Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which Mega City Skyline is your favorite?
Chicago 149 41.39%
New York 211 58.61%
Voters: 360. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 04-04-2009, 08:21 PM
 
Location: West Loop Chicago
1,074 posts, read 1,564,493 times
Reputation: 869

Advertisements

Take the Roissybus from CDG to Paris and yes you're going through farmland. Or look out the plane window upon approach and you'll see that CDG is in the middle of farms. How about you look at a map if you don't believe me? BTW - Paris has banlieue, many which are comprised of soviet-style blocks to house the unemployed North African immigrants...guess that's your idea of a real city.

Besides, you're under the mistaken notion that I care whether Chicago is surrounded by farmland because there's nothing wrong with farmland. If anything, I wish Chicago was surrounded by more farmland instead of suburbs since it wastes a lot of taxpayer money to provide infrastructure in lower denisty suburban areas. What's NY's budget deficit again?

 
Old 04-05-2009, 06:24 AM
 
1,327 posts, read 2,610,124 times
Reputation: 1565
There is almost no farmland between Paris and CDG, see with google earth, the only farmland called Barreau de Gonesse will be urbanised soon.
 
Old 04-05-2009, 02:45 PM
 
Location: Oahu
734 posts, read 2,056,117 times
Reputation: 318
The point is virtually every metro area in the world includes some farmland. I'm only seeing half the conversation, though, so others may be making tangential arguments.
 
Old 04-05-2009, 04:14 PM
 
1,437 posts, read 3,076,797 times
Reputation: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by LucasS6 View Post
The point is virtually every metro area in the world includes some farmland. I'm only seeing half the conversation, though, so others may be making tangential arguments.
There's a a lot of things that you only "see half" of!....
 
Old 04-05-2009, 05:07 PM
 
Location: West Loop Chicago
1,074 posts, read 1,564,493 times
Reputation: 869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minato ku View Post
There is almost no farmland between Paris and CDG, see with google earth, the only farmland called Barreau de Gonesse will be urbanised soon.
You proved my point. There is farmland near Paris...even if the farmland between CDG & Paris is urbanised soon (doubtful), there's still a ****load of farmland near CDG, which is only 17 miles outside the city limits of Paris. As you said, see Google Earth or just open your eyes when you're flying in.

I think it's good to have farmland in the metro area, so your argument isn't with me. It's with the Harry Potter fan who says farmland is bad...only if it's near Chicago though.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,624 posts, read 3,295,821 times
Reputation: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hendu View Post
I think it's good to have farmland in the metro area, so your argument isn't with me. It's with the Harry Potter fan who says farmland is bad...only if it's near Chicago though.
The point is not whether it is good or bad to have real farmland in your metro area but what inluences the city: an urbanized, densely populated industrialized region or a farmland, as it reflects on the character of the city. Chicago being a queen of Corn Belt is disadvantaged here as it is being heavily influenced by the primarly agricultural region it is located in.
As a matter of fact you can feel it all around Chicago, mentality of its inhabitants is much closer to that of Peoria than of Boston or Philly. You can build the highest buildings but for the population to change mentality, to becom truly urban - it takes generations. East Coast and its cities are much older and had much more time to go through this process, Chicago is still struggling. Look at New York City and the condensation of cultural institutions in this city, clearly the people there have different needs, different aspirations than Chicagoans.

Last edited by dementor; 04-06-2009 at 10:22 AM..
 
Old 04-06-2009, 02:46 PM
 
464 posts, read 1,080,878 times
Reputation: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by dementor View Post
The point is not whether it is good or bad to have real farmland in your metro area but what inluences the city: an urbanized, densely populated industrialized region or a farmland, as it reflects on the character of the city. Chicago being a queen of Corn Belt is disadvantaged here as it is being heavily influenced by the primarly agricultural region it is located in.
As a matter of fact you can feel it all around Chicago, mentality of its inhabitants is much closer to that of Peoria than of Boston or Philly. You can build the highest buildings but for the population to change mentality, to becom truly urban - it takes generations. East Coast and its cities are much older and had much more time to go through this process, Chicago is still struggling. Look at New York City and the condensation of cultural institutions in this city, clearly the people there have different needs, different aspirations than Chicagoans.
You just typed a lot of garbage. None of that made any valid point at all. It's like you tried to make it something good, but fell short, very short.

Metropolitan Chicago has farms, almost all of DuPage County is one huge farm, same for many parts of Lake County. The sprawling from Lake County to Southern Wisconsin is a string of subdivisions, surrounded by farms. But why does any of this matter to you? If you want to talk about sprawl and farmland being included in Metros, go post on a Houston or DFW Thread.

How long will it take before you learn that you "facts" don't hold any water? You're resulting to talking about farmland in the metro...? Do you realize how sad you look?
 
Old 04-06-2009, 03:59 PM
 
Location: Twilight zone
3,646 posts, read 8,325,911 times
Reputation: 1772
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
You just typed a lot of garbage. None of that made any valid point at all. It's like you tried to make it something good, but fell short, very short.

Metropolitan Chicago has farms, almost all of DuPage County is one huge farm, same for many parts of Lake County. The sprawling from Lake County to Southern Wisconsin is a string of subdivisions, surrounded by farms. But why does any of this matter to you? If you want to talk about sprawl and farmland being included in Metros, go post on a Houston or DFW Thread.

How long will it take before you learn that you "facts" don't hold any water? You're resulting to talking about farmland in the metro...? Do you realize how sad you look?
Even DuPage county has no farms. If anything there's mostly trees in Du Page county. There's also about a million people in Dupage county.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 08:32 PM
 
Location: Chicago - mudhole in the prairie...
1,624 posts, read 3,295,821 times
Reputation: 262
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spire View Post
You just typed a lot of garbage. None of that made any valid point at all. It's like you tried to make it something good, but fell short, very short.
Maybe you should just read it again. Chicago is heavily influenced by the agricultural region it is located in. This reflects on mentality of its population, its culture, art, media, food etc etc. New York on the other hand is located in densely populated Bosh-Wash corridor which industrial and urban traditions are reflected in New York superior culture, arts, media, food and truly urban mentality of its inhabitants. Chicago draws talent from Peoria, Des Moines, Milwaukee and Indy, New York from Philly, Boston, New Jersey and Connecticut.
 
Old 04-06-2009, 08:42 PM
 
2,598 posts, read 4,935,086 times
Reputation: 2275
Quote:
Originally Posted by dementor View Post
Maybe you should just read it again. Chicago is heavily influenced by the agricultural region it is located in. This reflects on mentality of its population, its culture, art, media, food etc etc. New York on the other hand is located in densely populated Bosh-Wash corridor which industrial and urban traditions are reflected in New York superior culture, arts, media, food and truly urban mentality of its inhabitants. Chicago draws talent from Peoria, Des Moines, Milwaukee and Indy, New York from Philly, Boston, New Jersey and Connecticut.
Skyline - stay on topic. This isn't a "Bash Chicago in Any Conceivable Way" thread - it's a skyline thread. Your posts all sound the same.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top