weymouth New Testament) "And these shall go away into the Punishment of the Ages, but the righteous into the Life of the Ages."

(1898 Young's Literal Translation) And these shall go away to punishment age-during, but the righteous to life age-during.'

και . . .απελευσονται . . . . . . . ουτοι . .εις
and . . shall be coming away . . .these . into

κολασιν . αιωνιον οι δε δικαιοι εις ζωην αιωνιον
chastening eonian . but the just into life eonian

Fourthly, the lake of fire is for the eons of the eons whereas Gehenna is just eonian or pertaining to that eon.
 
Old 02-16-2010, 07:33 AM
 
Location: Germany
1,821 posts, read 2,334,993 times
Reputation: 1031
this are interested links concerning the topic

Contents - Universalism: The Prevailing Doctrine of the Early Church

Mercy And Judgment by Canon F.W. Farrar

The Origin and History of the Doctrine of Endless Punishment

Universalism, the Prevailing Doctrine of the Christian Church During its First Five Hundred Years

History of Opinions on the Scriptural Doctrine of Retribution by Edward Beecher

one should not forget that the writings of the Church fathers might be translated as poor as the bible in many instances and that interpolations have been made in the writings of the churchfather by scribes of later date.

Universalism was neither condemned nor officially declared heresy prior to the 6th century, Basil the Great (4th century) and Augustine (5th century) - both opposed universalism, confirm that the majority (or at least very many) of the Christians in their days believed in universalism.

All the early creeds omit a belief in endless future punishment.
 
Old 02-16-2010, 08:15 AM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
33,230 posts, read 26,455,707 times
Reputation: 16370
Quote:
Originally Posted by katjonjj View Post
Unfortunately that only leaves one thing... GOD.
God is the only thing that is of eternal nature, without beginning or end anything else cannot.
Therefore the context of temporal things means it is not eternal.. When said about God it means eternal..
Again you need to quit thinking of this as a tired argument and start thinking of it seriously.
What do you know of that has no beginning and end besides God?
It is a tired old argument.

The eternal (emphasis looking toward the eternal future from the time of its preparation ) lake of fire was prepared by GOD for the devil and his angels, and for unbelieving humanity. Matthew 25:41 'Depart from Me accursed ones, into the eternal fire which has been prepared for the devil and his angels.''
 
Old 02-16-2010, 08:29 AM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
33,230 posts, read 26,455,707 times
Reputation: 16370
Quote:
Originally Posted by svenM View Post
this are interested links concerning the topic

Contents - Universalism: The Prevailing Doctrine of the Early Church

Mercy And Judgment by Canon F.W. Farrar

The Origin and History of the Doctrine of Endless Punishment

Universalism, the Prevailing Doctrine of the Christian Church During its First Five Hundred Years

History of Opinions on the Scriptural Doctrine of Retribution by Edward Beecher

one should not forget that the writings of the Church fathers might be translated as poor as the bible in many instances and that interpolations have been made in the writings of the churchfather by scribes of later date.

Universalism was neither condemned nor officially declared heresy prior to the 6th century, Basil the Great (4th century) and Augustine (5th century) - both opposed universalism, confirm that the majority (or at least very many) of the Christians in their days believed in universalism.

All the early creeds omit a belief in endless future punishment.
The Apostles and the early church leaders who were comtemporaries of the Apostles did not teach universal salvation. Jesus Christ did not teach universal salvation. Matthew 25:41,46; John 3:18,36; etc...The original post tells when universalism began to be taught.
 
Old 02-16-2010, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Germany
1,821 posts, read 2,334,993 times
Reputation: 1031
the Apostle Paul clearly taught "universalism" (1Tim. 4:10; Col. 1:20, Rom. 5:18, 1Cor. 15:22), it seems that already in his days this teaching was not welcome but was opposed:

For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. (1Tim 4:10)

little seems to have changed over the centuries!
 
Old 02-16-2010, 03:55 PM
 
Location: El Paso, TX
33,230 posts, read 26,455,707 times
Reputation: 16370
Quote:
Originally Posted by svenM View Post
the Apostle Paul clearly taught "universalism" (1Tim. 4:10; Col. 1:20, Rom. 5:18, 1Cor. 15:22), it seems that already in his days this teaching was not welcome but was opposed:

For therefore we both labour and suffer reproach, because we trust in the living God, who is the Saviour of all men, specially of those that believe. (1Tim 4:10)

little seems to have changed over the centuries!
I Already did a thread on 1 Tim. 4:10. It has nothing to do with universal salvation. Christ died for all, so that those who believe in Him will be saved. Salvation is conditional on faith in Christ. Paul did not teach universalism.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top