Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-23-2020, 11:42 AM
 
6,345 posts, read 8,118,908 times
Reputation: 8784

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG183 View Post
Gov. Cuomo just announced the results of New York state's random antibody testing:


https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/23/new-...uomo-says.html


Statistically speaking, 3000 people is a very good sample size. And, the people tested were all out & about. So with that percentage of people having antibodies, it means the infection is much more widespread than originally thought -- but that is actually good news, because it drives down the mortality rate. It also adds credibility to the belief that 80% of those infected have minor symptoms (or none at all).
It's a great study to calculate total cases. In NYC, 21.2% of people had antibodies.

0.212 x 8,398,748 (2018 NYC population) = 1,780,535 cases

17,200 (excess deaths) / 1,780,535 = 1% deaths per case

This is better than the German and South Korean numbers, 3% and 2% respectively.

A 1% death rate would be 3 million deaths out of 320 million US population. That's a crazy number. I wonder if the antibody tests are missing people, due to false negatives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:04 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,332,629 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by move4ward View Post
A 1% death rate would be 3 million deaths out of 320 million US population. That's a crazy number. I wonder if the antibody tests are missing people, due to false negatives.
That's assuming all 320 million people in the US get infected, as you get to 60-70% infected, the herd immunity will start to kick in and less and less people should get it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:11 PM
 
7 posts, read 7,115 times
Reputation: 10
Default How long to get over Covid?

My girlfriend likely had Covid. No test that I am aware of but many symptoms and her doctor did a CT scan of her lungs which showed that they were inflamed but no pneumonia. It has now been 30 days since she started having symptoms and she seems to be fully recovered.


At what point is it safe to say that she is not contagious? My googling suggests that it should be fine now, but there are some articles talking about six weeks after symptoms go away. I have had no physical contact with her since this started and I don't want to put myself at risk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:14 PM
 
18,725 posts, read 33,385,615 times
Reputation: 37296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flip123 View Post
...
At what point is it safe to say that she is not contagious? My googling suggests that it should be fine now, but there are some articles talking about six weeks after symptoms go away. I have had no physical contact with her since this started and I don't want to put myself at risk.
Are you sure you don't have it? Asymptomatic transmission and all. Take care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:29 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
4,181 posts, read 5,061,593 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by move4ward View Post
It's a great study to calculate total cases. In NYC, 21.2% of people had antibodies.

0.212 x 8,398,748 (2018 NYC population) = 1,780,535 cases

17,200 (excess deaths) / 1,780,535 = 1% deaths per case

This is better than the German and South Korean numbers, 3% and 2% respectively.

A 1% death rate would be 3 million deaths out of 320 million US population. That's a crazy number. I wonder if the antibody tests are missing people, due to false negatives.

False negatives are more of an issue in tests for the virus itself, not in antibody tests, correct ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:31 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
4,181 posts, read 5,061,593 times
Reputation: 4233
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
that's assuming all 320 million people in the us get infected, as you get to 60-70% infected, the herd immunity will start to kick in and less and less people should get it.

+ 1


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:45 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,102 posts, read 41,261,487 times
Reputation: 45136
Quote:
Originally Posted by move4ward View Post
It's a great study to calculate total cases. In NYC, 21.2% of people had antibodies.

0.212 x 8,398,748 (2018 NYC population) = 1,780,535 cases

17,200 (excess deaths) / 1,780,535 = 1% deaths per case

This is better than the German and South Korean numbers, 3% and 2% respectively.

A 1% death rate would be 3 million deaths out of 320 million US population. That's a crazy number. I wonder if the antibody tests are missing people, due to false negatives.
Keep in mind that most of the deaths are in older folks, so it would be better to look at the population at risk. In NYC about 75% are over 18. Few of the deaths are in the under 18 age group. Also, the people with antibodies are by definition all survivors. You have to add the dead and those infected and not yet recovered or dead to your 21.2%.

I do not think you can extrapolate the NYC numbers to the entire country. The rest of it has areas with far less risk of exposure than New York. It will take nationwide antibody testing to get the overall picture.

Any test will have false negatives and false positives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Georgia, USA
37,102 posts, read 41,261,487 times
Reputation: 45136
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
That's assuming all 320 million people in the US get infected, as you get to 60-70% infected, the herd immunity will start to kick in and less and less people should get it.
The 1918 influenza had an attack rate of about 30% for the pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is more infectious, but I do not think we will achieve herd immunity with just natural infection, though the number of cases will diminish. New folks will always keep aging into the high risk category.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Middle of the valley
48,525 posts, read 34,843,322 times
Reputation: 73759
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flip123 View Post
My girlfriend likely had Covid. No test that I am aware of but many symptoms and her doctor did a CT scan of her lungs which showed that they were inflamed but no pneumonia. It has now been 30 days since she started having symptoms and she seems to be fully recovered.


At what point is it safe to say that she is not contagious? My googling suggests that it should be fine now, but there are some articles talking about six weeks after symptoms go away. I have had no physical contact with her since this started and I don't want to put myself at risk.
Never. I was sick early Dec. with pneumonia. Xrays did not show it to be like Covid, just pneumonia. Covid has a very distinctive xray. I do not know that all Covid shows that way, and until I do I do not assume I had it.
__________________
____________________________________________
My posts as a Mod will always be in red.
Be sure to review Terms of Service: TOS
And check this out: FAQ
Moderator: Relationships Forum / Hawaii Forum / Dogs / Pets / Current Events
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-23-2020, 01:10 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,960,195 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by suzy_q2010 View Post
The 1918 influenza had an attack rate of about 30% for the pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 is more infectious, but I do not think we will achieve herd immunity with just natural infection, though the number of cases will diminish. New folks will always keep aging into the high risk category.
The Spanish flu had a death rate of 0.5% so this looks to be significantly more deadly if we assume about 25 000 deaths in the state of New York from those 13.9% infected. That'a assuming that about 4500 more people die over the next 15 days for a total statewide death toll of about 25 000 and they got infected during or prior to the statewide antibody testing.

I think we can also assume that the people in NY are a bit more healthy than the rest of the country, so the death rate might be higher in the rest of the country than NY. On the other hand, NY is slightly older so maybe it evens out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Current Events

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top